August 29



ARKANSAS----female faces death penalty

Death penalty sought for couple in killing of 11-year-old Arkansas boy by Dale Ellis



A Star City couple accused of capital murder in the death of their 11-year-old son will face the death penalty if convicted, according to a notice filed by the prosecuting attorney for Jefferson and Lincoln counties.

In the notice, prosecutor Kyle Hunter said the death penalty is justified in the case because the "murder was committed in an especially cruel or depraved manner" and "was committed against a person whom the defendant knew was especially vulnerable," referring to the victim's age at the time of the killing.

"In our opinion, we just believe that, based on the nature of this crime, that [the death] penalty is justified," Hunter told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

David Black, 38, and Mary Black, 30, the boy's stepfather and mother, were charged in the death of Joseph Carsello, whose body was found by Star City police on June 16 inside a residence at 212 Spring St., according to a probable cause affidavit filed in Lincoln County District Court in July. Star City is about 25 miles southeast of Pine Bluff.

The affidavit said Mary Black told police that she and David Black had whipped Joseph with belts on June 15 as punishment for trying to run away. As the whipping was happening, Joseph began talking back to his mother, the affidavit said, and the Blacks responded by striking him in the face with their hands.

The boy's mother told police that Joseph pulled away from them and kicked his stepfather in the mouth, causing David Black's lip to bleed, before falling down some stairs and striking his head on a toolbox, according to the affidavit.

David Black told police that he "spanked the s*** out of Joseph" on the evening of June 15, the affidavit said. He told police that while he was spanking Joseph, the boy rolled over and kicked him in the mouth, busting his lip, it said. Black told police, "That's why his butt looked the way it did," according to the affidavit.

The next day, according to Mary Black, Joseph picked up a hammer and swung it at David Black, the affidavit said. Mary Black said she and her husband then "went a little crazy on him to teach him not to swing a hammer," according to the affidavit.

The Blacks began whipping Joseph with their hands, belts and a paddle and told him to go stand in the corner, according to the affidavit. Mary Black told police that they noticed Joseph lying on the floor a short time later, and the couple began pouring water on him to try to wake him up, the affidavit said.

An autopsy revealed that Joseph died from multiple blunt-force injuries. The boy had multiple scalp contusions; multiple impact sites on his head and torso; bruising of his arms, legs, thighs, and buttocks; abdominal hemorrhaging; hemorrhaging of the pancreas; and a lacerated liver.

David Black is being held in the Lincoln County jail without bail. He is being defended by Little Rock-based attorneys George Morledge IV and Robby Golden.

Mary Black is being held without bail in neighboring Arkansas County because Lincoln County lacks any facilities to hold female detainees. It is not known whether she is represented by an attorney yet.

If Mary Black were convicted and a death sentence were carried out, she would be only the second woman to be put to death in Arkansas in modern times, said Dina Tyler, spokeswoman for Arkansas Department of Correction.

Christina Marie Riggs was executed on May 2, 2000, after being convicted of murdering her two children, Justin Thomas and Shelby Riggs, at the family's Sherwood home in November 1997.

Tyler said that if the pair were convicted and sentenced to death, then David Black would be housed on death row at Varner Supermax Unit, located 28 miles south of Pine Bluff along U.S. 65, and Mary Black would be housed in an isolation unit at the McPherson Unit, located at Newport.

According to court records, both David and Mary Black are scheduled to appear in Lincoln County Circuit Court on Oct. 7 for an omnibus hearing and on Nov. 14 for jury trial. Circuit Judge Alex Guynn is scheduled to preside over the case.

(source: nwaonline.com)








COLORADO:

Colorado Taxpayers Paid DA’s Office $1.6 Million for Unsuccessfully Pursuing Death Penalty Against Wishes of Victim’s Family



A more than $1.6 million price tag for prosecuting a Colorado death-penalty case that the victim’s family opposed and that resulted in a life sentence has caused some Coloradans to question whether capital prosecutions are worth the cost. On August 14, 2019, Miguel Contreras-Perez was sentenced to life in prison after he pleaded guilty to the murder of a correctional officer and the attempted murder of another officer. The sentence came 7 years after the murder and after Colorado reimbursed local prosecutors for legal costs in excess of $1.6 million accumulated during the course of prosecuting the case.

James Bullock, District Attorney for Colorado’s 16th Judicial District, sought the death penalty against Contreras-Perez for the murder of Colorado Department of Corrections Sergeant Mary Ricard at a state prison. When Bullock announced his intention to seek the death penalty, Ricard’s family vociferously objected. Ricard’s daughter, Kate Smith, told reporters “I don’t agree with the death penalty. We’ve had many, many meetings with Mr. Bullock asking him not to seek the death penalty.”

