Re: [deal.II] Re: Use of DoFRenumbering

2022-01-16 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 1/16/22 6:25 AM, Raghunandan Pratoori wrote: Thanks for your reply. I use DoFRenumbering with parallel::distributed::Triangulation and it works for me. I wanted to know why it was not used in step-40. Is it that the improvement observed vs the time taken for renumbering does not make it

[deal.II] Re: Use of DoFRenumbering

2022-01-16 Thread Raghunandan Pratoori
Hi Marc, Thanks for your reply. I use DoFRenumbering with parallel::distributed::Triangulation and it works for me. I wanted to know why it was not used in step-40. Is it that the improvement observed vs the time taken for renumbering does not make it worth using it in this specific case?

[deal.II] Re: Use of DoFRenumbering

2022-01-10 Thread Marc Fehling
Hi I've found application examples for parallel::distributed::Triangulation in our tests. See for example https://github.com/dealii/dealii/blob/master/tests/mpi/renumber_cuthill_mckee.cc As you specifically mentioned step-40, I think this is what you were asking for? Best, Marc On Monday,