Re: [deal.II] visualization tool alternatives?

Hi Greg, I am a Paraview user. As far as I know.. almost everything you can do in Paraview can be done in Visit and the reciprocal viceversa statement is also true. There may be some features or processes for which one software is better than the other. But I am unaware. Sometimes, the

Re: [deal.II] visualization tool alternatives?

On 4/5/20 7:43 PM, rpresley716 wrote: I was wondering if there is alternative visualization tool other than VisIt introduced and recommended in the tutorials? I didn't successfully build

Re: [deal.II] visualization tool alternatives?

Hi Greg, Have you heard of Paraview? it's good. Felipe On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 09:43, rpresley716 wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering if there is alternative visualization tool other than VisIt > introduced and recommended in the tutorials? I didn't successfully build the > visit despite of

[deal.II] visualization tool alternatives?

Hi, I was wondering if there is alternative visualization tool other than VisIt introduced and recommended in the tutorials? I didn't successfully build the visit despite of opting for the minimal build. I also tried the VTK option of GLVis

[deal.II] Debug to identify pairs of DoFs that are co-lated and correspond to the components.

Hello all, I designed a coupled Laplace problem to play with ConstraintMatrix for coupled components. On face \Gamma_4 and \Gamma_2, I let u=0.5v-0.5, v=2u+1, respectively . [image: Screen Shot 2020-04-05 at 4.14.41 PM.png] Both u and v use the same finite element:

Re: [deal.II] Difficulty setting manifold with Opencascade using gmsh mesh + salome STEP (or IGES) - Step-54

Dear Jean-Paul, what you wrote in the FAQ is very clear. If I find additional elements as I play with the functionnality I will add it to the FAQ. Thanks for adding this section. Best Bruno On Friday, 3 April 2020 16:11:05 UTC-4, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > > Dear Bruno, > > I guess that it

[deal.II] Re: ABOUT ASSEMBLING RIGHT HAND SIDE

For correction, the right code for the second method is for (; cell != endc; ++cell) { local_rhs = 0; fe_values.reinit(cell); fe_values.get_function_values(old_solution, old_sol_values); for (unsigned int q = 0; q < n_q_points; ++q ){ for (unsigned int i = 0; i

[deal.II] ABOUT ASSEMBLING RIGHT HAND SIDE

Hi, I am implementing the backward Euler method to solve a time-dependent problem like u(n+1)= h*f(n+1)+u(n). n is the nth time step. h is the time step length. f is a function of time. I tried two ways to assemble the system right-hand side(rhs). One is to form a mass matrix first, then time