On 2016-01-24 17:23, martin f krafft wrote:
The wiki lists three purposes for this meeting:
1. Introductions from teams and their members.
2. Questions from teams about the process, and about what others
suggest they try to do on any uncertain aspects or potential
problems.
3. Questions to teams, if there are still unanswered issues.
Do we really need a meeting for any of these?
Ideally everything could be sorted out on the list (plus IRC), then only
one meeting would be required. But past experience suggests that some
bid teams and others, including even Committee members, do not become
fully engaged until the first meeting happens. Skipping the status
meeting then led to more meta-arguments (e.g. requests for delays while
additional information was sought) in the decision meeting.
For this year, the low number of questions/comments on the list (and
main IRC channels) so far doesn't fill me with confidence that everyone
has already fully engaged with the bid process.
Moray
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team