[deal.II] Re: Parallelizing step-33 with MPI

I did eventually solve this problem, but I ran into another one. I think I'm close, I just need a little guidance. The problems occur in assembling the system. I've checked the right-hand side vector and it has some odd features. I'm running the "slide" problem, just like step-33 does. I

Re: [deal.II] Solve for eigenvalues for small matrix in serial

On 12/19/19 8:23 PM, Pai Liu wrote: > In my parallel code, I want to solve the eigenvalues of a small matrix (e.g. > 3 > by 3) in serial on each processor. In addition to Jean-Paul's answer, if your 3x3 matrix is symmetric, you can also put the entries into an object of type

Re: [deal.II] Why did the developers of deal.ii choose templates over variadic arguments?

Krishna, > deal.ii makes heavy use of templates for spatial-dimension independent > programming.  However, as already acknowledged in the FAQ, compiling > template-heavy code takes a long time. > > Since the number cases are only 3 (possible spatial dimensions), it strikes > me > that the

Re: [deal.II] Re: Parallelizing step-33 with MPI

On 12/20/19 6:42 PM, Ellen M. Price wrote: > I did eventually solve this problem, but I ran into another one. I think I'm > close, I just need a little guidance. The problems occur in assembling the > system. I've checked the right-hand side vector and it has some odd features. > I'm running

[deal.II] Re: cmake with library and executables

Hello deal.ii community, I am posting again (sorry) with a bit more info since I did not find the mistake in my cmake setup. I have essentially the following project structure: project/source project/include project/doc project/test. In project/ I have this CMakeLists.txt:

[deal.II] Why did the developers of deal.ii choose templates over variadic arguments?

With the highest deference to the amazing quality of software development that deal.ii developers follow, I wish to ask a question about the particular development paradigm chosen (with no disrespect to any of the developers intended). This question is just out of personal curiosity. deal.ii

Re: [deal.II] Re: Why did the developers of deal.ii choose templates over variadic arguments?

Hi Bruno, Thank you for your really quick reply. I shall read the article. Krishna On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 13:41, Bruno Turcksin wrote: > Krishna, > > You can find an extensive discussion on the design choices made here > . I think section 2.4

[deal.II] Re: Why did the developers of deal.ii choose templates over variadic arguments?

Krishna, You can find an extensive discussion on the design choices made here . I think section 2.4 answers your question. The short answer is that using template makes the code run faster because the compiler can do a better job at optimizing everything

Re: [deal.II] Symbol dealii not resolved

Dear Gerald, This is great to hear! You are most welcome. Thanks, David On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:50 AM Gerald Marewo wrote: > > Dear David and everyone, > > Here is an update and my way of saying that my problem has been completely > solved. > > Upon watching Wolfgang's Lecturer video 8.01

Re: [deal.II] Symbol dealii not resolved

Dear David and everyone, Here is an update and my way of saying that my problem has been completely solved. Upon watching Wolfgang's Lecturer video 8.01 now I understand that: 1. I created a new c++ project from scratch inside Eclipse and I told Eclipse where to find the include files.