Re: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff

2017-08-06 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 08/06/2017 05:00 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I am currently testing the updated patch on armel, armhf and > m68k. If it succeeds, it should be included for the next upload > and the workaround for m68k from #868255 [1]. ... the workaround for #868255 should be removed and Zero

Re: [Openjdk] Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff

2017-08-06 Thread Matthias Klose
On 06.08.2017 11:04, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 08/06/2017 05:00 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I am currently testing the updated patch on armel, armhf and >> m68k. If it succeeds, it should be included for the next upload >> and the workaround for m68k from #868255 [1]. > >

Re: [Openjdk] Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff

2017-08-06 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 08/06/2017 05:29 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> ... the workaround for #868255 should be removed and Zero should >> be enabled on armhf as well. I was just interrupted writing the >> bug report during the first DebConf talk :). > > armhf builds hotspot by default. Yes, but it has Zero disabled.

Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff

2017-08-06 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Source: openjdk-9 Version: 9~b181-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: armel armhf m68k Hi! The patch jdk-8067331.diff is obviously broken since it patches the functions Atomic::xchg and Atomic::xchg_ptr to not return the values of arm_lock_test_and_set and