Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (voice)
217-244-1478 (fax)
fbo...@law.uiuc.edu <mailto:fbo...@law.uiuc.edu> 
(personal comments only)
 
-----Original Message-----
From: thenobelpeaceprizetor...@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:thenobelpeaceprizetor...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Boyle,
Francis
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 2:47 PM
To: 'thenobelpeaceprizetor...@yahoogroups.com'
Cc: nppr...@compar.com
Subject: [thenobelpeaceprizetoryan] Ryan Nominated for 2006!


ok. i just nominated George Ryan for the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize. I faxed the
papers through and have a confirmed receipt. The original documents will
follow by Federal Express to them. we can put out a press release too if you
all want to along the lines of the one already put out. of course i cannot
disclose the formal nomination papers themselves since they must remain
confidential. i also called Ryan and thanked him for all his fine work
against the death penalty and he extended his thanks to all of us for
supporting him at this difficult time in his life. we had 4 lawyers draft
the nomination papers: Jerry Boyle, Karen Conti, Greg Adamski and me. fab.
 
Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.
Champaign, IL 61820 USA
217-333-7954 (voice)
217-244-1478 (fax)
fbo...@law.uiuc.edu <mailto:fbo...@law.uiuc.edu> 
(personal comments only)
 
 

  _____  

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 


        
*        Visit your group "thenobelpeaceprizetoryan
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thenobelpeaceprizetoryan> " on the web.
  

*        To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 thenobelpeaceprizetoryan-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:thenobelpeaceprizetoryan-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com?subject=unsubsc
ribe> 
  

*        Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 


  _____  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/private/deathpenalty/attachments/20051021/b0e27a3a/attachment.htm
From rhalp...@mail.smu.edu  Fri Oct 21 18:21:30 2005
From: rhalp...@mail.smu.edu (Rick Halperin)
Date: Fri Oct 21 17:16:29 2005
Subject: [Deathpenalty]death penalty news---TEXAS, IOWA, VA., USA 
Message-ID: <pine.wnt.4.44.0510211721210.2340-100...@its08705.smu.edu>






Oct. 21


TEXAS:

Woman Charged with 1st Degree Murder for Shaking Her Baby

In Carter County, a woman accused of shaking her 3-month-old baby to death
appeared before a judge this afternoon. KTENs Jocelyn Lockwood has the
story.

Authorities say 20-year-old Laura Renteria admitted to shaking her baby
for about a minute.

She was being held for unreasonable force against a child, but today the
District Attorneys office upped those charges.

Sometime over the weekend, Renteria brought her baby to Mercy Memorial
hospital.

The baby was injured so badly it was later flown to OU Medical Center
where it died.

Now, the District Attorneys office has upped her charge to 1st-degree
murder.

Laura Renteria told authorities she was frustrated with the child, and
that she couldnt make it stop crying.

At 1:30 today, she appeared before a Carter County judge, via video
monitor, where she learned she is now being charged with the murder of her
baby.

"Well, anytime a child dies it is a difficult case, we see a lot of things
up here, but certainly thats at the top as far as the most difficult cases
to deal with emotionally, but nevertheless thats what we do," said Craig
Ladd, Assistant District Attorney. "That's our job, it is to file charges
based on what the evidence indicates."

Renteria is being held in the Carter County jail on a 1-million dollar
bond.

Today, the judge set her hearing date for December 20th.

First-degree murder charges mean Renteria could face life in prison, life
in prison without parole, or the death penalty.

(source: KTEN News)

********************

Families of the Executed to Gather for the First Time


Survivors of people who were executed by the state will gather for the
first time for a day of support, organizing, and the public launch of a
project they are calling "No Silence, No Shame: families of the executed
speak out against the death penalty."

