[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, FLA., ALA., CALIF.

2012-10-18 Thread Rick Halperin




Oct. 18


TEXASimpending execution

Texas to execute man who killed police officer in 1998


A man who shot to death a Houston police officer in 1998 is scheduled to be 
executed by lethal injection on Thursday in Texas.


Anthony Haynes, 33, would be the 11th inmate executed this year in Texas and 
the 33rd in the United States, according to the Death Penalty Information 
Center. The execution is scheduled for after 6 p.m. (2300 GMT) in Huntsville.


Haynes fired a shot from his truck at a Jeep Cherokee carrying off-duty Houston 
police officer Kent Kincaid and his wife, Nancy, according to an account of the 
case from the Texas attorney general's office.


The officer got out of his Jeep and approached Haynes' truck, telling him that 
he was a police officer and asking to see his driver's license, the account 
said.


Nancy Kincaid said during Haynes' trial that her husband was reaching for his 
badge when the driver shot him in the head, according to a Houston Chronicle 
account at the time.


(The driver) pulled his hand up and I saw the flash and I heard the pop, 
Nancy Kincaid testified. That was the end. He then went down.


Kent Kincaid was declared brain-dead at the hospital.

That same night, Haynes had committed several armed robberies, Texas officials 
say.


I'm not a vicious psychopath who goes around wanting to take people's lives, 
Haynes told the Houston Chronicle in a 2001 death row interview. There was no 
intent to kill a cop. He did not ID himself until a second before I shot him.


Haynes has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, raising questions about whether 
his trial lawyers were effective.


(source: Reuters)

***

2 More in Line for Death Penalty; These 2 men were both 19 when they were 
sentenced to death



Anthony Cardell Haynes

Anthony Haynes claimed he didn't know that Kent Kincaid was a Houston police 
sergeant when he shot him in the head back in 1998. Kincaid was off-duty and 
driving his personal vehicle when Haynes drove by; something cracked Kincaid's 
windshield, and he reportedly thought Haynes had thrown something at him. He 
followed Haynes, and when the 19-year-old stopped his car, Kincaid approached 
him. Kincaid said he was a police officer, but Haynes later said he didn't know 
whether to believe him. When Kincaid reached behind his back, presumably for a 
badge, Haynes pulled out a .25-caliber gun and shot him. Anthony HaynesHaynes 
blamed the tragedy in part on drugs and falling in with a bad crowd of people 
who reportedly made a game out of shooting at the windshields of passing cars 
and then robbing the drivers after they stopped. As it happened, the crack in 
Kincaid's windshield was made by a bullet. Jurors in Haynes' case deliberated 
for three days before sentencing the teen to death.


That sentence was overturned, however, after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of 
Appeals agreed with Haynes' defense that an unusual jury-selection setup in 
Haynes' case had denied his right to equal protection under law. Indeed, 2 
different judges presided over Haynes' jury selection; one heard prosecutors 
interview individual jurors, and a second heard the lawyers' arguments for 
striking from service the potential jurors. As it turned out, the state used 
its power to strike all but one of the black potential jurors, arguing that it 
was not their race that excluded them (which would be illegal), but their 
demeanor. But Haynes' appeal attorney argued that the judge who allowed those 
strikes had not actually witnessed the jurors' questioning and thus could not 
actually have seen whether their demeanor would be a basis on which to have 
them struck. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately disagreed with the 5th Circuit, 
ruling that there was no rule that would require a judge to personally 
observe the juror questioning when deciding whether a juror is lawfully struck 
from service.


Haynes is scheduled for execution today, Oct. 18.

Bobby Lee Hines

Bobby Lee Hines was also just 19 when he was sentenced to death for the robbery 
and strangling of 26-year-old Michelle Haupt in her Dallas apartment. Now, 20 
years later, he's scheduled to die for that crime on Oct. 24. But his attorney, 
Lydia Brandt, argues that Hines' execution should, once again, be stayed while 
the courts consider whether his lawyers have done enough to save his life.


Hines was convicted of the 1991 murder of Haupt, who was stabbed repeatedly 
with an ice pick and strangled with a cord inside her apartment. Hines had been 
staying next door with the apartment complex's maintenance man. Police found 
items from Haupt's apartment, including packs of cigarettes and a bowl of 
pennies, under a couch where Hines had been sleeping.


