[martinw...@yahoo.it: Bug#497165: amiga-fdisk-cross is not being built on any architecture other than i386]

2008-10-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Hi, could the buildd admins please enable building for amiga-fdisk and upload the resulting packages (powerpc has been built, but it seems it was never uploaded). thanks, Christian - Forwarded message from Martin Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Subject: Bug#497165: amiga-fdisk-cross is not bei

Re: beta status

2005-11-04 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:00:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >

Re: beta status

2005-11-04 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > >

Re: Bug#324030: swt-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from 'void*' to 'jint' loses precision

2005-09-13 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:52:02AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > The build times out on m68k: > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/swt-gtk-3.1' > gcj -fPIC -fjni -c `find org -name *.java` > make[1]: *** [java-stamp] Terminated > make: *** [build-stamp] Terminated > Build killed with sig

Re: call for ports to begin using 2.4.0 headers for glibc

2001-01-16 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:34:44PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > I have a spare A1200 with 68030 processor lying around, it has no harddisk > though. > > Would that count toward donating hardware ? Send it to Ben, if he can keep up with the "speed" of the machine. Christian

Re: call for ports to begin using 2.4.0 headers for glibc

2001-01-16 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, the big deal is that to enable LFS on glibc, it must be compiled > against 2.4.0 headers. This does not break when running on 2.2.x You mean we have to make binNMUs of glibc? Or will you make a new upload which explicitly requests