Hallo,
* Thorsten Glaser [Thu, Jul 23 2015, 11:38:41AM]:
First news regarding encfs: I had a look on it... and couldn't figure
out what's wrong with autoconf. I might dig further but it's waste of
time because upstream has already switched to Cmake in his master git
branch. I tried this quickly
Eduard Bloch dixit:
First news regarding encfs: I had a look on it... and couldn't figure
out what's wrong with autoconf. I might dig further but it's waste of
time because upstream has already switched to Cmake in his master git
branch. I tried this quickly and it compiles just fine on m68k.
Eduard Bloch dixit:
That's what an internet search gets you looking for m68k emulator.
Mh sure. There’s more than one though, and for Linux, you need an MMU.
Anyhow, I tried aranym with your image and instructions from
https://wiki.debian.org/Aranym/Quick#preview and had mixed feelings. See
Hm
Hallo,
* Thorsten Glaser [Wed, Jul 22 2015, 10:44:34AM]:
Eduard Bloch dixit:
Could you guys provide people with a PC-VM of some kind? I see those
references, https://wiki.debian.org/BasiliskII but no prebuilt image
Basilisk Ⅱ is for MacOS (classic) without MMU.
For Linux you’d want
Hallo,
* John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [Fri, Jul 17 2015, 09:58:19PM]:
On 07/17/2015 09:53 PM, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Please don't get me wrong, I don't contemn the development of
experimental architectures. But from my POV:
it was working with older boost versions and it works with newer ones.
(fixed the Reply-To)
Eduard Bloch dixit:
First, it'd be nice to send a link to your fellow maintainers so they
don't have to dig around.
Ah well, that’s linked from the PTS, and the reply answer to the
buildd should be short.
Second, I see libboost-serialization-dev in
Hallo,
* Thorsten Glaser [Fri, Jul 17 2015, 06:14:43PM]:
(fixed the Reply-To)
Was there anything to fix?
First, it'd be nice to send a link to your fellow maintainers so they
don't have to dig around.
Ah well, that’s linked from the PTS, and the reply answer to the
buildd should be short.
Eduard Bloch dixit:
Do you really expect me to hunt ghost bugs and identify the exact range
of boost versions that did have problems (espcially those which
No, but I do expect you to add a versioned B-D on at least the
major version your configure script requires.
Seriously? Or maybe you try to
On 07/17/2015 09:53 PM, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Please don't get me wrong, I don't contemn the development of
experimental architectures. But from my POV:
it was working with older boost versions and it works with newer ones.
m68k isn't experimental, it was Debian's *first* official port and it's
Andreas Schwab dixit:
What's the issue? boost 1.58.0 works fine here.
boost1.54 is in Not-For-Us for 600 days due to #719484
and Debian doesn’t have anything newer than that.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei
Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de writes:
@other m68k porters: time to prod the boost people again, maybe?
What's the issue? boost 1.58.0 works fine here.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for
11 matches
Mail list logo