Hines' 1st date with death was stayed in 2003, while the courts considered a 
claim that he was mentally retarded and thus ineligible for execution. Although 
Hines had a diagnosed learning disability and was considered emotionally 
disturbed, the 

[Deathpenalty]death penalty news----TEXAS, FLA., ALA., CALIF.

2006-01-26 Thread Rick Halperin





Jan. 26


TEXAS:

Death row man carried to his execution


A man who murdered four people in a Texas drug dealer rip-off was carried
to his execution today when he refused to leave a Texas jail's death house
cell voluntarily.

Asked by a warden if he had any final statement, Marion Dudley did not
respond.

Dudley, 33, of Tuscaloosa, Alabama, had earlier said he wasn't at the
house on June 20, 1992, where six people were bound and then shot, 4 of
them fatally, in what authorities said was a drug dealer rip-off.

He kept his eyes closed and never turned his head toward witnesses in the
chamber, which included 1 of the survivors of the shooting and relatives
of one of the people killed.

8 minutes later at 6.16pm CST (11.16 AEDT Thursday), he was pronounced
dead.

Prison officials in Huntsville, Texas, said Dudley was not combative, but
that he wouldn't walk to the execution on his own.

Dudley, who had a record in his home state for burglary, assault,
receiving stolen property and violating probation, was the 1st Texas
inmate put to death this year.

19 convicted killers were executed in 2005 as Texas maintained its
notoriety as the nation's most active capital punishment state.

Another murderer is set for lethal injection next week and 3 more in
February.

They are among more than a dozen Texas prisoners with execution dates in
the first 5 months of this year.

Dudley's lawyer had hoped the US Supreme Court would stop his punishment,
arguing prosecutors improperly withheld from defence lawyers at his
capital murder trial a letter to Alabama parole officials regarding an
inmate from that state who testified against Dudley. But the high court
rejected the appeal a few hours before the execution.

The 2 survivors identified the then 20-year-old Dudley as one of the three
gunmen who barged into the home of Jose Tovar, 32, and his wife, Rachel,
then 33.

In a recent interview on death row, Dudley said they were wrong.

I was not, he said.

Jose Tovar was fatally shot in the head, as were his wife's son, Frank
Farias, 17; Farias' girlfriend, Jessica Quinones, 19, who was 7 months
pregnant; and a visiting neighbour Audrey Brown, 21. Rachel Tovar and
another friend, Nicholas Cortez, then 22, survived.

All the victims were bound with towels or strips of sheets, hands tied
behind their backs and nooses around their necks. Rachel Tovar managed to
crawl to a neighbour's house for help.

After watching Dudley die, Tovar, 48, said she can be at peace, knowing
that I represent my family, my children, my husband.

There's a little relief in me, she said, tears running down her face.

But, I lived this going on 14 years and there's not ever going to be
something to help me forget it. It's never going to go away.

Maricella Quinones, whose sister died in the gunfire, said the execution
didn't match her sister's suffering.

(source: Associated Press)






FLORIDA:

High Court to Hear Lethal-Injection Case


The Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide when death row inmates may
challenge lethal injection as a method of capital punishment, in a
surprise decision issued after the justices dramatically stopped the
execution of a Florida prisoner who was already strapped to a gurney
preparing to die.

Clarence E. Hill, 48, convicted of murdering a Pensacola police officer in
1982, had refused a final meal and needles had punctured his arm when the
Supreme Court stayed his execution. The court said it would hear his claim
that he should have an opportunity to argue that his civil rights would be
violated because the chemicals used to execute him would cause excessive
pain.

It is a claim that has been pressed with growing frequency by capital
defense lawyers around the country in recent years -- but that has
generally not yet succeeded, either in lower courts or at the Supreme
Court.

37 of the 38 death penalty states use lethal injection, as do the U.S.
military and the federal government. Since the chemical mixtures in all
jurisdictions are similar to those used in Florida, a victory for Hill at
the Supreme Court could tie up the death penalty across the county in
litigation, at least temporarily, legal analysts said.

It certainly could be a mess, said Douglas A. Berman, a professor at
Ohio State University who specializes in criminal law. According to the
Death Penalty Information Center, an anti-death-penalty organization, at
least 25 inmates are scheduled for execution between now and the end of
June, when the court would probably issue a decision.

The Hill case does not ask the court to rule directly on the
constitutionality of lethal injection -- which states adopted as an
alternative to hanging, gas, electrocution and shooting -- even though
Hill maintains that the particular mix of chemicals used in Florida would
cause him an unconstitutional degree of suffering.

