Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 8 March 2010 11:45, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 01.03.2010 20:54, Andrew John Hughes wrote: On 27 February 2010 16:49, Matthias Klosed...@ubuntu.com  wrote: Building icedtea6 on alpha and armel using a two stage bootstrap fails with different errors. These are no new errors,

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08.03.2010 13:34, Andrew John Hughes wrote: further, is it correct that the -ecj patch is applied to *both* the openjdk and openjdk-ecj directory? $ ls -l build/openjdk*/jdk/src/share/classes/sun/misc/FloatConsts.java -rw-rw-r-- 2 doko doko 4147 Feb 17 03:14

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 8 March 2010 12:41, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 08.03.2010 13:34, Andrew John Hughes wrote: further, is it correct that the -ecj patch is applied to *both* the openjdk and openjdk-ecj directory? $ ls -l build/openjdk*/jdk/src/share/classes/sun/misc/FloatConsts.java

Re: icedtea6 build failures on alpha and armel using gcj

2010-03-08 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:44:59PM +, Andrew John Hughes wrote: Ok, I didn't realise it was a hard linked copy. I'll disable that; we don't want the ecj patches affecting the main tree. Applying a patch to a hardlink copy does not affect other copies. patch creates a new file (hence