Re: gcc -O2 on alpha miscompiles ifupdown?

2001-01-07 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 05 Jan 2001, Ron Farrer wrote: Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) wrote: Like the subject says; if I build ifupdown (0.6.4-1) on alpha with -O2 it breaks, if I build it with -O0, it's fine. With -O2, trying to trace what's going on with gdb doesn't seem to work (it jumps all

Re: size of glibc on alph rootdisk

2001-01-07 Thread Falk Hueffner
Chris Lumens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi there. I've been working on a Slackware port to the Alpha for some time and have been having issues getting my rootdisks down to size. I went looking at the sizes of things on the Debian rootdisk and noticed that your libc.so is only about 600k.

Re: gcc -O2 on alpha miscompiles ifupdown?

2001-01-07 Thread Matthias Klose
Please check with a gcc-2.95.3 prerelease compiled by Chris (http://master.debian.org/~doko/alpha) or with the test release currently in incoming. Current gcc snapshots (2.97) can be found in experimental (currently in incoming). Jim Crilly writes: Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au)

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status

2001-01-07 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 05 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: How come the only 4.0.2 packages that exist are the ones I built myself? Space and time constraints, I guess. If the alpha or m68k people are having compile-time problems, I haven't heard a peep out of anyone about it. I'm not sure who usually

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status

2001-01-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 03:11:12PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: On Fri 05 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: How come the only 4.0.2 packages that exist are the ones I built myself? Space and time constraints, I guess. If the alpha or m68k people are having compile-time problems, I

Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status

2001-01-07 Thread djw
Aye. I have gotten X to compile within barely 800Mb, but that is pushing it. -- ** Derek J Witt** * Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/ * *** Houston, the