Rather, the case raises a procedural problem: what recourse there should
be for a prisoner who finds out at or near the last minute that the method

[Deathpenalty]death penalty news-----TEXAS, FLA., ALA., CALIF.

2005-12-30 Thread Rick Halperin





Dec. 30


TEXAS:

DA Maness questions capital case


Jefferson County's district attorney Thursday questioned the fairness of a
recent federal appeals court's rejection of a request to remove a Beaumont
man from death row because he is mentally retarded.

District Attorney Tom Maness said he believed capital murderer Marvin Lee
Wilson was not mentally retarded and deserved the death penalty, which he
received in 1994 for abducting and killing a narcotics informant two years
earlier.

However, Maness questioned whether justice was served when the U.S. Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals last week rejected Wilson's case because his
lawyers missed the filing deadline.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 outlawed the death penalty for mentally
handicapped criminals with an IQ below 70. Wilson's attorneys in their
appeal contend that their client's IQ is 61.

However, the appeal to have the sentence commuted to life without parole
missed the filing deadline by more than 40 days, the appeals court said in
its ruling.

Wilson, 47, was sentenced to death in 1994 for the abduction and shooting
death of Jerry Robert Williams, a 21-year-old Beaumont resident.

However, in 1996, the Texas Court of Criminal appeals overturned the
conviction and ordered a new trial after determining that prosecutors had
improperly attacked Wilson's attorneys.

In March 1998, a second jury sentenced Wilson to death.

Following the 2002 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, lawyers for death row
clients had a year to file an appeal with a case based on mental
retardation.

According to the Fifth Circuit court ruling, Wilson's lawyers filed his
case on the last day, in both state and federal appeals courts.

However, the Fifth Circuit court soon dismissed the case, saying that
state-court remedies had not been exhausted.

On Nov. 10, 2004, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied Wilson's
appeal.

Wilson's lawyers then had one business day to file with the federal
appeals court.

The appeal was filed, but the case did not meet filing requirements laid
out under federal law.

Wilson's attorneys did not properly refile the case until 40 days later,
according to last week's Fifth Circuit ruling.

Maness, whose office won the death penalty in 1994 and 1998 against
Wilson, said he didn't feel Wilson should be punished for his lawyers'
errors.

James Delee, one of Wilson's attorneys in the appeals case, did not return
3 calls for comment Thursday.

Maness said that while it is important to have an efficient justice
system, the rules should be flexible when it comes to life-or-death cases.

Fifth Circuit judges in their ruling accused Wilson's lawyers of playing a
game of brinkmanship, pushing a situation to the limit to gain some kind
of advantage or concession.

However, Maness said that should not prevent Wilson from getting fair
treatment.

I'm not opposed to bending the rules in this situation, Maness said. I
hate to see this harsh result because lawyers were playing games.

Everyone who goes through the system deserves a fair shake. Our job as
prosecutor is to be advocates and seek justice (for victims), but also we
must see justice is done (to defendants.).

According to previous Enterprise stories, Wilson and another man shot
Williams, a police drug informant, to death and left his nude body lying
near the curb at Verone and Buford streets, where a bus driver found him
early Nov. 10, 1992.

About a week before that, Williams had provided police with a tip leading
to a drug bust at Wilson's house.

Wilson, who had been heard saying he was going to get Williams, left his
stripped body in the street as a message to other snitches, prosecutors
said.

In a letter posted on the Web site www.deathrow-usa.com seeking pen pals,
Wilson downplayed his criminal history and denied having anything to do
with Williams' death.

He attributed his criminal history to an inability to find legal work.

I enjoy reading, working out, trying to learn how to draw, playing chess,
and I love writing letters, but they are not able to exchange as many
letters as I need to keep me comfortably occupied, so I'm pretty lonely
these days, Wilson said.

(source: The Beaumont Enterprise)

**

Disciplinary letters detail mistakes made before inmate's escape --
Enough collective responsibility to go around


We are learning more about the mistakes made by Harris County Sheriff's
deputies that lead to last month's escape of death row inmate Charles
Thompson. Those revelations are being found through disciplinary letters
written to several deputies.

That escape cost one deputy his job and several others time off work.
After reviewing these documents, we're learning what the sheriff's office
says helped a convicted killer walk free.

Inmate Charles Thompson recalled, It was real relaxed. They play
videogames. They sleep on the job.

Thompson spoke from his prison cell about how easy it was to escape the
Harris county jail. After that interview, new documents are now