:
>
> On 01/25/2018 12:32 PM, Eldar Khattatov wrote:
> > Sorry that was indeed a wrong file. I attached the right one.
>
> I *think* the problem comes from the this error:
>
> /usr/bin/c++ [...]
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib/libmpi_cxx.so: er
Sorry that was indeed a wrong file. I attached the right one.
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 11:25:21 AM UTC-5, Eldar Khattatov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the reply.
> I attached the cmake log file.
>
> On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 11:35:53 PM UTC-5, Matthias
I forgot to mention, I tried both the development and 8.5.1versions of
deal.II and the errors are the same.
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you
I was asked to help a fellow graduate student with installing deal.ii on
his laptop that runs Ubuntu 17.10, and for some reason, I end up having the
following error message from cmake:
CMake Error at cmake/setup_finalize.cmake:95 (MESSAGE):
>
>
>
> Configuration error: Cannot compile a
08/18/2017 06:19 AM, Eldar Khattatov wrote:
> > It tries to compare FE_RaviartThomas. This element indeed does not
> implement
> > compare_for_face_domination() function,
>
> Correct. Though you could think about implementing it.
>
>
> > so I tried u
One way of using Lagrange multipliers on the boundary is to have an
additional full dimensional space for them. With this you will be able to
compute the boundary terms, but you will need to restrict the interior DOFs
of this space by adding something like:
(epsilon * lambda, mu)_Omega,
It tries to compare FE_RaviartThomas. This element indeed does not
implement compare_for_face_domination() function, so I tried using
FE_RaviartThomasNodal instead, as it provides an implementation for this
function. Unfortunately, from what I understood from the implementation in
RT_Nodal, it
Hi,
I am trying to implement a coupled Stokes-Darcy problem using Step-46
tutorial as an example. So, essentially I would want to use something like
the following
FESystem fe_stokes(FE_Q(2), dim, // Stokes pair
FE_Q(1), 1,
FE_Nothing(dim),
as well as on faces.
> From my recent experience that is at least half of the work ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Denis.
>
>
> On Friday, January 6, 2017 at 8:24:20 PM UTC+1, Eldar Khattatov wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was working on implementing new finite element spac
Hello,
I was working on implementing new finite element space, which can roughly
be described as RT + curl bubbles. I wrote the new FE class and the class
for the underlying polynomials space. I wanted to incorporate these to my
local installation of Deal.II in order to test it, so my question
I managed to imply the Neumann conditions on stress only by first
projecting the boundary values to the entire mixed space (affecting
rotations), and then manually removing the constraints associated with
rotations. The code is below if someone is interested.
I am trying to implement mixed elasticity with Neumann conditions using
deal.ii. The formulation seeks for stress, displacement and rotation as the
unknowns, and the Neumann conditions are to set stress normal components to
be equal to some function g.
I know that for mixed Darcy it is
12 matches
Mail list logo
