[deal.II] deal.II Newsletter #121

2020-06-05 Thread Rene Gassmoeller
Hello everyone! This is deal.II newsletter #121. It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the deal.II finite element library. ## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features: #10470: Fix more issues found by AddressSanitizer (proposed by

Re: [deal.II] step 70 9.2 version

2020-06-05 Thread heena patel
Thanks Luca it works. Regards, Heena On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 6:19 PM luca.heltai wrote: > Dear Heena, > > unfortunately, we failed in cherry picking a default value in the > parameter file. > > The generated parameter handler tries to write output files in a `results` > directory (as indicated

Re: [deal.II] step 70 9.2 version

2020-06-05 Thread luca.heltai
Yes. On it. L. > On 5 Jun 2020, at 18:21, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > On 6/5/20 10:19 AM, luca.heltai wrote: >> Wolfgang, it seems that indeed the default parameter file in 9.2 still >> contains `set Output directory = results`.:( > > Want to move that to the 9.2.x branch in case we create

[deal.II] Re: How to get normal / tangential vectors at nodes, not at quadrature points?

2020-06-05 Thread Lex Lee
Brilliant! Thanks a lot. -Lei Li On Friday, June 5, 2020 at 4:49:56 AM UTC-7, Simon Sticko wrote: > > Hi, > I suspect that the condition you have would be easier to enforce weakly by > adding terms to the weak formulation, as is done in e.g. discontinuous > Galerkin. > > Nevertheless, if you

Re: [deal.II] step 70 9.2 version

2020-06-05 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 6/5/20 10:19 AM, luca.heltai wrote: Wolfgang, it seems that indeed the default parameter file in 9.2 still contains `set Output directory = results`.:( Want to move that to the 9.2.x branch in case we create a .1 release? Best W. --

Re: [deal.II] step 70 9.2 version

2020-06-05 Thread luca.heltai
Dear Heena, unfortunately, we failed in cherry picking a default value in the parameter file. The generated parameter handler tries to write output files in a `results` directory (as indicated in the default parameter file `set Output directory = results`), which however is not created by

[deal.II] Re: How to get normal / tangential vectors at nodes, not at quadrature points?

2020-06-05 Thread Simon Sticko
Hi, I suspect that the condition you have would be easier to enforce weakly by adding terms to the weak formulation, as is done in e.g. discontinuous Galerkin. Nevertheless, if you still want the normals at the nodes you can create a "dummy" quadrature which has the nodes on the face as

[deal.II] Re: hp fem error assigning Fourier

2020-06-05 Thread A.Z Ihsan
Hi Peter, thank you for the answer. Actually i did put the fe_series.h. I forgot to mention that the problem arise when i use template specialization by the end the implementation #include #include #include #include using namespace dealii; namespace hpfe{ template class HPSolver {

[deal.II] Re: hp fem error assigning Fourier

2020-06-05 Thread 'peterrum' via deal.II User Group
Dear Ihsan, I have no problem to compile the following code (your code with minor adjustments): #include #include #include #include using namespace dealii; template class HPSolver { public: HPSolver( const unsigned int max_fe_degree); //virtual ~HPSolver(); const

[deal.II] hp fem error assigning Fourier

2020-06-05 Thread A.Z Ihsan
Hi All, I am trying to implement hp-fem into my problem according to the step-27. But, i have an error when i am trying to compile, error: no matching function for call to 'dealii::FESeries::Fourier<3, > 3>::Fourier(std::vector&, dealii::hp::FECollection<3, 3>&, >