Re: [deal.II] GMesh 1D mesh input error

2020-06-24 Thread Victoria W.
Hi David, Thank you for getting back to me. I've tried with a .inp mesh produced by both gmsh and freeCAD, but I get the same error with my .inp gmsh export and when I use the FreeCAD export I have to use the read_abaqus() read in method which has been giving me a bad_alloc error message. I

Re: [deal.II] GMesh 1D mesh input error

2020-06-24 Thread luca.heltai
This may be a problem with your physical ids. Can you remove all physical ids from the geo file, and try to export a “bare” mesh, without material id/boundary id information? I currently use vtk for all my needs. L. > On 24 Jun 2020, at 14:53, Victoria W. wrote: > > Hi David, > > Thank

[deal.II] Re: error while installing dealii

2020-06-24 Thread simon...@gmail.com
Hi, In your first sceenshot you can see this error message: "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory" >From your other screenshots it looks like you are running ubuntu in a virtual box. If that is the case, I would expect that increasing the RAM of your virtual machine will fix the

Re: [deal.II] Re: error while installing dealii

2020-06-24 Thread ME20S001 Bardawal Prakash
Thanks, I will try with that modification On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, 5:05 PM simon...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > In your first sceenshot you can see this error message: > > "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory" > > From your other screenshots it looks like you are running ubuntu in a >

Re: [deal.II] Geometric Conservation Law

2020-06-24 Thread Martin Kronbichler
Dear Alex, Great! I would suggest to start by simply adding new code to the maybe_update_q_points_Jacobians_... function with the option to turn it off or on. Depending on how the final implementation will look like we might want to move that to a separate place, but I think it will be less

Re: [deal.II] GMesh 1D mesh input error

2020-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 6/24/20 6:53 AM, Victoria W. wrote: Thank you for getting back to me.  I've tried with a .inp mesh produced by both gmsh and freeCAD, but I get the same error with my .inp gmsh export and when I use the FreeCAD export I have to use the read_abaqus() read in method which has been giving me

[deal.II] New deal.II 9.2.0 package for MAC

2020-06-24 Thread luca.heltai
Dear All, there has been an issue with the deal.II Package which I hope I was able to resolve. The new mac package is in the same place of the old one https://github.com/dealii/dealii/releases/download/v9.2.0/dealii-9.2.0.dmg Would anyone with a mac try it out and tell me if they can run

Re: [deal.II] GMesh 1D mesh input error

2020-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
Victoria, That was the file I wanted to use - I also tried this 2D mesh in 3D space attached.  What is a type 15 entity and why did it cause an error?  The same error appeared to be in this .msh file as well. As mentioned before, it may be possible to remove the "physical entity" things

Re: [deal.II] GMesh 1D mesh input error

2020-06-24 Thread Victoria W.
Hi Wolfgang, That was the file I wanted to use - I also tried this 2D mesh in 3D space attached. What is a type 15 entity and why did it cause an error? The same error appeared to be in this .msh file as well. Thank you and all the best, Victoria On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 10:57:11

[deal.II] Understanding slightly cryptic warnings from modified Step-52 code

2020-06-24 Thread Krishnakumar Gopalakrishnan
Hi, I am solving the basic diffusion equation using the direct method (based on Step-52). I have made the following changes from Step-52 tutorial 1. The domain is now 1D (as opposed to 2D in step-52) 2. We have Neumann BCs on both ends (left NeumannBC = 0.5, right NeumannBC= 0) 3. Removes the

Re: [deal.II] Understanding slightly cryptic warnings from modified Step-52 code

2020-06-24 Thread Krishnakumar Gopalakrishnan
Dear Prof Bangerth, Ah. That now was helpful. Thank you! A scrolling screenful of warnings which wrap across multiple lines is pretty intimidating for those not so comfortable with C++. Hi all, Is there a tutorial or general online resource that folks here would recommend for debugging?

Re: [deal.II] Understanding slightly cryptic warnings from modified Step-52 code

2020-06-24 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 6/24/20 3:14 PM, Krishnakumar Gopalakrishnan wrote: Hi, I am solving the basic diffusion equation using the direct method (based on Step-52). I have made the following changes from Step-52 tutorial 1. The domain is now 1D (as opposed to 2D in step-52) 2. We have Neumann BCs on both ends