Another choice is Sam Chiu, mobile 0936-081430, email samchiu...@gmail.com
I got his taxi at a taxi stand last night and he came promptly today at the
time we agreed yesterday.
karen
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 03:23:24PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 07/29/2018 07:52 AM, John Sullivan wrote:
> > (trying to avoid direct use of Uber due to the proprietary software
> > required)
>
> You have more a problem with the fact that UBER uses proprietary software
> than the
On 07/31/2018 09:27 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:31:20PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> It's not incorrect, it's the ruling of the highest European court:
>
> I believe we are in Asia right now.
Yes, and even in Asia they have sane laws to protect workers
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 07:31:20PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> It's not incorrect, it's the ruling of the highest European court:
I believe we are in Asia right now.
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 07/30/2018 09:48 AM, Andrej Shadura wrote:
>> You have more a problem with the fact that UBER uses proprietary software
>> than the fact that they are exploiting their workers through by declaring
>> them as "contractors" through the help of loopholes in the law? [1, 2]
>
> That is incorrect,
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: English-speaking taxi number?"):
> Read paragraph 67 of the ET judgement if you want to see what the
> Tribunal thought of some of Uber's claims. I particularly like;
Oh, and para 87:
87 In the first place, we have been struck by the remarkable lengths
Andrej Shadura writes ("Re: English-speaking taxi number?"):
> Uber has many (and in the past had even more) different issues (e.g.
> company culture and their attitude towards certain issues), but fake
> contractorship is not one of them.
This is simply false, at leaast as
On 29 July 2018 at 15:23, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 07/29/2018 07:52 AM, John Sullivan wrote:
>> (trying to avoid direct use of Uber due to the proprietary software
>> required)
>
> You have more a problem with the fact that UBER uses proprietary software
> than the fact that they are
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dijo [Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 03:23:24PM +0200]:
> On 07/29/2018 07:52 AM, John Sullivan wrote:
> > (trying to avoid direct use of Uber due to the proprietary software
> > required)
>
> You have more a problem with the fact that UBER uses proprietary software
> than the
Bad translation...
Should be Mr. *Su* (蘇先生) instead.
(Forget that this should be a Mandarin name not Cantonese)
Henry Law
Sent from mobile
> On 29 Jul 2018, at 10:34 PM, Henry Law wrote:
>
> Asking help from my hotel’s reception and they give me this taxi driver’s
> number:
>
> Mr. So
>
林博仁 writes:
> I'm not a member of the local team though, just FYI while I edit the
> page for good.
For what it's worth, I had good success using Uber last night to get
to/from a restaurant in town.
Bdale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
First of all, sorry for the inconvenience. I've just called the
number on the page and confirmed that:
* The number on the page is indeed only in Mandarin, and
* They don't offer a number for English service, at least not in the
knowledge of the people who took the call.
I'm not a member of the
Last night I called the number on the wiki
(https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf18/Getting_Around) flagged as a
taxi service with English-speaking reception last night, but just got an
automated message/menu in Mandarin. Does anyone know another number or
what I might've done wrong? It also seems
13 matches
Mail list logo
