CODENAME=sid
$ export ARCHES=hurd-i386
$ CONF.sh && ./build.sh
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff --git a/CONF.sh b/CONF.sh
index 99e58ad..08ffbd7 100644
--- a/CONF.sh
+++ b/CONF.sh
@@ -62,11 +62,15 @@ export BASEDIR=`pwd`
# export CDNAME=debian
# Building $codenam
> target architecture of the ISO images.
I did not even realise that. So I will add kfreebsd-i386 next.
I expect there might be problems trying to build linux arches from a
kfreebsd host. But we should try to find out, and then maybe fix it.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
s
it is practical (or rather, allow dpkg-buildflags to
enable it).
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
re; but add to that the kernel and any bootloaders.
Being able to rebootstrap, should be part of the arch release
qualification anyway IMHO.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, or OpenJDK for example.
Having a stable set of build-essential packages is important for ports
to get DSA-administered buildds, for developers to be able to run it,
and for the port to progress further.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ating any or using devices.tar.gz; even for more exotic use
cases like BSD jails. hurd appears to have something equivalent.
Thanks for letting us know.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Paul Wise wrote:
Do any porters have any input on this page?
https://wiki.debian.org/GettingPorted
This page seems it will be useful; I will add some bits to it.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
be
appropriate for debian-devel-announce; or if your mail only concerns a
few ports it should be convenient to cross-post to the relevant ports'
lists only.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
from glibc/2.19-10 in:
http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-sh4/Packages.bz2
So. although the sh4 buildds have built the sh4 .debs, they're not being
properly installed into that archive; you'll have to ask
debian-ports.org admins about it.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste
.
The issue with running the GCC testsuite on kfreebsd-amd64 buildds is
being fixed by FreeBSD upstream, and on Debian buildds within 1-2 weeks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
]: http://lists.debian.org/5266df9d.9040...@pyro.eu.org
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/529688a8.8080
, and the maintainer of the
pseudopackage being the ports list.
Would that be only for generic issues with a port, not specific to a
package? I doubt this would be used much. These bugs might typically
be reassigned to kernel packages or eglibc anyway.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/527665af.2040...@pyro.eu.org
to be very low. A
working JVM is quite a lot to ask, the current openjdk-7 is not even
built for mipsel in more. mipsel buildds and porterboxes had only 1GB
RAM maximum until now, and that is heavily used already for their
current tasks.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
that would be an accomplishment. And the smaller the initial set of
packages required to boostrap the process, the better.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
builds
happening so we could see unexpected changes occurring.
[2]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
So if something can make something that fulfills all the above goals it
would certainly be beneficial :)
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
powerpcspe ppc64 sh4* sparc64*
* these ports don't appear to have successfully built GCC 4.8 yet.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
-2) whereas m68k still has only the 4.8.0-7 you
uploaded.
You will also first need newer binutils (= 2.23.52) which is still in
the build queue.
(This applies to ppc64 as well).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