More than 20 survivors will come together in Austin, Texas on Thursday,
Oct. 27 for the event, which is being held in conjunction with the annual
conference of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. The day
of organizing will feature a 4 p.m. public ceremony, which will take place
at the Hyatt Regency on Town Lake. "Families of the executed are the death
penalty's invisible victims," said Renny Cushing, Executive Director of
Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights (MVFHR). MVFHR, a non-profit
organization of families of victims of murder and state execution who work
against the death penalty, initiated the "No Silence, No Shame" project in
order to draw attention to the effects of the death penalty on the
relatives of the condemned. "As a victims' anti-death penalty
organization, we challenge the notion that all victims want and need the
death penalty in order to heal," Cushing said. "Our organization includes
people who have lost a family member to murder and people who have lost a
family member to execution. We know the 2 groups must stand together. With
this project, we are bringing family members of the executed together to
support each other and strengthen their voices of opposition to the death
penalty."

Family members of people who were executed are traveling to the gathering
from Virginia, Tennessee, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Georgia,
and Massachusetts. They will be joined by several family members of
persons executed in Texas, a state that leads the nation in executions per
year, having carried out 14 of the 42 executions in the United States so
far in 2005 - more than any other state.

The project's chief message is that the public needs to be made aware of
the effect of executions on surviving family members. "You hear about the
death penalty on the news, but you really don?t think about it until it
affects you," said Billie Jean Mayberry, whose brother Robert Coe was
executed in Tennessee in 2000. "I don't think people understand what
executions do to the families of the person being executed. To us, our
brother was murdered right in front of our eyes. It changed all of our
lives." By telling their personal stories, the survivors also draw
attention to some of the controversial issues inherent in the death
penalty debate - like whether it should be deemed unconstitutional to
execute persons suffering from mental illness.

"Our son Larry was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic at the age of
21," said Lois Robison of Burleson. The Robisons tried desperately for
years to get proper treatment for their son, only to be told, after each
hospital discharge, that although he would likely get worse without
further care, he was not violent and so was not eligible for long-term
treatment.

"Our son's first and only act of violence was to kill five people," Lois
Robison said. Larry Robison was sentenced to death and executed in 2000.
"How can a modern, civilized society choose to exterminate its ill
citizens rather than treat them?" his mother wonders.

One of the participants in the "No Silence, No Shame" gathering is Robert
Meeropol. Meeropol is the Executive Director of the Rosenberg Fund for
Children, a foundation he started as a legacy to his parents, Julius and
Ethel Rosenberg. In 1953, when Robert was six years old, his parents were
executed by the United States government for "conspiring to steal the
secret of the atomic bomb." Though the Rosenbergs' controversial case
attracted considerable attention, Meeropol points out that the effect of
executions on surviving children has been largely ignored.

"As far as I know no one has studied how the execution of an immediate
family member impacts children," Meeropol said. "We don't even know how
many children have an immediate family member on death row in the United
States today. Worse, we don't know the effect that having a parent
executed will have upon their impressionable lives, and the cost society
may pay for that impact."

For the families involved in the "No Silence, No Shame" project, the
gathering in Austin is just the beginning. The project plans to develop a
network of families of the executed around the country, publish materials
that educate policymakers about the effect of the death penalty on
surviving families, and work with child welfare and mental health
professionals to publicize the short- and long-term social costs of
executions.

(source: NCADP)






IOWA:

Republicans say they'll bring up death penalty again in
January----Democrats call it politics


Key Republicans say they'll again push for a vote on the death penalty
during the next session of the Iowa Legislature, which begins in January.
At least two members of a legislative committee plan to bring the issue up
at their meeting next Wednesday.

The state outlawed capital punishment in 1965, but Senator Jeff Angelo, a
Republican from Creston, says recent crimes against children have Iowans
rethinking that. "There are a lot of folks (who) say to us, you know,
given the monstrosity of the some of the crimes that we're seeing, they
believe that (the death penalty) may be justifiable," Angelo says. "I
think it's even given death penalty opponents some pause when you think
about some of the crime that we've seen."

