[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS

2017-10-12 Thread Rick Halperin





Oct. 12




TEXASexecution

Texas executes man convicted of killing prison guard with shank

Texas executed a man on Thursday convicted of murdering a prison guard in 1999, 
after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a last-minute appeal to spare his life 
despite arguments by his lawyers that he was innocent.


Robert Pruett, 38, was put to death by lethal injection at the state’s death 
chamber in Huntsville and pronounced dead at 6:46 p.m. (2346 GMT), the Texas 
Department of Criminal Justice said. He was the 544th person executed in Texas 
since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, the most of 
any state. It was Texas' 6th execution this year.


"I've hurt a lot of people and a lot of people have hurt me. I love ya'll so 
much. Life don't end here it goes on forever. I've had to learn lessons in life 
the hard way. One day there won't be a need to hurt people," Pruett was quoted 
as saying in his last statement by the criminal justice department.


About an hour before the scheduled execution, the Supreme Court said it 
rejected Pruett's petition. It did not provide a reason.


Pruett, sent to prison as a teenager and serving a 99-year sentence as an 
accessory to a murder committed by his father, was convicted of killing prison 
guard Daniel Nagle by stabbing him repeatedly with a shank.


The Nagle family said in a statement released by the department: "Though it has 
been over 18 years since he was taken from us, we still miss Daniel every day 
and the execution will in no way minimize our loss."


Prosecutors said he murdered the corrections officer because Nagle had 
reprimanded him for carrying a sandwich into the recreation yard. Torn pieces 
of the disciplinary report on Pruett were found near Nagle’s body.


“No witnesses testified they observed the attack, and no physical evidence 
connected Robert Pruett to the murder,” Pruett’s lawyers wrote in their 
petition to the Supreme Court filed on Tuesday.


They said Pruett, who has maintained his innocence, was convicted on the 
unreliable testimony of prison informants and that neither Pruett’s 
fingerprints nor DNA material were found on the torn report. Lawyers had also 
asked the state to release the shank and Nagle’s clothes for DNA testing after 
inconclusive tests took place in 2000.


In a legal filing with the Supreme Court, the state of Texas said: “Pruett has 
raised nothing new that casts any doubt on his guilt.”


Pruett becomes the 6th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in Texas 
and the 544th overall since the state resumed capital punishment on December 7, 
1982.


Pruett becomes the 20th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in the 
USA and the 1462nd overall since the nation resumed executions on January 17, 
1977.


(sources: Reuters & Rick Halperin)



**






f

http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/death_row/dr_scheduled_executions.html


Executions under Greg Abbott, Jan. 21, 2015-present25

Executions in Texas:  Dec. 7, 1982present-543

Abbott#scheduled execution date-nameTx. #


26-Oct. 18-Anthony Shore-545

27-Oct. 26-Clinton Young--546

28-Nov. 8--Ruben Cardenas---547

29-Nov. 16-Larry Swearingen-548

30Dec. 14-Juan Castillo---549

31Jan. 30-William Rayford550

(sources: TDCJ & Rick Halperin)
___
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty


[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2017-10-12 Thread Rick Halperin





Oct. 13




PAKISTAN:

Executions must not violate rights obligations: HRCP



The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has urged the government to 
urgently institute safeguards to ensure that a generalised resumption of 
executions does not violate Pakistan's human rights obligations.


According to Justice Project Pakistan, 8,200 people are on death row in 
Pakistan and 477 people have been executed since December 2014. As many as 
2,393 Pakistanis were executed in Saudi Arabian jails.


According to the World Coalition against Death Penalty, 104 countries have 
abolished the death penalty for all crimes, 7 countries have abolished the 
death penalty for ordinary crimes and 30 countries are abolitionists in 
practice. According to statistics, 23 countries carried out executions in 2016. 
In 2016, top 5 executioners were China, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.


According to Amnesty International, it is believed that thousands of executions 
took place in 2016.


