Hello all,
I would like to know if I can use one name space (step-x) in another name
space (step-y). So that I can couple the 2 or more steps.
Thank you.
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 11:30:21 AM UTC+2, Ramprasad R wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thank you so much for your detailed
ad,
>
> Le mer. 17 juil. 2019 à 11:24, Ramprasad R
> a écrit :
> > Yes I did recompile it. The details of the config files are in the
> attachment.
> There is something strange in you installation: detailed.log says that
> you are using PETSc but config.h says that you are
Hello,
Yes I did recompile it. The details of the config files are in the
attachment.
Regards,
Ramprasad Raghunath
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:14 PM Daniel Arndt wrote:
> Ramprasad,
>
> Did you also recompile, i.e. run 'make', afterwards? Can you also show us
> the file 'detailed.log' in your
sin
wrote:
> Ramprasad,
>
> On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 at 11:51:00 AM UTC-4, Ramprasad R wrote:
>>
>> The version of deal.ii is 9.0.1 and the version of PETSc is 3.10.5. I
>> also changed the config file of deal.ii to have MPI PETSc on.
>>
> What do you mean by &quo
Dear Daniel,
The version of deal.ii is 9.0.1 and the version of PETSc is 3.10.5. I also
changed the config file of deal.ii to have MPI PETSc on.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Ramprasad
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:12 PM Daniel Arndt wrote:
> Ramprasad,
>
> Let's first rule out some simple problems.
Hello All,
I am getting an error when I try to compile the step-18. It states
"PETScWrappers does not name a type". I wanted to know if anyone else has
faced the same problem. And if there is a solution to this.
Thank you.
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For
<
danielgarsanc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, June 24, 2019 at 11:36:32 PM UTC+2, Ramprasad R wrote:
>>
>> Hello Bangerth,
>>
>> The terms N_* are the resultant forces in the * direction and these
>> forces are calculated using the strains which in turn ar
you.
Regards,
Ramprasad
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:56 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 6/24/19 9:24 AM, Ramprasad R wrote:
> >
> > The following image has the exact formulation of the geometric stiffness
> > matrix. Which is denoted by G in the image.
>
> Rampras
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am a student in Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany. I am
trying to work on a project for the aerospace department of my university.
In this project I am trying to extend the step 60 tutorial into buckling
analysis. I am trying to find a function to calculate the
