Dear Daniel,
I will try to come up with a minimal example. In the meantime, below is the
piece of code and I will try to explain using this. I tried running in
Debug mode as well but not able to figure out the error. For the code
below in combination with the rest of the code, the last line of
I tried finding
functionalities such as active_quad_index() similar to active_fe_index().
But, I found that they are coupled when inserted using push_back().
Currently, I am not able to see a way out of it. If someone knows how to do
this or has some trick in mind, please let me know.
Best
--
*Deepak Gupta*
Dear All,
I am currently dealing with hanging support points in my problem and I have
a couple of questions. These are:
1. For my case, different elements of the mesh have different polynomial
orders of the basis. Due to support points at the element edges, I believe
there will be hanging
Dear All,
Thanks for your replies. Indeed I had thought of the same as suggested by
Jean and am implementing it. Thanks for helping out.
Best regards
Deepak
On Friday, July 15, 2016 at 2:02:43 PM UTC+2, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am currently dealing with hanging su
Dear All,
I am aware of the fact that ConstraintMatrix.n_constraints() gives the
number of hanging nodes for h-refinement, but if I only use p-refinement,
can it give the number of hanging support points occurring due to the
difference in the order of bases between two adjacent elements? I am
Dear All,
I am using the KellyEstimator as an 'indicator' for simple hp-adaptive
problems. I read the documentation that for hp cases, CF = hF/2PF is
considered. I would like to know if this has been published somewhere
which I can refer. In addition, I am looking for a reference where it is
to extend the simple example for a basic version of
the elastic problem I am trying to solve. Hope then I can figure out the
error.
Best regards
Deepak
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth <bange...@colostate.edu>
wrote:
> On 10/05/2016 09:03 AM, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>
&g
it later.
> J-P
>
>
> On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 12:19:39 PM UTC+2, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Thanks JP for the elaborate clarification. I quickly tried to test a
>> *distributed
>> source term* commenting out the point load function and adding the
>>
> VectorTools::interpolate_boundary_values (dof_handler,
>> 0,
>> ZeroFunction(),
>> constraints);
>
>
> On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 2:02:18 PM UTC+2,
s of using it in this context are (i.e. the interaction of
> hp-constraints).
>
> Regards,
> J-P
>
> On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 8:41:42 AM UTC+2, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Dear JP,
>>
>> Thanks for looking at the example. The code itself is not a simple
&
system RHS vector.
>
> I hope that this explains better what I think you might need to do to
> correct the issue.
>
> J-P
>
> On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 11:26:18 AM UTC+2, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Thanks JP. Indeed a concise example should help and that is where
is
correct). However, now I have to figure out why set_boundary_indicator
affects the number of constraints.
Anyways have a nice weekend.
Best
Deepak
On 27-08-16 03:57, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
On 08/26/2016 03:49 PM, Deepak GUpta wrote:
Indeed Wolfgang is right.
Can't help but respond
Dear All,
I am trying to use KellyErrorEstimator of deal.II and I saw various
tutorials which use it. I ran those examples and they work well.
Recently, I tried it with my work and when I print the
estimated_error_per_cell vector, all of the values in that vector are
zero. I have been trying
. Have you tried increasing the number of face
quadrature points (I notice that qrule starts at 1, but without
knowing which type and degree FE you are using, its hard to judge if
the way you choose the quadrature order is correct).
Regards,
J-P
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 1:23:03 PM UTC+2,
Indeed Wolfgang is right. With the stated change, the example code of JP
works now. So I need to relate the error in mine.
Thanks Wolfgang and Jean-Paul for the help.
Best
Deepak
On 26-08-16 23:08, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
On 08/25/2016 02:34 AM, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote:
Hi Deepak,
Ok,
Dear All,
Below is a simple piece of code where one finite element has a different
p-order compared to the rest. Thus, I expect certain
hanging_node_constraints (which is 4) in the output. What I cannot figure
out is why I get *zero *constraints when I check the hanging constraints a
second time?
e, but I would like to know why it was a
problem (what goes on in the background as per the implementation?)
Best
Deepak
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth <bange...@colostate.edu>
wrote:
> On 09/27/2016 08:52 AM, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>
>>
>> I created a simple
Dear Julian,
This question has been asked in the past and there are already some threads
which might be of help to you:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/dealii/dof$20coordinates%7Csort:relevance
Best,
Deepak
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Julian Dorn
wrote:
Dear Sudharshan,
Probably you are looking for cell->index(). Am I right?
best
Deepak
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Sudarshan Kumar wrote:
>
> typename DoFHandler::active_cell_
> iterator
> cell = dof_handler.begin_active(),
> endc = dof_handler.end();
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo