Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the solution!
>From my understanding, it's picking
template
void sum(const T , const MPI_Comm _communicator, U )
instead of
template
void sum(const ArrayView , const MPI_Comm &
mpi_communicator, const ArrayView & sums)
And that's why it is complaining that ",
Feimi,
it's picking the wrong overload.
Utilities::MPI::sum(local_vector, mpi_communicator, local_vector);
works as well as
Utilities::MPI::sum(my_view, mpi_communicator, my_view);
Best,
Daniel
Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 12:57 Uhr schrieb Feimi Yu :
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for your reply!
That's not true. The input and output arrays may be the same as described
in the documentation. The template instatiation error does not check
whether they are the same, either.
In addition, two different arrays give the same error.
Feimi
On Tuesday, January
I uploaded a minimal code to reproduce the problem I encountered.
Thanks!
Feimi
On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 1:42:18 PM UTC-5, Feimi Yu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to use the the function Utilities::MPI::sum
>
Hi Jean-Paul,
Thanks for your reply!
Yes, I did try passing an ArrayView, with no luck. I was told
the same undefined reference thing.
Feimi
On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 1:53:35 AM UTC-5, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote:
>
> Dear Feimi,
>
> On first glance, it looks like the object you send in as
Hi, David,
okay, please, attaching these files also.
On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 at 4:18:44 PM UTC+2, David Wells wrote:
>
> Hi Ihar,
>
> It looks like nothing went wrong with PETsc. Would you please also
> send a copy of deal.II's detailed.log and, if available,
> CMakeCache.txt from the
Hi Ihar,
It looks like nothing went wrong with PETsc. Would you please also
send a copy of deal.II's detailed.log and, if available,
CMakeCache.txt from the build directory?
Thanks,
David
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:59 PM Ihar Suvorau wrote:
>
> Sure, attaching a file, please.
>
> On Monday,
On 1/27/20 9:01 AM, David Wells wrote:
> It sounds like you want to use Patterns::Map or Patterns::List.
They can also be nested, which I think is essentially what you want. Though if
all of the entries of the list have the form
{set var = bool, set var2 = string, etc}
then you might as well
Krishanu,
> I understood that the the Dirichlet boundary condition in this problem was
> being applied on only the top surface. But what I am trying to implement
> seems
> a little different to me. I will try to explain in a little more detail with
> an example in the following part.
>
> I