This past spring after the kidnapping, rape and murder of nine-year-old
Jetseta Gage of Cedar Rapids -- allegedly at the hands of a convicted sex
offender -- a few Republicans in the Senate proposed a limited death
penalty that would apply in such child murder cases, but the Senate
Democratic Leader refused to allow a vote on the proposal.

The 50-member Iowa Senate's split evenly between Republicans and
Democrats, so Republicans like Angelo would need to change the mind of
that Democrat Leader to get a death penalty bill passed in the Senate. "I
think that there are enough conservative Democrats to get us to 26 (votes
to pass the bill)," Angelo says. "I would like to see the political
pressure build to bring (the death penalty bill) to a vote."

But Senate Democratic Leader Michael Gronstal of Council Bluffs says he
will continue to block a vote on the death penalty. Gronstal says
Republicans are "disingenuous" because Republicans held control of the
Iowa Senate for eight years, and never passed the death penalty when they
had a Republican Governor -- Terry Branstad -- who would have signed it
into law. Current Governor Tom Vilsack, a Democrat, would veto any death
penalty bill that reaches his desk. "They're shifting into full political
mode," Gronstal says. "The only time Republicans really care about the
political death penalty is...in election years." Gronstal accuses
Republicans of "using" a tragedy for political gain. "I think that's the
worst kind of politics," Gronstal says. "Taking an incredible tragedy like
this and just playing politics with it when they know full well it won't
pass the House, the Senate, or the governor won't sign it."

Republicans, though, intend to campaign against Democrats who have opposed
the death penalty as they believe a majority of Iowans support it. The
trial of the man accused of sexually molesting Jetseta Gage is scheduled
to start in January, and Roger Bentley, that man's brother, is the one
accused of kidnapping, raping and killing the girl after his brother was
accused of molesting Jetseta.

(source: RadioIowa)






VIRGINIA:

Why Many Eyes Are on the Virginia Race


This year's contest for governor of Virginia is being viewed as almost
everything except a contest for governor of Virginia.

It's said to be a test of the political impact of President Bush's growing
unpopularity, of the wide popularity of incumbent Democratic Gov. Mark
Warner and of the political skills of George Allen, the state's ambitious
Republican junior senator.

Well, yes, the Bush factor will be much studied, and it will be worth
noticing if Warner helps elect Tim Kaine, the state's Democratic
lieutenant governor, or if Allen gets Republican Jerry Kilgore, the former
attorney general, across the finish line.

But the election is between Kaine and Kilgore, and the most important
national implications of November's voting will grow from issues -- in
particular, the death penalty and sprawl -- that the 2 men are raising
themselves.

If Kilgore wins on the basis of a truly scandalous series of
advertisements about the death penalty, it will encourage Republicans all
over the country to pull a stained and tattered battle flag out of the
closet.

Kaine is a Roman Catholic who opposes the death penalty. "My faith teaches
life is sacred," he says. "I personally oppose the death penalty." I cheer
Kaine for being one of the few politicians with the guts to say this the
way he does. It's disturbing that faith-based political stands that don't
point in a conservative direction rarely inspire the church-based
political activism that, say, abortion, arouses. Maybe some of the
churches will examine their consciences.

But Virginia has a death penalty on the books, so Kaine says plainly: "I
take my oath of office seriously, and I'll enforce the death penalty."

That's not good enough for Kilgore. You have to read much of the ad he ran
on this issue to believe it. In the commercial, Stanley Rosenbluth, whose
son Richard and daughter-in-law Becky were murdered, declares:

"Mark Sheppard shot Richard twice and went over and shot Becky 2 more
times. Tim Kaine voluntarily represented the person who murdered my son.
He stood with murderers in trying to get them off death row. No matter how
heinous the crime, he doesn't believe that death is a punishment. Tim
Kaine says that Adolf Hitler doesn't qualify for the death penalty. This
was the worst mass murderer in modern times. . . . I don't trust Tim Kaine
when it comes to the death penalty, and I say that as a father who's had a
son murdered."

