April 17 TEXAS: Controversial Revelation of Death Penalty Injustice, Last Words from Death Row, Scheduled for Release in April 2007 Nightengale Press will release Last Words from Death Row written by Norma Herrera in April 2007. Norma Herrera lived her brother Leonel Herrera's personal hell as he waited on Death Row for the courts to decide if the new evidence that proved his innocence would save his life. To fulfill her last promise to Leo -- to tell his story, to tell the truth -- Ms. Herrera has authored Last Words from Death Row. In Last Words from Death Row (Nightengale Press, ISBN 1-933449-29-2, $19.95) Ms. Herrera writes: On February 16, 1992, Applicant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. He showed that he had important and compelling evidence of his innocence and argued that because of his innocence it would violate the United States Constitution to execute him. ... Collins v. Herrera, 754 F.2d 1029 (5th Cir. 1992). The Fifth Circuit held that, based upon Supreme Court precedent, innocence did not provide a basis for federal habeas corpus relief. In 1993, the court ruled in Herrera vs. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993) that a prisoner cannot simply argue in federal court that new evidence points to his innocence. He first must prove that his trial contained procedural errors (the technicalities that may free the guilty but also protect the innocent). In this case, Leonel Herrera had been convicted of shooting two police officers. Ten years later, he submitted affidavits from witnesses who said that his now-dead brother had been the killer (one witness was his brother's son, who says he saw the murders). Without considering the statements, the court told Herrera to sit down and shut up. "Federal habeas courts do not sit to correct errors of fact but to ensure the individuals are not imprisoned in violation of the Constitution," it said. In other words, being falsely imprisoned is not a violation of your rights. Herrera was executed four months after the ruling. Last Words from Death Row documents court events and press coverage, and calls into question the landmark decisions that sent her brother to his death. In the book, Ms. Herrera recounts the tribulations she and her family suffered as they worked to free Leonel Herrera from his fate. In his last words, Leonel Herrera said: "I am innocent, innocent, innocent. I am an innocent man, and something very wrong is taking place tonight." If all the court proceedings, including the Supreme Court's decision prior to Leo's execution represent the visible tip of the death penalty iceberg, Last Words from Death Row exposes the enormous human tragedy that resides below the surface. Her questions drive a powerful wedge between the legal process in capital cases and the truth. Why do the guilty go unpunished? When is innocence not enough to free a convicted man? Does Truth not prevail in the American Justice system? Who pays? Who is next? Last Words from Death Row will be available through Nightengale Press (www.nightengalepress.com), through online retailers and better bookstores in April. For more information, or to interview Ms. Herrera, contact Valerie Connelly at (847) 810-8498. (source: PRWEB) ****************************** Supreme Court Refuses San Antonio Man's Death Row Appeal A convicted killer condemned for an attack in which 2 of the 3 murder victims were injected with household cleaner before they were stabbed to death lost an appeal Monday at the U.S. Supreme Court, moving him closer to execution. The court refused to hear appeals from Clifford Kimmel of San Antonio and 2 other Texas death row inmates -- Lionell Rodriguez, a Houston man convicted of a notorious fatal carjacking, and Christopher Coleman, condemned for a triple slaying in Houston. Rodriguez is scheduled to die by lethal injection on June 20. Neither Kimmel nor Coleman has a pending execution date. Kimmel and another man, Derek Murphy, were arrested for the April 1999 fatal stabbings of Rachel White and Susan Halverstadt, both 22 and dancers at a topless bar, and Brett Roe, 29. Their bodies were found in a San Antonio apartment. Kimmel, who had a previous burglary conviction, was arrested about 6 weeks later for a parole violation and confessed to police. Court records show he and Murphy injected two of their victims with the cleaner Tilex to drug them before they robbed them. Kimmel pleaded guilty to capital murder, and a jury decided he should be executed. A defense psychiatrist testified at his trial the Kimmel, now 31, had been a heavy user of methamphetamines since he was 13 or 14. Kimmel's companion, Murphy, is serving a life prison term for his role in the slayings. Rodriguez is set to die for the 1990 shooting death of Tracy Gee, a 22-year-old woman gunned down while in her car at a stoplight. He was 19 at the time of the shooting and on parole only 3 weeks after serving 3 months of a 7-year sentence for burglary. The random nature of the slaying put an intense spotlight on Houston street crime at the time. Gee was returning from work and was only a few blocks from home when she was shot in the head while waiting for a light to change. She was pulled from her car and dumped in the street as her attacker drove away, running over her. Evidence showed Rodriguez, who had a long criminal history, drove around for about 2 hours in