Re: Potential issues for most ports (Was: Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info))

2013-11-04 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 03/11/13 10:54, Niels Thykier wrote: Come to think of it; maybe we should have a BTS page for each of the ports (e.g. a pseudo package in the BTS). We've had this on kfreebsd, due it to having been a release goal:

Re: Qt5 switching qreal from float to double on arm*

2013-11-04 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:29:05 -0300 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Starting from Qt 5.2.0 (most probably from rc1 and definitely not from beta1 currently in experimental) Qt5 will switch qreal from float to double on arm*. We have the option to keep some

Re: Qt5 switching qreal from float to double on arm*

2013-11-04 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Saturday 02 November 2013 15:29:05 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: [snip] We have the option to keep some archs in float by passing a compilation parameter. I've done so for armel and sh4, so only armhf will switch to double. Just for the record, I din't considered the switch

Re: Potential issues for most ports (Was: Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info))

2013-11-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-11-03 16:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 03/11/13 10:54, Niels Thykier wrote: Come to think of it; maybe we should have a BTS page for each of the ports (e.g. a pseudo package in the BTS). We've had this on kfreebsd, due it to having been a release goal:

Re: Potential issues for most ports (Was: Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info))

2013-11-04 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-11-03 23:04, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:54:34AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: [...] I suppose a sponsor-only DD could be sufficient, provided that the sponsor knows the porters well enough to be willing to sign off on e.g. access to porter boxes. I guess the