Rosenbluth has every right to his rage, and all of us empathize with his
loss. What can't be justified is the exploitation of someone else's
emotion for the crassest of political purposes, or the underlying message
of the ad.

Representing death row inmates is unpopular but essential because it
allows the justice system to work -- and that includes finding guilty
people guilty. Challenging prosecutors to make sure the wrong people
aren't executed can actually be a service to crime victims. No one wants
an innocent person put to death so the guilty party can remain at large to
kill again.

Then there was that astounding Hitler reference. What does Hitler, who is
thoroughly dead, have to do with the future of Virginia? When a reporter
for the Richmond Times-Dispatch asked Kaine about the death penalty and
Hitler, Kaine struggled with what is the hardest case of all for capital
punishment's opponents. "God grants life, and God should take it away,"
Kaine said as part of a lengthy and somewhat indeterminate answer. "[Do]
horrible, heinous things deserve incredible punishment? You bet."

Kaine was conflicted over this difficult hypothetical, and why not? I
respect him for not giving the easy, political answer -- which, I confess,
I would have been tempted to give: make an exception for Hitler, put him
to death, next question.

Kilgore, under fire for the ridiculous death penalty ads, moved on this
week to other issues. So did Kaine. He is trying to win over previously
Republican voters in Northern Virginia's rapidly growing Prince William
and Loudoun counties by offering localities more tools to regulate
development.

"We can't just tax and pave our way out of traffic," Kaine says. "I'll
give your community more power to stop out-of-control development that
increases traffic." Note the conservative side of the anti-sprawl message:
Kaine is talking about the limits of taxing and spending, and about the
importance of local control. Sprawl is one of those issues with the
potential to scramble existing political alliances.

So, yes, the Virginia governor's race has national implications. It is a
contest between backward-looking wedge politics and forward-looking
problem solving. My hunch is that Virginia's voters know this.

(source: Washington Post)






USA:

Despite Opposition, Lawmakers Push Limits to Defendants Rights


After temporarily shelving a measure that would severely restrict the
rights of criminal defendants to challenge state convictions in the
federal court system and restrain federal judges from reviewing
death-penalty convictions, the Senate is set to consider an alternate bill
with many of the same provisions. The federal judiciarys policy-making
body opposes the efforts.

Last week, the Senate decided to delay a vote on The Streamlined
Procedures Act (SPA) of 2005 after receiving two separate letters from the
Judicial Conference cautioning that the act would interfere with federal
courts ability to review all manner of capital convictions in state
courts, The National Law Journal reported yesterday. Some Democratic
Senators had raised objections to the act as well.

Introduced by Senator Jon Kyl (R-Arizona), SPA would place barriers on
defendants seeking federal review of their convictions under habeas
corpus, a centuries-old legal maneuver providing the only means by which a
person can bring a state conviction to the federal judiciary short of
going to the Supreme Court. Additionally, the SPA would bar federal courts
from opening examinations into many, if not most, state death-penalty
convictions, according to the Congressional Research Service.

Supporters of the SPA say the law is the only means to unclog what they
see as a backlog of cases awaiting federal review. Opponents warn that
passage of the bill represents a drastic departure from long-standing
practices in the nations court system.

Official court records show that the number of habeas cases resolved each
year is nearly the same as the number filed, The National Law Journal
reported, indicating that no such backlog exists.

Instead of acting on the SPA, the Senate is preparing to hold hearings on
an amended version offered by Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania). The Specter
measure lessens restrictions on federal oversight but holds onto rules
requiring a convict seeking federal review to demonstrate innocence before
a federal court may intervene, The National Law Journal said.

Senate hearings on Specters bill are schedule for October 26.

(source: The NewStandard)






Reply via email to