Re: [deal.II] Sparsity pattern error while applying periodic boundary conditions

On 2/13/24 10:53, Vinayak Vijay wrote: The error says "You are trying to access the matrix entry with index <54,0>". *This seems to be inconsistent with the constraint matrix* (printed in the output above)*. *I am also attaching the sparsity pattern if needed. Can someone help me with this?

Re: [deal.II] TBB issue on an arm-based Mac

I am encountering a similar runtime error with one of my applications: Assertion 1L > > > > > I've been stuck on this TBB issue for a while. Would you be able to give > me > > some hints on solving this problem? I would really appreciate it.

[deal.II] deal.II Newsletter #274

Hello everyone! This is deal.II newsletter #274. It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the deal.II finite element library. ## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features: #16641: Added complex sparse matrix instantiations. (proposed by

[deal.II] Sparsity pattern error while applying periodic boundary conditions

Deal deal.II community, I want to apply periodic boundary conditions to my problem. But I can't use the make_periodicity_constraint() function due to the special nature of my problem (or so I think). So i create the required constraint matrix by taking the usual route of the

[deal.II] Sparsity pattern error while applying periodic boundary conditions

Deal deal.II community, I want to apply periodic boundary conditions to my problem. But I can't use the make_periodicity_constraint() function due to the special nature of my problem (or so I think). So i create the required constraint matrix by taking the usual route of the