Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-18 Thread Karoly Balogh
On Tue, 18 Oct 2022, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Given that I develop rebootstrap, attempting to use it for a time64 > > bootstrap seemed quite natural. I've been talking to this with Steve > > multiple times including DC22. The question was how to plug it in. In > > the end I went

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-18 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Steve McIntyre wrote: > likely to still be in routine use beyond 2038 Sidenote towards ISO 9660 image producers: Don't forget to check from time to time whether Linux removed the int bottleneck in fs/isofs/. See: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800627#38 The bug report

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-18 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 10/18/22 15:47, Steve McIntyre wrote: I don't want to be rude, but I really don't see how m68k fits here. Of course, feel free to do a rebootstrap if you like, but I genuinely don't see any great need for it. I don't see the need for starting another "Why does Debian Ports exist?"

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-18 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 03:33:17PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >Hi Helmut! > >On 10/18/22 12:48, Helmut Grohne wrote: >> I was also wondering about this Y2038 thingy and did some experiments. >> I'm reporting what I found to document it, but don't see much actionable >> stuff here.

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-18 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Helmut! On 10/18/22 12:48, Helmut Grohne wrote: I was also wondering about this Y2038 thingy and did some experiments. I'm reporting what I found to document it, but don't see much actionable stuff here. Many thanks to Arnd Bergmann for his input. Attempt #1: rebootstrap Given that I