the car, which was splattered with blood and bone fragments, and was sitting in a pool of her blood when he was arrested near his home in Rosenberg in adjacent Fort Bend County. At his trial, jurors heard his confession where he said he wanted the woman's car because his was just about out of gasoline. Rodriguez, now 36, first was convicted in 1991 but the conviction was thrown out because a list of potential jurors improperly was shuffled twice when the law said it could be shuffled only once. He was retried in 1994, convicted again and sentenced a 2nd time to death. In the other Houston case, Coleman, 35, was condemned for the shooting deaths of 3 people in December 1995 in what was supposed to be a fake robbery scheme involving a Colombian cocaine peddler. Herimar Prado Hurtado, Jesus Garcia-Castro and Hurtado's 3-year-old nephew, Danny Giraldo, were killed when evidence showed Coleman fired 11 times into a car. According to testimony, Coleman was paid $12,000 to take part in a scheme hatched by Genero Garcia so Garcia wouldn't have to pay an $80,000 drug debt. Garcia and another man, Derrick Graham, received life prison terms for their role in the plot. Garcia-Castro's girlfriend, the dead child's mother, also was shot in the attack but survived her wounds and identified Coleman as the gunman. Coleman was arrested in Lawrenceburg, Tenn., where he acknowledged being at the shooting site but denied being the gunman. (source: WOAI News) ********************* System repair "For centuries the death penalty, often accompanied by barbarous refinements, has been trying to hold crime in check; yet crime persists," (Albert Camus, Resistance, Rebellion and Death). These words of Albert Camus, an Algerian-French author and philosopher, best sum up my position on the death penalty and the prison system. The death penalty is one of the most controversial issues of our time and it garners opinions from people in all walks of life. I say it with a little hesitation that I am against the death penalty. The death penalty and the prison system are both intrinsically flawed. The old adage "two wrongs do not make a right," is the first thing that comes to mind when I think of the death penalty. As sad as it is to say, when someone is murdered, nothing will ever bring that person back. I do not believe that seeing the murderer die by lethal injection or any other method will bring closure to the family of the victim. Anyone who says that it does is either lying or trying to fool themselves. The hole will always be there if a family member is taken away violently. Nothing will ever make things right again. According to the Web site www.balancedpolitics.org, there are some legitimate reasons to ban the death penalty in the United States. It clogs our legal system with appeals for inmates who have received the death sentence. The financial cost of capital punishment is several times greater than that of locking the inmate up for life. The death penalty has been in place for about as long as our nation has existed and it still has not scared potential criminals straight. This may be because the method of execution has become more humane as time has gone on. Life in prison is a more severe punishment and it is also a more effective deterrent. The death penalty sends contradictory messages in several different ways. First of all, it sends the wrong message that it is all right to kill a person who has murdered someone else to prove that killing is wrong. It does not take an Ivy League graduate to figure out that there is no logic in that. Second, it takes sympathy away from the victim and the victim's family and places it on the perpetrator of the crime. Here is where the hesitation comes in on my part and I really could spend many sleepless nights pondering on the situation. How would I feel if someone murdered a member of my family? Honestly, I cannot answer that question. Perhaps I would want to see him pay for the crime he has committed by watching him hang from the tallest tree in the world. Or maybe I would want him to have the rest of his life to think about his crime in prison. That being said, I believe there is another factor that should be taken into consideration. The prison system is flawed in our country. In Texas, there is not even the option of life without parole. The prison system has gone too soft. With all the human rights activists getting prisoners equal treatment, prison is not as scary anymore. It has lost a little of the intimidation. I am not condoning beat-downs of prisoners like those that occurred in the movie "Shawshank Redemption," but maybe if they mess up again in prison, give them a few days in solitary confinement and see if it gives them a new lease on life. They are already in prison for crimes on the outside. Misbehavior inside the walls should be punished a little more severely. Some criminals might even find that they would have a better life inside the prison than outside of it. Think about it, inside prison they will always have, clean clothes, shelter, three meals a day, some form of employment and the possibility of education. These are things that are no guarantees on the outside, especially for potential criminals. It has been proven that some innocent men and women have been put to death under capital punishment. It might help the United States gain more respect in the