Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

2023-08-29 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 5:53 PM Karoly Balogh via Libc-help wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > > I don't want to force anyone here, but I'd also be fine with that. The > > > only > > > downside, apart from compatibility, appears to be slightly increased > > >

Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

2023-08-29 Thread Karoly Balogh
Hi, On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > I don't want to force anyone here, but I'd also be fine with that. The only > > downside, apart from compatibility, appears to be slightly increased memory > > usage, and you're not exactly going to run modern Linux with 8MB RAM

Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

2023-08-29 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi Adrian, On 29/08/23 22:51, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 15:17 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: On Aug 28 2023, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: The FP failures are most likely the result of the limitations of the FPU emulation in QEMU for m68k. ARAnyM is known to

Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

2023-08-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Adrian, On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:51 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 15:17 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Aug 28 2023, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > After all, we had to change the ABI for TLS support as well, didn't > > > we? > > > > Nope. > > So,

Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

2023-08-29 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 14:29 +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 14:50 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Hi Adhemerval! > > > > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 09:44 -0300, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote: > > > If the idea is really to endeavor on a new ABI for m68k, it means a

Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

2023-08-29 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 15:17 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Aug 28 2023, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > The FP failures are most likely the result of the limitations of the FPU > > emulation > > in QEMU for m68k. ARAnyM is known to have much better FPU emulation support > > than > >

Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

2023-08-29 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, On 29.8.2023 4.14, Finn Thain wrote: On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: And since we have to break the ABI anyway to be able to use 64-bit time_t If you're worried about Y2038, aren't you jumping the gun? I reckon we have about 10 years in which to figure out what a

Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

2023-08-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Richard, On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:17 PM Richard wrote: > On August 28, 2023 11:26:58 AM UTC, Richard wrote: > >On August 28, 2023 7:00:07 AM UTC, Geert Uytterhoeven > >wrote: > >>On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 11:36 AM James Le Cuirot > >> wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 10:46 +1000, Finn