Re: [deal.II] Setting manifold for a truncated cone mesh

Daniel, Thanks a lot. This will be of great help to me. On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 7:26:05 PM UTC+5:30 d.arnd...@gmail.com wrote: > Vachan, > > the source code to GridGenerator::truncated_cone() related to manifold_is, > boundary_ids and manifolds looks like > > // Set boundary ids at

Re: [deal.II] Setting manifold for a truncated cone mesh

Vachan, the source code to GridGenerator::truncated_cone() related to manifold_is, boundary_ids and manifolds looks like // Set boundary ids at -half_length to 1 and at half_length to 2. Set the // manifold id on hull faces (i.e., faces not on either end) to 0. for (const auto :

Re: [deal.II] Setting manifold for a truncated cone mesh

Daniel, Thank you for the response. Just to confirm, will the inner cell edges also have proper curvature? Pease pardon the triviality. I am just too doubtful about the working of manifolds. On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 6:24:48 PM UTC+5:30 d.arnd...@gmail.com wrote: > Vachan, > > that should

Re: [deal.II] Setting manifold for a truncated cone mesh

Vachan, that should work. There is nothing special about using GridGenerator to create geometries that can not be achieved by reading in a custom mesh and setting the boundary ids, manifold ids and manifold. Best, Daniel Am Di., 6. Apr. 2021 um 07:42 Uhr schrieb vachanpo...@gmail.com <

[deal.II] Re: CUDA without nVidia

Michal, > > Support for AMD through HIP is very high on my todo list but the compiler > is not that great right now, i.e. the compiler can (and will) generate > buggy code. > Ok, so even if Deal.II will be ported I can assume so for other libraries. Good to know that HIP does require

[deal.II] Setting manifold for a truncated cone mesh

Dear all, I have a rather silly question; I am not confident about my understanding of manifolds. Suppose I want to replicate what GridGenerator::truncated_cone() does, but I have a

Re: [deal.II] 2d meshes and orientation

Dear Wolfgang, On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 5:53:15 AM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > It's possible this is indeed a bug. In most cases, we run the 2d meshes > through the mesh orienter, so we rarely see 2d meshes that are not > correctly > oriented and it wouldn't surprise me if we have