Am Dienstag, 10. September 2019 13:26:56 UTC+2 schrieb Bruno Blais:
>
> I second Wolfgang comment on the fact that Q1Q1 is not difficult to
> implement. You can also scale it to arbitrary Qn-Qn elements if you are
> interested in higher order.
> We have implemented such an approach in our code
Am Dienstag, 10. September 2019 13:26:56 UTC+2 schrieb Bruno Blais:
>
> I second Wolfgang comment on the fact that Q1Q1 is not difficult to
> implement. You can also scale it to arbitrary Qn-Qn elements if you are
> interested in higher order.
> We have implemented such an approach in our code
Dear Wolfgang,
Thank you very much for looking taking the time to answer my question,
I really appreciate it - such things do not happen to often on the
internet! ; )
Please find below my response per answer, I hope it is not too unstructured
that way!
Am Dienstag, 10. September 2019 06:03:27
I second Wolfgang comment on the fact that Q1Q1 is not difficult to
implement. You can also scale it to arbitrary Qn-Qn elements if you are
interested in higher order.
We have implemented such an approach in our code based on dealii (
https://github.com/lethe-cfd/lethe)
Q1Q1 is already very
On 9/9/19 1:57 AM, Richard Schussnig wrote:
>
> FINALLY, MY QUESTIONS:
>
> Using the Q1Q1, I would in the end (FSI) need to come up with a space made
> from Q1 elements with a discontinuity at the interface - which shall be
> realized using different material_id(). - how may I do that other
Hi everyone!
I am trying to implement the stabilizations presented in a paper by Bochev
et al. [2006],
which you may find here:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/47be/4e317d4dcbbf1b70c781394e49c1dbf7e538.pdf
This one is parameter free, and they present local projections for both
Q1Q1 and Q1Q0
