Hi,
> and the code seems to be working fine! Is there anything that I am
> missing in your opinion?
No. If you're happy, I'm happy.
Best,
Simon
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 7:51:11 AM UTC+2, Samuel Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> I am a slow learner but you were correct. Here is the first
Hi,
>From the figure you can't really tell whether the boundary condition is
fulfilled or not. If you want to check if the normal derivative is
reasonable (almost equal to 0) at the boundary, the easiest is probably to
plot the solution on a line in the radial direction. This can be done by
Hi Simon,
It seems I might not have understood my own question. You answered the
question I was trying to ask. Would you be able to help me out with one
more thing? I followed your advice but the boundary conditions do not seem
bedo not seem to be getting the correct boundary conditions, so I
Hi,
I'm not sure I understand your question correctly, but if you want to
impose an inhomogeneous Neumann boundary condition you would typically
write a small class representing the boundary condition you want:
class NeumannBoundaryCondition : public Function<3>
{
public:
double
value(const
