Dear fellow community members,
Hi! I want to
simulate some simulation cases based upon the elastoplastic material model.
They involve the loading and then unloading of the material too. I tried
with the step-42 but apparently it is
Thanks a lot Prof. Wolfgang. Your guidance was very fruitful and right on
point. Solved my problem! :)
On Thursday, August 6, 2020 at 1:53:48 AM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> > Thanks for the guidance. I tried
> > replacing the "
es attached. Looking forward
for your guiding response!
Thank you very much for ongoing cooperation.
On Friday, July 31, 2020 at 5:31:13 PM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 7/30/20 5:26 PM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > _But it gives the fol
and productive support.
On Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 2:11:10 AM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 7/28/20 11:05 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > /.~/working_dir/step-42$ /step-42 p1_chinese.prm
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)/
<./step-42 input.prm>[Inferior 1 (process 5082) exited with code 01]*
Can there be a possible problem in using the " *particle_handler(triangulation,
mapping, /*n_properties=*/dim) *" ? Thank you!
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 1:35:53 AM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 7/16/20 9:15
experience in this regard
or know about relevant deal.ii tutorial dealing with same feature. Thank
On Thursday, July 16, 2020 at 4:59:31 AM UTC+2 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 7/15/20 11:05 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > My question is that along with this, can
Dear Deal.ii users,
Hi! I am working on the deal.ii code. I
have data of stress and strain tensors at quadrature points. Currently
using the results_output function, I am transferring the data at nodal
points of my triangulation using "
he extensive literature
> e.g. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470694626 Here
> they explain the algorithm in detail.
> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:09, Muhammad Mashhood > wrote:
> On Monday, February 24, 2020 at 12:42:17 A
On Monday, February 24, 2020 at 12:42:17 AM UTC+1, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> > In my question I meant whether is it possible to evaluated plastic
> > component from currently implemented plasticity algorithm as a further
> > development of this code?
> I am pretty sure that
Looking forward to your guiding response. Thank you once again for your
concern and consistent guidance!
On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 3:05:33 PM UTC+1, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 2/21/20 4:25 AM, Muhammad Mashhood
Dear Prof. Wolfgang,
Thank you for sharing the tutorial step.
I am using the plasticity (material non linearity) part of it with the
surface force (Neuman BC) as a mechanical load. When I remove the load the
plasticized domain comes back to its original
Great idea Prof. Bangerth. Thanks!
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 7:02:48 PM UTC+1, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 11/21/19 10:41 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > Hi! I am trying to setup quasi static
> > thermoelastoplastic code using th
deal.ii code for small
strain elastoplasticity (additive decomposed approach) to be coupled with
It would be nice addition in my code to fasten up my project. Thank you in
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org
Thank you for the concern and response. I got your
point there. I will try it in this way then. :)
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 6:38:53 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 8/5/19 3:40 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > The only thi
ture as I mentioned above) ? Thank you!
On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 11:54:58 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 8/2/19 4:01 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > considering the above scenario as well as the concerns, I would be
> grateful to
> > receive any
Thank you for the suggestion and I also think it can be one
of the way to successfully run both solutions by sharing information on
correct corresponding q_points.
I tried the same approach (as I am also using partitioned approach for
thermomechanical coupling) but so
, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> Dear Prof Wolfgang,
> Hi! I am successful in running the code and
> it is without a doubt a nice addition to deal.ii code gallery. It
> reproduces the expected result for 3d Beam case now.
> Since I did not find an
Dear Prof Wolfgang,
Hi! I am successful in running the code and
it is without a doubt a nice addition to deal.ii code gallery. It
reproduces the expected result for 3d Beam case now.
Since I did not find any thermomechanical coupled example so far in deal.ii
Thank you Prof Wolfgang for your possible support and concern. I will be
waiting for the further support from the author to successfully run it and
to understand the workflow correctly.
On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 1:51:10 AM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> let me bring the
ode gallery. May be I am missing some
instructions to run it so any help or hint in this regard would be much
appreciated. Thank you very much in advance!
