[deal.II] Re: MPI and Docker

2022-04-05 Thread jack urombo
I am running dealii in Docker container and because of issue to do with using filesystem under c++17 i have: *[ 0%] Building CXX object source/CMakeFiles/rotatingMHD.dir/problem_class.cc.o * */home/dealii/rotmhd/source/problem_class.cc: In constructor ‘RMHD::Problem::Problem(const

Re: [deal.II] step-35 in modified

2022-04-05 Thread jack urombo
I want to generate convergence table for the modified step-35 for a couple of velocity and pressure error norms. The problem seems to emanate from my definition of the errors in *process_output() *template. The message is: *[ 50%] Building CXX object

[deal.II] deal.II Newsletter #206

2022-04-05 Thread 'Rene Gassmoeller' via deal.II User Group
Hello everyone! This is deal.II newsletter #206. It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the deal.II finite element library. ## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features: #13593: Installation problem with MPI on Windows (proposed by

Re: [deal.II] Error installing dealii by candi on Apple M1

2022-04-05 Thread Timo Heister
Can you post the output of "grep HDF5 detailed.log" in the directory /Users/fr714/dealii-candi-basic/tmp/unpack/deal.II-v9.3.3/ please? On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 9:18:01 AM UTC-4 freddri...@gmail.com wrote: > I also have the same issue, irrespective of whether I try to compile using > the

Re: [deal.II] how to extend step-42 to quasi-static problem

2022-04-05 Thread gif...@gmail.com
Dear Wolfgang thank you for your quick reply. All your suggestions are very useful. I have already done some debugging you proposed, but I will go back on my steps, and try again to do it more carefully. Best Giovanni On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 4:49:30 PM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: >

Re: [deal.II] how to extend step-42 to quasi-static problem

2022-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 4/5/22 07:21, gif...@gmail.com wrote: I tried with different mesh refinements and different time-step sizes, but the analyses provide unsatisfactory results. By summarizing, the size of active set reduces to zero after the first time step, and then increases. The convergence of the Newton

Re: [deal.II] Issue using component_wise()

2022-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 4/5/22 04:47, Hermes Sampedro wrote: Now I am trying to order the dof according to the components. However, I am experiencing that when using /DoFRenumbering::component_wise/ and running with more than 1 MPI rank, my solution vector has inf values. Which, does not happen when using only 1

[deal.II] how to extend step-42 to quasi-static problem

2022-04-05 Thread gif...@gmail.com
Dear all, I'm trying to extend step-42, according to what the authors Frohne, Heister, and Bangerth suggested in the related paper, ie: modify the current one-step analysis to a sequence of loading steps (quasi-static analysis). Apart from a for-loop over the pseudo-time parameter, i) I

[deal.II] Issue using component_wise()

2022-04-05 Thread Hermes Sampedro
Dear all, I am facing an issue and would like to ask for some help. I am using a distributed approach using PETS, similar to step-40 and I use a 2 component system (similar to step-29). Now I am trying to order the dof according to the components. However, I am experiencing that when using