Tom Evans wrote:
I was trying to boot 2.6.23-rc1 a few weeks ago. Asked about the newer
binutils - thought that may have been the reason it failing.
Glad you hit the kml instead and found an answer (and glad I wasn't the
only person seeing a problem with the 2.6.23-rcX series).
It wasn't a
i don't need any of the 2.6.23 functionality - I was just really trying the
2.6.23 kernel to
make sure nothing major was broken with it.
I *could* use bootp I suppose, but that would require a tftp service someplace
- suppose that's not so hard.
I will probably just wait for an update, or
Thomas Evans wrote:
i don't need any of the 2.6.23 functionality - I was just really trying the
2.6.23 kernel to
make sure nothing major was broken with it.
Seems OK on the few machines I've tried: LX164, ES45, AS1200.
I'm interested in the CFS stuff, see if it makes any difference
in the
Jay Estabrook wrote:
If you can't wait for that, you can always use BOOTP, which bypasses
aboot entirely... :-)
Unfortunately, that may be the only way to get past this problem in
the near term :-(. Just for grins and giggles, I retrieved the source
package for aboot-0.9b-3 and tried to build
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 10:17:33AM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
The posted reply was:
try http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/14/259
As it turns out, the problem was actually introduced with 2.6.23-rc1:
2.6.22 works fine.
The l-k people say aboot needs a patch. Question to Steve L. et al: is
a patch
Bob Tracy wrote:
Jay Estabrook wrote:
If you can't wait for that, you can always use BOOTP, which bypasses
aboot entirely... :-)
Unfortunately, that may be the only way to get past this problem in
the near term :-(. Just for grins and giggles, I retrieved the source
package for
Steve Langasek wrote:
FWIW, the issue with 2.6.23rc booting deserves its own bug in the BTS.
Just added: see #438431. Feel free to reclassify the severity if I
understated it.
--
---
Bob Tracy | Eagles may soar,
The aboot patch in the referenced l-k posting did the trick. My Alpha
is up and running on 2.6.23-rc3 as I type this...
I'm still willing to test an official updated aboot package when it's
available, but the value added at this point is probably minimal if the
Debian source mods (for packaging)
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:50:06PM -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
The aboot patch in the referenced l-k posting did the trick. My Alpha
is up and running on 2.6.23-rc3 as I type this...
I'm still willing to test an official updated aboot package when it's
available, but the value added at this
9 matches
Mail list logo