international community if the nation moves away from the "eye for an eye" revenge approach. Who are we, as a nation, to judge whether other men should live or die? Some are truly apologetic for their crimes, and others feel no remorse or deny that they committed the crime. When we sentence a guilty man or woman to die, perhaps, we are no better than they are. (source: Houstonian) ****************************** Falkenberg: At least Dallas County gives 2nd chances New columnists: While columnist Rick Casey is on sabbatical for the next few months, we are delighted to bring Chronicle readers 2 sharp new voices: Lisa Falkenberg, a 5th-generation Texan from Seguin who joined the Chronicle's Austin bureau in 2005, will appear on Tuesdays and Fridays. Falkenberg has worked for The Associated Press, where she was Texas AP Writer of the Year, and has covered everything from scandals in the state lottery to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Lisa Gray, who has been arts editor of the Chronicle since 2005, will appear on Sundays and Thursdays. Gray is a talented columnist and editor who has also worked at the Houston Press, Washington City Paper and Cite: The Architectural and Design Review of Houston. One look at James Curtis Giles on our front page with his cobalt blue suit, smiling, relieved eyes, his sister gripping his shoulder like a battle buddy returning from the field has me both thrilled and furious. Thrilled because for the 1st time in a quarter-century, the world knows 53-year-old Giles is an innocent man, no longer the scum-of-the-earth sex offender convicted in the brutal gang rape of a pregnant 18-year-old. Furious because he likely will be the 13th man proven by DNA testing to have been wrongly convicted in Dallas County. 23. That's more DNA exonerations than any county in the nation. Harris County has had only 4. What's wrong with the justice system in Dallas? Is it really that much worse than ours? Harris County had tainted evidence and sloppy record-keeping from a leaky police crime lab. Both counties have shared reputations for what critics call a "conviction-at all-costs" mentality. And Harris, the so-called death penalty capital of the world, is a lot more populous. So, assuming Harris has its fair share of bad lawyers, overzealous cops and mistaken eyewitnesses, why aren't we seeing the same parade of exonerations? The main answer is simple: Dallas is a pack rat, keeping evidence dating back to the 1980s in catalogued freezers of a county-run lab; Harris County is not. It's not that Dallas' policy was born of benevolent foresight: It likely was intended to aid prosecutors in fighting appeals. But enter Craig Watkins, the new Democratic district attorney hell-bent on airing his Republican predecessors' sins and busting out the innocent, and you've got a recipe for long-awaited justice. 'Heads in the sand' Harris County is a different story. As we saw in the HPD crime lab debacle, precious evidence like bloody clothing and rape kits got rained on, used up in one test or misplaced. Even the evidence sent to other labs was routinely stored in crowded, dusty warehouses, where exhibits were periodically tossed to make room for more. In 1997, the rape kit that exonerated Kevin Byrd narrowly escaped the trash bin. But a week after his pardon, court officials ordered 50 more rape kits destroyed. Harris County's tossing tendencies are common and legal. Texas law requires evidence to be kept only until a convict is executed, dies or is paroled. Curtis Giles might still be a registered sex offender today if Dallas had followed that minimum standard; he was exonerated 14 years after his parole. Evidence isn't the only obstacle to freeing Harris County's innocent. Critics point to a culture of denial at the office of District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal, who's often painted as the archetypal red meat Texas prosecutor. "I think it's a matter of them burying their heads in the sand so they're not confronted with the possibility they made a mistake," David Dow, director of the University of Houston's Innocence Network, said of Rosenthal's office. "They often don't even answer our letters anymore when we inquire about ... evidence." Rosenthal denied stonewalling: "I'm not going to stand in the way and have someone who's wrongly convicted stay in prison. That's awful," he told me last week. "If we can't be ethical, we can't be anything." To be fair, he was the 1st in 2003 to order retesting of DNA handled by the HPD crime lab. And Nina Morrison, staff attorney for Innocence Project of New York, commends Rosenthal for a new, limited policy allowing her to retest any DNA that was touched by the tainted HPD crime lab. She's gotten permission to test more than five inmates so far, and she expects more. But that doesn't cover all cases. And even if Rosenthal isn't blocking DNA testing, he's not aggressively trying to find the innocent guys, either. When I asked him if there could be innocent people from Harris County in prison, he said, "I'm sure it's plausible." Yet, he says his office supports "very few" requests for post-conviction testing. Compassion for victims How can it be ethical to acknowledge the possible incarceration of innocent people and then do little to find and free them? I admire Rosenthal's compassion for victims; he says he decided long ago that if alleged rape victims braved stigma to come forward, he would stand by them until evidence proved otherwise. Why not the same compassion for victims of incompetent counsel and mistaken eyewitnesses? Rosenthal should follow Watkins' example in Dallas: Throw open his doors to the innocence attorneys and allow them to test whatever evidence exists in disputed cases. He has nothing to lose, except his pride, but much to gain. For every innocent person in prison, there is a murderer or rapist who escaped justice. (source: Houston Chronicle) CONNECTICUT: Judge rejects bid for new lawyers in death penalty case A Superior Court judge has turned down a request for new defense lawyers for a Bridgeport man facing the death penalty. Russell Peeler Jr. was convicted in 2000 of ordering the 1999 killings of a Bridgeport woman and her 8-year-old son to keep the boy from testifying against him in a murder case. Peeler was convicted in the shooting deaths of Karen Clarke, 29, and her son, Leroy "B.J." Brown Jr. The boy was expected to be a key witness against Peeler in the murder of Clarke's boyfriend. The two were gunned down in Clarke's home. A jury deadlocked on whether Peeler should receive the death penalty. He has been in prison since his arrest a few weeks after the murders. In court Monday, Peeler demanded new lawyers, saying the court-appointed defense team is not quality legal representation. "My life is hanging in the balance and I need more quality of defense," Peeler told Judge Jon C. Blue. "These attorneys are not committed, they are acting like agents of the state." But the judge said he considers the three lawyers the state has hired to represent Peeler in the death sentence hearing - Erskine McIntosh, Mark Rademacher and Jeffrey Beck - to be well-qualified and denied Peeler's motion for new lawyers. "I will agree with you on one issue this is absolutely a serious matter, but I would disagree with you about the quality of your attorneys. Your claim that they are agents of the state is preposterous, it is just baloney," Blue said. Judge Blue has set May 1 as the beginning of jury selection. A 12-person jury, with four alternates, will be selected to determine if the death penalty should be imposed on Peeler for his role in the killings. Blue has tentatively scheduled the death penalty hearing to begin Sept. 10. Police claim Peeler ordered his younger brother, Adrian Peeler, to kill the boy and his mother. Adrian Peeler, however, was convicted only of conspiracy to commit murder and sentenced to 20 years in prison. He is also serving a consecutive 35-year term on federal drug charges. (source: Associated Press) ******************** Death row inmates stage hunger strike to protest conditions 5 of the state's eight death row inmates started a hunger strike Monday to protest conditions at Northern Correctional Institution in Somers, a Department of Correction spokesman said. The inmates said in a statement released through an anti-death penalty group that they want to be able to participate in recreation outside their cells with one another rather than alone. Death row inmates spend 23 hours a day in their cells and have 1 hour of solitary recreation. They also asked for additional privileges, including contact visits and use of the gym for recreation, and for a meeting with the commissioner of the Department of Correction. "Death row convicts are suffering from high stress and depression caused by our environment and current living conditions," said the statement, which was written on behalf of the inmates by Eduardo Santiago, on death row for carrying out a murder-for-hire. "We as a group say enough is enough, something has to change. It's been 9 years." Death row inmates staged a similar hunger strike in 2005. It lasted about a week and prison officials said it did not lead them to change their policies. Department spokesman Brian Garnett would not say which inmates were involved in the hunger strike, which started at breakfast Monday, or what action department officials might take if it continues. "Certainly they're being monitored by medical personnel, and we'll see how it progresses," he said. "As I understand, they're concerned about the conditions under which they're being held. We strongly believe that the conditions they're held under are humane and are based upon safety and security needs of not only the institution but of them personally." (source: Associated Press) USA: ACLU Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Fairness in Juror Selection for Death Penalty Cases The American Civil Liberties Union today urged the United States Supreme Court to uphold established constitutional and legal procedures that help to ensure fair jury selection in death penalty cases. The Court will hear arguments today in the case of Cal Coburn Brown, who was sentenced to death in Washington State in 1993. