>
> Why cfengine and not debconf? It seems to me that debconf is a
> natural for solving these problems. In fact, there's no reason why
> dbootstrap couldn't ultimately be replaced by a debconf script,
> leading to a single system for automated (with conf file, network db,
> whatever) or manual
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 01:45:52PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We use the Debian
> > distribution and a collection of shell- and Perl-scripts for the
> > installation process. Changes to the configuration files of the
> > operating system are made b
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We use the Debian
> > distribution and a collection of shell- and Perl-scripts for the
> > installation process. Changes to the configuration files of the
> > operating system are made by the tool cfengine.
>
> Why cfengine and
Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We use the Debian
> distribution and a collection of shell- and Perl-scripts for the
> installation process. Changes to the configuration files of the
> operating system are made by the tool cfengine.
Why cfengine and not debconf? It seems to me that de
I'm very happy to announce the first release of FAI (Fully automatic
installation).
FAI is a non interactive system to install a Debian Linux operating
system on a PC cluster. You can take one or more virgin PCs, turn on
the power and after a few minutes Linux is installed, configured and
running
5 matches
Mail list logo
