Re: [deal.II] Extractors for local_rhs in step-22

2021-11-19 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 11/19/21 6:26 PM, Marco Feder wrote: indeed, as we have incompressibility, the last component of the rhs will always be 0. I wrote a possible patch, I'll open the pr tomorrow so that I can take another look at it! Awesome, thanks! W. --

Re: [deal.II] Extractors for local_rhs in step-22

2021-11-19 Thread Marco Feder
Thanks Wolfgang, indeed, as we have incompressibility, the last component of the rhs will always be 0. I wrote a possible patch, I'll open the pr tomorrow so that I can take another look at it! Best, Marco Il giorno venerdì 19 novembre 2021 alle 23:15:50 UTC+1 Wolfgang Bangerth ha scritto:

Re: [deal.II] neumann boundary condition for a vector valued continuous FE equation using matrix free

2021-11-19 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 11/19/21 12:57 AM, Ray Mclaren wrote: I am solving a vector valued equation (mechanical equilibrium) using dealii's matrix free infrastructure. Although the library has several examples on how to apply neumann BC using matrix free most are either scalar equations and using DG methods.

Re: [deal.II] Extractors for local_rhs in step-22

2021-11-19 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
Marco, I was going through step-22 and I saw that since you're using primitive elements, then you compute the local_rhs contribution using /fe.system_to_component_index(i).first/ However, as written in the program, we could as well multiply the dim+1 tensor having the values of the i-th

[deal.II] deal.II Newsletter #191

2021-11-19 Thread 'Rene Gassmoeller' via deal.II User Group
Hello everyone! This is deal.II newsletter #191. It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the deal.II finite element library. ## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features: #12970: Replace cancel-builds-on-update by concurrency feature in the