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the death sentence in 2005, ruling that a potential juror had been incorrectly kept from the jury that later found Brown guilty and imposed the death penalty. The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief agreeing with the federal appeals court ruling and arguing that the state court did not properly apply established federal law regarding the qualification of jurors for a capital case trial. "Death is the ultimate punishment. The stakes can't get any higher, so it is of utmost importance that courts pick jurors fairly and in accordance with the law," said ACLU Legal Director Steven R. Shapiro. The standard for selecting jurors in capital cases is whether they can put aside any personal beliefs about the death penalty and fairly apply the law. That standard was not followed in this case, according to the ACLU. Instead, the prosecution was improperly permitted to exclude "for cause" a potential juror who stated that he would consider a defendant's future dangerousness in deciding whether to impose the death penalty, but that he would follow the courts instructions on the law and could vote for the death penalty in an appropriate case even if the alternative were life in prison without parole. "If courts are allowed to dismiss every person who thinks carefully and conscientiously about the death penalty, it would undermine constitutional protections for fair trials in capital cases," said John Holdridge, Director of the ACLU Capital Punishment Project. The ACLU brief was written by Holdridge, Shapiro, and Brian W. Stull of the national ACLU, ACLU of Washington Legal Director Sarah Dunne, ACLU of Washington Staff Attorney Nancy Talner and Larry Yackle of the Boston University School of Law. The ACLU's brief is available at: www.aclu.org/scotus/2006term/uttechtv.brown/29224lgl20070328.html (source: ACLU) NEBRASKA----impending execution Chambers: Execution can't proceed because state didn't follow law State Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha says the execution of Carey Dean Moore should not go forward because the state violated administrative rules. In a memo to Attorney General Jon Bruning and Gov. Dave Heineman, Chambers says the method of execution was changed three years ago without a public hearing and oversight from the attorney general's and governor's offices, as required by law. Bruning said in a statement that his office will review the matter and respond appropriately. "It is a legal question directed at the attorney general, and we will wait on his response," said Heineman spokeswoman Jen Rae Hein. Moore was scheduled to be electrocuted May 8. Death row inmates used to be executed with four separate jolts of electricity on the electric chair. But that was changed in 2004 after Scotts Bluff County District Judge Robert Hippe concluded that protocol violated a state law that requires a continuous application of electricity. Lawyers for inmate Raymond Mata Jr. had challenged the old method in court, and prison officials changed it in 2004. The new protocol calls for a continuous, 15-second current of electricity at 2,450 volts. "If any matter warrants public scrutiny and serious, informed, professional and expert input, a protocol to extinguish a human life by the state, does," Chambers says in his memo. He has provided the information to attorneys for death row inmates, Chambers said, and did not know whether any legal action would occur if Bruning did not intervene based on his memo. In a filing with the state Supreme Court in March, Moore said he was stopping his decades-long fight against the death penalty and wished to be executed. If the execution were to go forward, it would be the 1st in the state since Robert Williams was put to death in 1997. On the Net: Nebraska attorney general: http://www.ago.state.ne.us/ (source: Associated Press) ****************** Death Watch to Begin----Execution set for May 8 Death row inmate Carey Dean Moore goes on death watch as of Tuesday. Guards will monitor the 49-year-old convicted killer until he's transported to Lincoln to be executed on May 8th. Cab drivers Maynard Helgeland and Reuel Van Ness were robbed and murdered within a week's time. Now, 28 years later, their killer has given up legal efforts to halt his execution. His friends stand vigil outside the capitol. They say Moore is no longer the cold blooded killer he once was. Norma Fleisher says, "He's a born again Christian. He's a kind an mild person." Crowds were rowdy during the nighttime executions of Willie Otey and John Joubert in the mid-1990s. Moore's execution is scheduled to take place at 10 a.m. Walkthroughs will be conducted by penitentiary staff starting a week prior to the execution. Death row was moved to Tecumseh but the execution chamber was not. That's so the guards that guard the condemned on death row don't have to deal with the actual execution. That too goes back to lessons learned during the Otey and Joubert executions. Win Barber with the Nebraska Department of Corrections says, "When the time of the execution occurred there were some feelings, for lack of a better word, on the part of the staff. These are condemned inmates but we had known them for a long time." The executioner who carries out the sentence will not be identified. Fran Kaye, with Nebraskans Against the Death Penalty says, "Nothing will be gained except people will have something to be ashamed of and remember." Maynard Helgeland's son-in-law will be a witness to the execution. He says he owes it to Maynard's memory and the grandchildren Helgeland never got to see. (source: WOWT News) TENNESSEE: Scene sues for access to records detailing development of new execution protocol The Nashville Scene Tuesday upped its ante against the Department of Correction (DOC), following up a February open records request with a lawsuit asking the Davidson County Chancery Court to intervene on the newspaper's behalf and force the DOC to argue in open court why it must continue to keep records relating to the development of a new execution protocol off limits to the public. The dispute goes back to Feb. 1, when Gov. Phil Bredesen issued Executive Order 43, which directed Correction Commissioner George Little to review the state's lethal injection protocol and, by May 2, to "establish and provide. new protocols and related written procedures for administering death sentences in Tennessee, both by lethal injection and execution." 