[deal.II] Re: configuration with LAPACK/BLAS fails

the right blas library. I ended up installing gmsh on my ubuntu machine and had deal.ii use the manually installed gmsh library, instead. Now all deal.ii tests pass Thanks everyone for their suggestions and help On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 1:46:21 PM UTC-4, Ahmad Shahba wrote: > > Thank

Re: [deal.II] configuration with LAPACK/BLAS fails

it is absolutely the only way to get around this issue On Tuesday, July 2, 2019 at 8:24:06 PM UTC-4, Lee wrote: > > Spack offers a powerful alternative way to install DEAL.II. > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:18 AM Ahmad Shahba > wrote: > >> I am trying to compile deal.ii (ver

[deal.II] Imposing Dirichlet-type conditions via AffineConstraints: Expected behavior or bug?

Hi all, I am seeing a rather strange behavior from AffineConstraints when dealing with inhomogenous Dirichlet-type conditions in an MPI context. To explain this behavior, I set up a small problem which involves solving a system of linear equations. The coefficient matrix is an 8x8 identity

Re: [deal.II] Reading a Tensor from parameter file

} } } On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 3:54:57 AM UTC-4, Paras Kumar wrote: > > Ahmad, > > On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at 5:39:06 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Shahba wrote: >> >> I don't know if it is the optimal way but I would use the following >&

Re: [deal.II] Reading a Tensor from parameter file

] = " << tensor[ii][jj] << std::endl; } } } Enter code here... On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 8:53:55 AM UTC-4, Ahmad Shahba wrote: > > Here is the code that does what I explained. I just switched up step 5 > with a much simpler ap

Re: [deal.II] Imposing Dirichlet-type conditions via AffineConstraints: Expected behavior or bug?

Thanks Wolfgang for your help! I tried it out and it worked. Regards, Ahmad On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 7:59 PM Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 3/17/20 8:34 AM, Ahmad Shahba wrote: > > > > *_My question:_* > > Is this behavior expected? Or am I doing something wrong or perhaps

Re: [deal.II] Reading a Tensor from parameter file

I don't know if it is the optimal way but I would use the following approach 1. Read tensor components as Patterns::List 2. Use get method of ParameterHandler to read all

[deal.II] Imposing Dirichlet-type conditions via AffineConstraints: Expected behavior or bug?

Hi all, I am re-posting this here and delete the previous one since the images in my original post do not load properly. So here it is! I am seeing a rather strange behavior from AffineConstraints when dealing with inhomogenous Dirichlet-type conditions in an MPI context. To explain this

Re: [deal.II] Deal.II programming environment

I just wanted to add that I use CLion for C++ programming. I have been developing codes (and linking to deal.ii among other libraries) in CLion for 3 years now. Given that the entry point in CLion is a CMakeList file, it was quite easy for me to load deal.ii examples and compile/run/debug/profile

Re: [deal.II] Solving Problems Involving Multiple Triangulations

Thanks, Wolfgang! It does make sense Regards, Ahmad On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:27 PM Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 9/30/21 9:21 AM, ah.s...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I would like to solve an elastic problem in a thick slab supported by a > truss > > structure, as shown in the attached image.

Re: [deal.II] Explicit Instantiation of DoFTools::distribute_cell_to_dof_vector function

Thanks, Wolfgang! Will do Ahmad On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:27 PM Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 6/25/22 02:55, ah.s...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I noticed that DoFTools::distribute_cell_to_dof_vector function is not > > explicitly instantiated for non-zero codim (dim != spacedim) problems. > > >

Re: [deal.II] Re: error while installing dealii using candi

By using the -j1 argument, you are requesting candi to use 1 process for compilation. If you are interested to engage, say 2 processes, you should pass -j2 to the candi shell script. Something like ./candi.sh -j2 If you visit the github homepage of candi, you’ll see a whole bunch of options for