Sure, I will add my progress following this email.
Best regards,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 7:47 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 8/16/20 6:38 PM, yuesu jin wrote:
> > Thank you very much! I found step-62 yesterday and I have
> compared the
> > difference between them. I want to write two vers
On 8/16/20 6:38 PM, yuesu jin wrote:
Thank you very much! I found step-62 yesterday and I have compared the
difference between them. I want to write two versions and compare their CPU
time to get an exact result.
That would be interesting to hear about -- please let us know what you find!
Dear Dr. Bangerth,
Thank you very much! I found step-62 yesterday and I have compared the
difference between them. I want to write two versions and compare their
CPU time to get an exact result.
Best regards,
Yuesu
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 7:19 PM Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> Yuesu,
>
> >I
Yuesu,
I am adding an absorbing boundary condition like step-24 did in the
frequency domain, in which the time derivative gives a complex term. I also
found the complex acoustic wave problem step-29 which splits the complex wave
function into two real parts.
What I want to know is what
Dear all,
I am adding an absorbing boundary condition like step-24 did in the
frequency domain, in which the time derivative gives a complex term. I
also found the complex acoustic wave problem step-29 which splits the
complex wave function into two real parts.
What I want to know is what if I