State law allows Bullock’s office to bill the Department of Corrections for the cost of the prosecution, and a public records request revealed that the department paid the district attorney’s office $1.665 million between October 2012 and July 1, 2019. Defense billing records contain legally privileged material that exempt them from disclosure under Colorado’s public records law, so there is no estimate of the total cost of this case. However, studies in jurisdictions across the country have found that capital prosecutions are much more expensive to defend and prosecute than non-capital cases.

In a guest post for the Colorado Independent, civil rights lawyer Faisal Salahuddin noted that “Colorado imposes the death penalty on fewer of its death-eligible defendants than any other state” and has executed just one person for the more than 8,100 murders committed in the state during the past half-century. “While Mr. Bullock’s quixotic jousting in pursuit of the death penalty might yield him some votes at election time,” Salahuddin wrote, “it will be all Coloradans – and not just taxpayers in his judicial district – who will foot the bill. Money wasted in a futile endeavor could have been spent on a variety of ways to combat crime, and on rehabilitative services and grief counseling.”

Smith summarized the impact of the failed capital prosecution on the Ricard family. “I am disgusted with the justice system,” she said. “Colorado’s justice system is neither swift nor just.”

(source: Death Penalty Information Center)








CALIFORNIA:

LA man charged with capital murder in LA Skid Row burning death



A Los Angeles man accused of intentionally setting a tent ablaze on skid row, killing a homeless man, was charged Wednesday with capital murder.

Jonathan Early, 38, scheduled to be arraigned Wednesday afternoon in a downtown Los Angeles courtroom in connection with the death of Dwayne Fields, 62.

The murder charge includes the special circumstance allegation of murder involving the infliction of torture, according to the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office.

Prosecutors will decide later whether to seek the death penalty against Early.

Early allegedly set the tent ablaze near Sixth and San Pedro streets on Monday night and was taken into custody a short time later. Fields died the following morning as a result of his injuries.

Police have not disclosed a motive for the attack, which remains under investigation by the Los Angeles Police Department’s Robbery-Homicide Division and the Los Angeles City Fire Department’s Arson/Counter-Terrorism Section.

(source: Los Angeles Daily News)

*****************

Death Penalty to Be Sought for Mom, Boyfriend Charged In 10-Year-Old’s Death



The prosecution announced Wednesday that the death penalty will be sought against a Lancaster woman and her boyfriend, who are charged with the torture-murder of her 10-year-old son.

Heather Barron, 29, and Kareem Leiva, 33, remain jailed without bail in connection with the June 21, 2018, death of her son, Anthony Avalos.

Prosecutors allege that Anthony was severely tortured during the last 5 or 6 days of his life by his mother and Leiva. The alleged abuse included whipping the boy with a belt and a looped cord, pouring hot sauce on his face and mouth, holding him by his feet and dropping him on his head repeatedly, according to a prosecution court filing.

Earlier this month, relatives of the youngster announced a lawsuit against Los Angeles County, accusing the county and multiple social workers of failing to properly respond to reports of abuses of Anthony — and his siblings. The Los Angeles Superior Court suit filed on behalf of Anthony’s father, aunt, uncle and 6 half-siblings requests damages in excess of $50 million.

Speaking to reporters, Barron tearfully repeated the family’s contention that the Department of Children and Family Services failed to protect her nephew, alleging that if social workers “would have done their jobs when we called and told them what was going on, we wouldn’t be here today.”

She said her nephew “would probably be trying out for band, starting 6th grade.”

(source: mynewsla.com)








OREGON:

Brown will call special session on death penalty----Lawmakers want to fix new law



Gov. Kate Brown plans to convene lawmakers next month in a bid to end outcry over recent far-reaching changes to Oregon’s death penalty laws.

Facing blowback from district attorneys and crime victim groups — and with the approval of even the new law’s chief proponents — Brown signaled Wednesday that she’ll call a narrowly focused special session in September. Legislators are already scheduled to be in Salem from Sept. 16 to Sept. 18 to conduct routine business.

“I am willing to support a legislative session,” Brown said. “Given the seriousness of the issues that we’re dealing with and the impact on victims and families, I think it’s critically important that there be clarity about the law.”

Brown made clear her support is contingent on lawmakers bringing forth a proposal and getting “the votes to make it happen.”

“Should that be accomplished, I will call a special session before the end of September,” she said.

The session would be aimed at correcting elements of Senate Bill 1013, which sought to reduce use of the death penalty in Oregon. By amending the definition of aggravated murder, the state’s only capital crime, the bill narrowed the situations in which prosecutors can seek the death penalty.

Crimes eligible for a death sentence under the bill include: premeditated murder of a child younger than 14; premeditated murder of a law enforcement officer; terrorist attacks that kill at least two people; and murders in prison by someone previously convicted of murder.