16 days later, the Scene, under the direction of Editor Liz Garrigan, requested the DOC to turn over to the newspaper all records relating to the development of that new protocol. With the exception of one 40-minute public forum, the DOC has conducted its review entirely behind closed doors, which has drawn the ire of death penalty experts, among other interested parties, who have noted that other states such as Florida and California conducted their death penalty procedures in a more public setting. "The public has a very strong interest in understanding the procedures by which the State of Tennessee puts people to death in its correctional facilities and that the public obtains information about such matters by reading the Nashville Scene and other newspapers, as well as through other media channels," wrote Nashville attorney John P. Williams on behalf of Nashville's largest weekly publication. It was a position that echoed earlier requests made by the Scene, including in its original Feb. 16 letter to Commissioner Little as well as a March 21 follow-up letter to Little and Bredesen. But, as the new lawsuit spells out, the intervention by the State Attorney General's Office, in which it held the position that certain requested documents are "privileged" forced the Scene's hand. Arguing that internal drafts, memos and e-mails relating to the development of a new execution manual are not, in fact, "privileged," the Scene contends that "Commissioner Little has no legitimate interest in concealing from the public the thoughts, ideas and information contained in the requested records and [the Scene] respectfully contend[s] that production of these records will have no chilling effect on persons in the working group, which is preparing the new Execution Manual." Representatives from the State Attorney General's Office, the DOC and the Governor's Office were not immediately available for comment. (source: Nashville City Paper) ********************** Nashville Scene sues state over death penalty protocols Nashville's alt-weekly Nashville Scene has filed a lawsuit in Davidson County Chancery Court against Tennessee's Department of Corrections, seeking to make the state shed some light on its current effort to fine-tune how it puts condemned prisoners to death. According to the Scene's attorney, John P. Williams of the law firm Tune, Entrekin and White, the lawsuit is a result of a open-records request that has been denied by the Department of Corrections and its commissioner, George Little. On February 1 of this year, Gov. Phil Bredesen issued an executive order halting all executions for 90 days so that the Tennessee Department of Corrections could perform "a comprehensive review of the manner in which the death penalty is administered." According to the order issued by the Governor, procedures for both lethal injections and electrocutions would be reviewed by, among others, experts from the legal, scientific, medical, and corrections fields. Additionally the governor has asked that the department review practices of other states. The Nashville Scene has been trying to obtain documents in advance of new protocols being put in place in order to see what the committee appointed by Little is discussing. Scene Editor Liz Garrigan told NashvillePost.com today that she filed a request 2 months ago under Tennessee's open-records law for information on how the new procedures would be developed. Kleinfelter wrote back with a copy of the current execution manual and some other documents, but told Garrigan that some information had been held back on the grounds that it was privileged material relating to policy deliberations. According to the lawsuit, Assistant Attorney General Janet Kleinfelter, representing the Department of Corrections, described some of the withheld documents in her letter as "drafts of the [new execution] manual and the handwritten notes and comments of the individual members of the working group appointed by Commissioner Little, as well as a very limited number of emails between members of this group." "We think the process ought be transparent," Garrigan said today. "We're talking about how we're going to go about killing people in this state. We think that ought to be an open discussion." Sharon Curtis-Flair, spokesperson for the Attorney General's office, said that her office is not at liberty to discuss pending litigation. A hearing has been set in Davdison County Chancery Court for Wednesday, April 25 at 9 a.m. Chancellor Claudia Bonnyman will hear the complaint. (source: Nashville Post)
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, CONN., USA, NEB., TENN.
Rick Halperin Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:02:19 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)