On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 6:36:23 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 6/17/19 1:50 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
Dear deal.ii users,
I recently started working with deal.ii and
want to work with material models from material mechanics. For this so far
I came across nicely written and well worked code of "The 'Goal-oriented
mesh adaptivity in elastoplasticity problems " in the
Hi Andrew! I am also working on the same problem and would be interested to
have a look into Thesis but the link says it has been removed.
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014 at 12:27:09 PM UTC+2, mac wrote:
> The link below is to an MSc thesis that details all the steps to solve the
> is involved.
> On Mon, May 27, 2019, 21:59 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>> On 5/27/19 11:01 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
>> > I am working with deal.ii step-26 to implement
>> > dependent thermal diff
at 10:58:59 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 5/27/19 11:01 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > I am working with deal.ii step-26 to implement
> > dependent thermal diffusivity. Currently for thermal diffusivity values
> > o
I am working with deal.ii step-26 to implement temperature
dependent thermal diffusivity. Currently for thermal diffusivity values >
order of 1e-2 the results are quit satisfactory but if I use the low
thermal diffusivity values like the order of 1e-6 to 1e-3, I get
Hi Joerg and Lisa!
Thank you for informative reply and posting this concern on the forum. I am
also interested in thermoelastic problem and new use of deal.ii.
My question is that other than the tutorial steps 26 & 18 or 20,21 & 22, is
there pre-developed application at
4/26/19 3:42 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > Thank you Prof. Bangerth for the correction that was quit helping.
> > the code started running but unfortunately the function is returning
> with the
> > zero "tmp" vector. Any possible correction?
It seems that "tmp" vector stays unchanged i.e. function is seemingly not
assigning any face rhs values to "tmp" vector.
On Friday, April 26, 2019 at 11:42:09 AM UTC+2, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> Thank you Prof. Bangerth for the correction that was quit helping.
ere I want to impose
"*ConstantFunction(1)*" value 1 supposing that the "
*create_boundary_right_hand_side*" will apply it itself on both ends when
ids not specified explicitly.
On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 8:49:04 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 4/25
recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/run.dir/rule' failedmake: Leaving
for target 'run' failedmake: *** [CMakeFiles/run.dir/rule] Error 2make:
*** [run] Error 2"/usr/
ped way in deal.ii ? Thank you
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 4:16:02 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 4/10/19 4:52 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > _But the step-26 which I am now concerned about is directly forming rhs
> > somehow using the fu
So how can I possibly implement heat flux on cell faces in this example
case step-26 ? If I can, then I guess my problem is solved to learn
implementing Neuman BC for Heat equation in deal.ii. Thank you very much in
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 5:56:46 AM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bang
ril 9, 2019 at 5:23:04 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 4/9/19 3:44 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > Thank you very much Prof. Bangerth. The Neuman condition is now
> > successfully on the face elements in relatively simpler way (which you
> > pr
advance for your suggestion!
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 at 3:10:35 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> On 4/4/19 4:05 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> > for (unsigned int f=0; f :: faces_per_cell; ++f)
> > if (ce
ght that I am using "FEFaceValues" in following
code as per tutorials:
for (unsigned int f=0; f :: faces_per_cell; ++f)
if (cell->face(f)->at_boundary() )
for (unsigned int i=0; i
Dear group members,
I am trying to apply the Neumann (force)
BC on the edge using the right_hand_side() function which I modified as
void right_hand_side (const std::vector > , // the
active cell is also imported when right hand side is called
> conditions directly from the mesh itself but, since deal.II is a finite
> element library and not a multi physics library, it would have no
> understanding of what these types of boundary conditions mean.
> Does that help you?
I am new to deal.ii and looking for a nice interfacing tool for
making mesh import, BC application, solution and post-processing for
simulation cases etc. easy for me. Can anyone give me suggestion regarding
this? Thank you!
The deal.II project is located at
Mail list logo