In urging passage of SB 1013 earlier this year, lawmakers insisted repeatedly that it would not be retroactive, implying it would have no impact on old cases. But that may not be accurate — a Washington County judge recently deemed a former death row inmate ineligible for the death penalty.

The defendant in that case, Martin Johnson, had previously been convicted of raping and murdering a 15-year-old girl in 1998, but was granted a new trial by the Oregon Supreme Court. Under the new law, the crime Johnson is accused of committing would not qualify as aggravated murder.

The ruling led lawyers with the Oregon Department of Justice to reexamine their understanding of SB 1013, and acknowledge in an Aug. 9 email that the department had misled state prosecutors about the bill’s likely impacts. The Oregonian has reported that this new understanding could have far-reaching implications for Oregon’s death row inmates.

In response, the state’s district attorneys, who opposed the bill, called on lawmakers to make changes.

The revelation also spurred reaction from the bill’s biggest legislative champions, state Sen. Floyd Prozanski, D-Eugene, and Rep. Jennifer Williamson, D-Portland.

Prozanski announced that he’d never intended the bill to be so sweeping, and called on the governor to convene a special session.

Williamson, on the other hand, said the law is working as intended. She said the new definition of aggravated murder should be used when inmates are granted new trials or sentencing hearings, and says the law is not retroactive because it cannot change the outcomes for defendants who have satisfied all of their options for appeal and post-conviction relief.

Despite that stance, Williamson sent a letter to Brown and legislative leadership over the weekend signaling she would support a special session.

“I made a commitment to the family of one of the victims impacted this week that I would inform each of you that I would support Senator Prozanski’s efforts to change the bill he drafted,” Williamson wrote, even as she defended her stance on the bill.

She added that she would use a special session to demand increased funding for victims of domestic and sexual violence — a move some viewed as disingenuous and which Brown said extends beyond the scope of a special session.

Asked Wednesday how much blame her office shouldered for the confusion behind the SB 1013, Brown told reporters there were “a lot of people involved in this bill. I think we all share some responsibility.”

Assuming a special session is convened, it would be Brown’s second as governor. In May 2018, she called a one-day special session for lawmakers to tweak Oregon’s tax code.

(source: The Daily Astorian)

*********************

Oregon lawmakers work to clarify new death penalty law----Oregon lawmakers are trying to clarify a controversial law that reclassifies what crimes warrant the death penalty. Oregon Gov. Kate Brown said Wednesday she wants to call a special session.



Oregon Gov. Kate Brown said Wednesday she wants to call a special session of the Legislature because of questions raised whether a new law which narrows death penalty cases is retroactive.

With the new law taking effect next month, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum also said she supports a special legislative session “to make sure our courts, prosecutors, defenders, victims and others have the clarity and guidance they need in connection with our most serious criminal cases.”

“We must make sure we get this law right,” Rosenblum said.

The bill narrows the state’s use of the death penalty by substantially limiting the crimes that qualify.

After Brown signed the bill on Aug. 1, lawyers for Martin Allen Johnson, who authorities say raped and murdered a 15-year-old girl in 1998 before throwing her body off a bridge, raised the issue of whether the new law applies to him.

A judge determined the crime no longer qualifies as aggravated murder under the new law. Other cases could be affected.

The new state law that takes effect Sept. 29 narrows the definition of aggravated murder, the only crime eligible for a death sentence. The law states that aggravated murder is limited to killing 2 or more people as an act of organized terrorism; killing a child younger than 14 intentionally and with premeditation; killing another person while locked incarcerated for a previous murder; or killing a police, correctional or probation officer.

House Republican Leader Carl Wilson said repealing the bill might be the best course in a special session, allowing ample time before the 2020 regular session to analyze the issue.

“The last thing we should do in this situation is quickly rush something through a compressed process,” Wilson said. “We do not want to compound the existing mistake by rushing a ‘fix’ through a daylong session in a hastily assembled committee.”

Brown, a Democrat, told reporters in a conference call that she expects Sen. Floyd Prozanski, a Democrat from the university town of Eugene who helped get the bill passed, to work with others to craft language to address the law’s retroactivity. Then she would call a special session, expected to last less than a day in September.

Prozanski said Wednesday it is imperative to move forward with a special session to provide a fix to the bill. It should clarify that it “only applies to offenses committed on or after the effective date,” Prozanski said. He is recommending a special session occur when the Legislature is already scheduled, from Sept. 16-18.

Wilson, who voted against the bill that passed in the House by a 33-26 vote, said Wednesday he prefers that any changes to the death penalty be referred to voters via a ballot measure.

Brown has extended a 2011 moratorium on the death penalty. The last execution in the state took place in 1997. The death penalty remains legal in 29 states, but only a handful regularly conduct executions.

Nationwide, 1,500 people have been executed since 1976.

(source: Associated Press)
_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to