Re: Bug#977223: guile-3.0: FTBFS on hppa - segmentation faults

2022-02-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Rob! On 2/28/22 19:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > The attached patch seems to work correctly. I had to escape the whole > statements > so that they are not interpreted by automake. I have verified that the attached patch fixes the build on 32-bit PowerPC (powerpc). Adrian --

Re: Bug#977223: guile-3.0: FTBFS on hppa - segmentation faults

2022-02-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Rob! The attached patch seems to work correctly. I had to escape the whole statements so that they are not interpreted by automake. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de

Re: Bug#977223: guile-3.0: FTBFS on hppa - segmentation faults

2022-02-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! On 2/28/22 11:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 2/28/22 09:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I tested your proposed patch on the porterbox perotto.debian.net in a powerpc >> chroot, but unfortunately it didn't work: > > I think this check is wrong: > > diff --git

Re: Bug#977223: guile-3.0: FTBFS on hppa - segmentation faults

2022-02-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Rob! On 2/28/22 09:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I tested your proposed patch on the porterbox perotto.debian.net in a powerpc > chroot, but unfortunately it didn't work: I think this check is wrong: diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 827e1c09d..dec060414 100644 ---

Re: Bug#977223: guile-3.0: FTBFS on hppa - segmentation faults

2022-02-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Rob! On 2/28/22 05:13, Rob Browning wrote: > Oh, and I'm not sure it's working exactly right yet, but I'd been toying > with a more selective approach that works with automake's if/then > restrictions via an AM_CONDITIONAL. Of course we'll still need to > figure out which Makefiles we need to