Re: [Debconf-discuss] [Debconf-team] Thanking our sponsors

2010-05-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:00:16AM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:

Hi Micah,

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:31:40PM -0400, micah anderson wrote:
My guess is the great DrDub, who has been doing an amazingly 
significant amount of work in discussing with sponsors and potential 
sponsors has discussed with them the relative merits of donating, and 
perhaps the perk of the logo on the shirt is part of that sell.


It would be interesting to know if he has heard one way or the other 
From the sponsors, if cared about that or not. I'm certainly no 
monetary sponsor, and probably should not use myself as a model, but 
if I were, I would be sponsoring Debconf because my company benefits 
significantly From Debian as a distribution. Either because it is a 
core business, or makes up critical internal infrastructure. The 
existence of a logo, or not, would not matter to me because I saved 
10 gazillion dollars because we switched to Debian, and I want to 
keep that savings around.


I can assure you that, while you accurately describe the motivations 
and desires of some of our sponsors, other actual and potential 
sponsors do care about seeing their logo displayed on the shirts and in 
other cases. For them it's about getting publicity for their 
organization to an audience that might care about them, instead of 
giving back to Debian per se. Both types are useful sources of funding.


How about then explicitly selling that advertising space?

If only some of the sponsors are (highly) interested in their logo 
promoted on that t-shirt, then leaving out those who don't will make the 
logos of the others bigger :-)


...and we won't hide that this is what it is: a billboard for sale!

I believe we already at other places document who are big and who are 
small sponsors, so I guess we need not have the t-shirt be 
representative of that.



Just sharing an idea here.  I am not grumpy about the status quo, and 
highly appreciate the great work of the organisers!!



Kind regards, and looking forward to see you all soon,

 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss


Re: [Debconf-discuss] [Debconf-team] Thanking our sponsors

2010-05-26 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

On Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 How about then explicitly selling that advertising space?

We do that already, don't we?


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss


Re: [Debconf-discuss] [Debconf-team] Thanking our sponsors

2010-05-25 Thread micah anderson
On Tue, 25 May 2010 10:57:29 -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com 
wrote:
 On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:37:55PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
  On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Pablo Duboue pablo.dub...@gmail.com 
  wrote:
  
   A long while somebody in #debconf-team asked if we can have plain
   t-shirts available for sale without sponsor logos.
  
  I share that wish.
  
   That is of course a valid question and I would like to share my
   feelings about it: it would be a very bad idea ;-)
  
  snip excellent analysis
  
  I'd like to reiterate a downside to the sponsor logos mentioned by Clint:
  
  http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20100521.021314.53087a99.en.html
 
 But, how many of the existing sponsors who have contributed find value
 in having their logos displayed?

My guess is the great DrDub, who has been doing an amazingly significant
amount of work in discussing with sponsors and potential sponsors has
discussed with them the relative merits of donating, and perhaps the
perk of the logo on the shirt is part of that sell.

It would be interesting to know if he has heard one way or the other
From the sponsors, if cared about that or not. I'm certainly no monetary
sponsor, and probably should not use myself as a model, but if I were, I
would be sponsoring Debconf because my company benefits significantly
From Debian as a distribution. Either because it is a core business, or
makes up critical internal infrastructure. The existence of a logo, or
not, would not matter to me because I saved 10 gazillion dollars because
we switched to Debian, and I want to keep that savings around.

 -edrz (who never wears clothing with any visible printing in public ...
 I only wear my conference shirts when sleeping. That's irrelevant to
 this discussion because it doesn't matter to me whether the printing
 includes corporate logos or not. I just prefer to avoid being read or
 acting as a billboard for anyone or anything but myself. But, I'm most
 likely a very irrelevant corner case in that regard. I just
 parenthetically mention this to say that I am personally not invested in
 either side of the logo-ed vs logo-less DebConf shirt debate.)

I wouldn't put yourself so far in the corner. I feel similarly.

micah


pgpsYbYzbiTUd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss


Re: [Debconf-discuss] [Debconf-team] Thanking our sponsors

2010-05-25 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
Hi Micah,

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:31:40PM -0400, micah anderson wrote:
 My guess is the great DrDub, who has been doing an amazingly significant
 amount of work in discussing with sponsors and potential sponsors has
 discussed with them the relative merits of donating, and perhaps the
 perk of the logo on the shirt is part of that sell.
 
 It would be interesting to know if he has heard one way or the other
 From the sponsors, if cared about that or not. I'm certainly no monetary
 sponsor, and probably should not use myself as a model, but if I were, I
 would be sponsoring Debconf because my company benefits significantly
 From Debian as a distribution. Either because it is a core business, or
 makes up critical internal infrastructure. The existence of a logo, or
 not, would not matter to me because I saved 10 gazillion dollars because
 we switched to Debian, and I want to keep that savings around.

I can assure you that, while you accurately describe the motivations and
desires of some of our sponsors, other actual and potential sponsors do care
about seeing their logo displayed on the shirts and in other cases. For them
it's about getting publicity for their organization to an audience that might
care about them, instead of giving back to Debian per se. Both types are useful
sources of funding.

- Jimmy Kaplowitz
ji...@debian.org
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss