Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-09-07 Thread Kyle Robbertze
On 07/09/2017 10:20, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 08:36:18PM +0100, Andy Simpkins wrote: >> On 15/08/17 12:34, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> (3) Opsis still has a way to go but is already much better (and more stable) >> than the old TwinPacks > > Better? Sure. Stable? Not so

Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-09-07 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 08:36:18PM +0100, Andy Simpkins wrote: > On 15/08/17 12:34, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > (2) Voctomix appears to be stable - more flexibility with the picture in > picture would be nice but if I am saying that it is because everything else > is already good. OTOH, more

Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-09-07 Thread Kyle Robbertze
On 06/09/2017 21:36, Andy Simpkins wrote:> On 15/08/17 12:34, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> [...] > [...] > For my part I promise over the next few months to work on (pretty much > what I was supposed to do last year and didn't) > (A) Building Turbots into the Opsis box to provide Ethernet video out >

Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-09-06 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 15/08/17 12:34, Wouter Verhelst wrote: So, On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:18:55PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: As an aside to that, I think it also makes sense to do some internal evaluation. Did things work as expected? Do we need to fix things somewhere? What worked, what didn't work?

Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-08-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
So, On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:18:55PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > As an aside to that, I think it also makes sense to do some internal > evaluation. Did things work as expected? Do we need to fix things > somewhere? What worked, what didn't work? This. As for my bit, I think sreview

Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-08-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 02:42:57PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:15:29PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > This has now been scheduled for tomorrow at noon in the "potato" room. I > > was going to schedule it for today, but I came up fairly late with the > > idea and

Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-08-14 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:15:29PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > This has now been scheduled for tomorrow at noon in the "potato" room. I > was going to schedule it for today, but I came up fairly late with the > idea and didn't schedule it in time, so hence the move to tomorrow. sorry, I

Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-08-11 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:18:55PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi folks, > > It occurred to me that we've changed almost everything in our stack this > year: all of cameras, streaming software, review software, and if you > don't consider last year's "test" in menzies 12, director software as

Re: [Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-08-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:18:55PM -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi folks, > > It occurred to me that we've changed almost everything in our stack this > year: all of cameras, streaming software, review software, and if you > don't consider last year's "test" in menzies 12, director software as

[Debconf-video] Talk, and evaluation

2017-08-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi folks, It occurred to me that we've changed almost everything in our stack this year: all of cameras, streaming software, review software, and if you don't consider last year's "test" in menzies 12, director software as well have changed. As such, it might be a good idea to have a talk about