In Pakistan, executions decreased by 239 in 2016. Indonesia executed 4 people, 
Taiwan 1, Singapore 4, Japan 3 and Malaysia 9. Amnesty has not given any 
estimates for North Korea and Vietnam.


South Eastern countries like Maldives and the Philippines took steps in the 
wrong direction, towards resumptions of executions, after more than 6 decades, 
according to Amnesty International.


In a statement on World Day against the Death Penalty, HRCP said: "As we 
observe the 15th World Day against the Death Penalty, HRCP calls upon the 
government to take stock of the pressing issues that have arisen ever since it 
terminated the moratorium in December 2014.


"In addition to various and well-documented challenges that a generalised 
recourse to capital punishment presents, there is an urgent need to introduce 
safeguards in instances where age of the convict or his or her mental or 
physical ability is in question." Furthermore, the socio-economic status of a 
convict tends to be directly proportional to their risk of being sentenced to 
death and execution. This year the World Day against Death Penalty is bringing 
into focus the link between poverty and capital punishment.


"While HRCP calls upon the government to suspend the death penalty in the 
country as a 1st step towards abolition, it demands that these new issues 
should be urgently addressed through a conscious policy and not merely through 
last minute action in response to pleas from civil society in individual 
cases." HRCP also staged a demo outside the Lahore Press Club.


(source: The Nation)



527 prisoners on death row in Sindh jails



The death warrants of 7 condemned prisoners in Sindh can be issued any time as 
the President of Pakistan has rejected their mercy petitions.


The total number of prisoners currently on death row in Sindh is 527, out of 
which 13 have been awarded capital punishment from military courts, said 
personal staff officer to prisons IG, Shunail Hussain Shah.


Shah added, "The appeals of many prisoners on death row are either pending with 
the high court, Supreme Court or with the President of Pakistan after they have 
been awarded the death penalty by trial courts."


Among such prisoners, 122 have been incarcerated at the Central Jail, Karachi, 
227 in Hyderabad, 135 in Sukkur while 38 are detained in Larkana, Shah 
informed. 4 women on death row are in Karachi jail while 1 other woman is in 
Hyderabad.


According to the prisons department, 18 prisoners have been executed in 
Hyderabad, Sukkur and Karachi since the moratorium on executions was lifted. 
The move came in the wake of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan's attack at the Army 
Public School (APS) in Peshawar in December, 2014.


Prominent prisoners on death row in the prisons of Sindh include the murderer 
of American journalist Daniel Pearl, Omer Saeed Sheikh, Jundullah militant 
Mohammad Qasim Toori who carried out an attack on the convoy of the Karachi 
corps commander in June, 2004, and Azhar Ishrat, who was involved in the 
Safoora bus carnage.


Opposition to death penalty

"Capital punishment is a murder committed by the state and we need to abolish 
it," remarked Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) Vice-Chairperson Asad 
Iqbal Butt, while talking to The Express Tribune.


According to Butt, human life needs to be respected and for this we need to 
reconsider our ways to treat criminals. "The government needs to construct 
healthy society to curb crimes."


Army chief confirms death sentences of 4 'hardcore' terrorists

"The death sentence could only be awarded for 2 felonies, murder and treason, 
before the partition. However, this has swelled to 28 in Pakistan," he 
maintained.


The 15th World Day Against the Death Penalty was observed on Tuesday. Opponents 
of the death penalty organised demonstrations, arguing for its abolishment.


The crime rate cannot be lowered through extreme punishments, Butt opined. The 
40 counties which have abolished 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2017-10-12 Thread Rick Halperin






Oct. 13



GLOBAL:

UN: 170 Countries Abandoned the Death Penalty



The countries that abolished the death penalty have reached 170. 87% of the 
death sentences are carried out in 4 countries. They are Iraq, Iran, Pakistan 
and Saudi Arabia. These figures were released on Tuesday by the United Nations 
on the World Day against the Death Penalty - Oct. 10.


UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres says there is "no room for the death 
penalty in the 21st century", quoted by news.bg. Some of the 170 countries have 
abolished it or ceased to practice it last month. 2 African States. Gambia and 
Madagascar - have taken important steps to end the death penalty, - said the UN 
chief.


