Dear Wolfgang and Jean-Paul,
I appreciate very much your assistance.
The explanation in Wolfgang's last reply clarified to me some things that I
didn't fully understand previously. I believe that now I know how to
implement the interface matching conditions in my code. It seems to me that
I
Dear Oded,
I believe that Wolfgang has answered your question in much more detail and
much more precision than I would have, so I think that there's no need for
me to elaborate on further on what I said.
Regards,
J-P
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 5:47:17 PM UTC+1, Oded Yaakobi wrote:
>
> Hi
On 12/05/2016 09:47 AM, Oded Yaakobi wrote:
I am working on generalizing a model that originally described only the
interior domain by the equations that I wrote on my Friday’s notes. I am not
familiar with anyone who solved the combined set of equations for the interior
and exterior domains.
Hi Wolfgang and Jean-Paul,
It seems that one of Wolfgang’s replies to me was not shared through the
user group, so I forward it here. My response is listed below it.
*On 12/2/16, 6:18 PM, "Wolfgang Bangerth" wrote:*
Oded,
*I know that the typical treatment of the
Hi Oded,
Is this the recommended way to address point a), or is there another way
> which is better?
>
I don't work primarily in fluid-mechanics, so this is a bit out of my field
of knowledge (and comfort zone) and I'm going to defer to other's wisdom
here. I suppose you're uncomfortable that
Hi Wolfgang,
I know that the typical treatment of the interface matching conditions is
along the lines that you noted. However, it is not clear to me how to
follow these guidelines in the particular case that I am working on, which
is described in the file that I attached to my previous
On 12/02/2016 01:13 PM, Oded Yaakobi wrote:
Now I encounter another aspect of my problem that I don’t know how to tackle –
the matching conditions on the interface between the domains of the Stokes
flow in the droplet and around it.
Attached is a description of the problem in detail. I would
Hi Oded,
As you've observed, this class is not yet compatible with the
hp::DoFHandler. If you'd like to try to extend it to support this case then
we'd be happy accept a patch and to help you in doing so.
Regards,
J-P
On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 11:54:27 PM UTC+2, Oded Yaakobi wrote:
>
>