In 2016, the number of convicted persons decreased by 37% compared to the 
previous year.


The UN also believes that there are a large number of executions in China, but 
there is "no accurate data" on this issue.


It should not be forgotten that several states in the United States still have 
the heaviest punishment.


(source: novinite.com)








Pope Francis: The death penalty is contrary to the Gospel



Pope Francis declared Wednesday that the death penalty is "contrary to the 
Gospel." He said that "however grave the crime that may be committed, the death 
penalty is inadmissible because it attacks the inviolability and the dignity of 
the person."


He did so in a major talk on Oct. 11 to an audience of cardinals, bishops, 
priests, nuns, catechists, and ambassadors from many countries on the 25th 
anniversary of the promulgation of the catechism, affirming that there has been 
a development of doctrine in the church and a change in the consciousness of 
the Christian people on the question of the death penalty. The pope's comments 
and the timing of them suggest that a revision of the Catechism of the Catholic 
Church may be forthcoming to reflect this new development in the church's 
understanding.


"One has to strongly affirm that condemnation to the death penalty is an 
inhuman measure that humiliates personal dignity, in whatever form it is 
carried out. And [it] is, of itself, contrary to the Gospel, because it is 
freely decided to suppress a human life that is always sacred in the eyes of 
the Creator, and of which, in the final analysis, God alone is the true judge 
and guarantor," Pope Francis said.


"One has to strongly affirm that condemnation to the death penalty is an 
inhuman measure that humiliates personal dignity, in whatever form it is 
carried out."


Reiterating an observation in his Letter to the President of the International 
Commission against the Death Penalty, March 20, 2015, Francis said that "No man 
ever, not even the murderer, loses his personal dignity, because God is a 
Father who always awaits the return of the son who, knowing that he has done 
wrong, asks pardon and begins a new life." For this reason, he said, "life 
cannot be taken away from anyone" and there must always be "the possibility of 
a moral and existential redemption that will be to the favor of the community."


His statement is sure to be welcomed by bishops' conferences and the 
overwhelming majority of the Christian faithful around the world, many of whom 
have long called for the church to take this stance. His predecessors have been 
slowly moving towards the position taken today by Francis. Every pope since St. 
John XXIII has appealed to governments worldwide on behalf of persons condemned 
to death, asking for clemency.


When St. John Paul II published the catechism in 1992 it still admitted the use 
of the death penalty (No. 2266). But strong reaction from bishops and the 
faithful in many countries led him to revise the text in 1997, with the help of 
then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. The revised text (No. 2267), however, still did 
not exclude the death penalty on moral grounds as Pope Francis did today; it 
said that given the possibilities the modern state has of rendering the 
criminal incapable of doing harm again, then "the cases in which the execution 
of the offender is an absolute necessity 'are very rare, if not practically 
non-existent.'"


When St. John Paul II published the catechism in 1992 it still admitted the use 
of the death penalty.


Several times since becoming pope, Francis has made clear his total opposition 
to the death penalty, including in his speech to the U.S. Congress and to the 
United Nations in September 2015. But today he took a much greater step than 
any of his predecessors by declaring publicly on a solemn occasion, directly 
related to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, that the death penalty is 
"contrary to the Gospel" and "inadmissible," making clear that the catechism 
must address the question in this more complete way.


The Jesuit pope began his talk by recalling that at the opening of the Second 
Vatican Council on Oct. 11, 1962, John XXIII said, "It is necessary first of 
all that the church should never depart from the sacred 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, FLA., LA., OHIO, IND., ARK., USA

2017-10-12 Thread Rick Halperin





Oct. 13



TEXASimpending executions

Man convicted in Texas prison guard's death to be executed



A Texas death row inmate who sued unsuccessfully to try to halt his execution, 
arguing that more DNA testing needed to be done, is now trying to convince the 
U.S. Supreme Court to stop the punishment scheduled for Thursday.


Robert Pruett was already serving 99 years for a neighbor's killing when he was 
convicted in the death of a prison guard who was stabbed in an attack that 
prosecutors say stemmed from a dispute over a peanut butter sandwich. Pruett 
wanted to take the sandwich into a recreation yard against prison rules, they 
said. An autopsy showed corrections officer Daniel Nagle died of a heart attack 
brought on by the December 1999 stabbing.


Pruett, 38, has insisted he's innocent of Nagle's death at the McConnell Unit 
near Beeville, about 85 miles (136 kilometers) southeast of San Antonio. He 
would become the 6th prisoner executed this year in Texas, which carries out 
the death penalty more than any other states. Texas executed a total of seven 
inmates last year.


Pruett avoided execution in April 2015 when a state judge halted his punishment 
just hours before he could have been taken to the death chamber. His lawyers 
had convinced the judge that new DNA tests needed to be conducted on the 
tape-wrapped, 7-inch sharpened steel rod used to repeatedly stab the 
37-year-old Nagle. The new tests showed no DNA on the tape but uncovered DNA on 
the rod from an unknown female who authorities said likely handled the shank 
during the appeals process after the original tests in 2002. The execution was 
put on the schedule again.


After seeking even more DNA testing and being rejected by the courts, Pruett's 
attorneys filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in August in which they argued 
that the courts denied Pruett due process. The lawyers asked the federal courts 
to halt the rescheduled execution, allow the additional DNA testing and then 
check the results for matches in law enforcement databases.Last week, the 5th 
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the lawsuit. But Pruett's attorneys 
appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, arguing that a lower court judge 
wrongly rejected the case after sitting on it for 2 months.


In a second appeal to the Supreme Court, also filed on Tuesday, the attorneys 
asked the high court to revisit the question of whether it is constitutional to 
execute a prisoner who claims actual innocence because of newly discovered 
evidence. U.S. Supreme Court justices in 1993 ruled 6-3 in a Texas case that it 
was constitutional to do so.


State attorneys say Pruett's lawyers have long engaged in "a pattern of delay."

No physical evidence tied Pruett to Nagle's death. At his 2002 trial, prisoners 
testified that they saw Pruett attack Nagle or heard him talk about wanting to 
kill the guard. According to some of the testimony, he talked about possessing 
a weapon as well.


Pruett has said he was framed and that Nagle, an officer for more than 3 years, 
could have been killed by other inmates or corrupt officers at the McConnell 
Unit.


"I never killed nobody in my life," Pruett testified at his trial. He said he 
was in a gym when he learned the officer had been stabbed.


Pruett's 99-year murder sentence that he was already serving was for 
participating at age 15 with his father and a brother in the 1995 stabbing 
death of a 29-year-old neighbor, Raymond Yarbrough, at the man's trailer home 
in Channelview, just east of Houston. Pruett's father, 70-year-old Howard 
Pruett, is serving life in prison. His brother, 47-year-old Howard Pruett Jr., 
was sentenced to 40 years.


(source: Associated Press)

*

Houston serial killer loses appeal 1 week before scheduled execution



With just a week to go before his scheduled execution, Houston serial killer 
Anthony Shore lost a last-ditch appeal claiming decades-old unrealized brain 
damage left him so impaired he was not morally culpable for his crimes.


The so-called Tourniquet Killer slated for execution Wednesday was convicted of 
capital murder in 2004 after he confessed to brutally slaying 4 young women in 
the Houston area.


In the latest appeal, turned down by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on 
Tuesday, Shore's lawyers argued that the extent of his brain damage rendered 
the execution unconstitutional, likening it to executing an intellectually 
disabled prisoner.


"Mr. Shore does not claim he is ineligible for the death penalty because he is 
unintelligent or uncharismatic," his lawyers wrote earlier this month in a 
court filing.


"Mr. Shore is ineligible for the death penalty because his brain injury 
decreases his moral culpability for his crimes, in the same way that a 
juvenile, despite intelligence or charisma, is nonetheless ineligible for the 
death penalty."


But the state's highest criminal court didn't buy into that argument.

"We find that applicant has