On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 07:27:25AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
>
> On 6-Jul-11, at 1:37 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:37:15PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Aurelien Jarno
> >> wrote:
> >>>You can send them to debian-glibc@lists.d
gt; porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the
>> usertag (e.g., 'debian-m...@lists.debian.org' as user, and 'm68k' as
>> tag).
>>
>> Before I'll fire off an email to d-d-a announcing that, does anyone have
>> any comm
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:20:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 09/02/09 at 16:33 +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> > * dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > > > Please
ction needed.
I'd be happy to do a manual upload for hppa if it would build, but
this isn't just a problem with the buildds :(
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:51:15PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa an
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> ruby1.9 still fails to build on hppa and alpha.
> >>
> >> On hppa, it's caused by a kernel bug, whi
o it being
retried again of course (and I'm not the buildd admin anyway) - I just
want to set your expectations.
> On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter
> machines do work, though.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 02:35:22PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 02:56 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>
> > Other than the testing I mentioned above, I've also had successful test
> > reports from Bdale and Tim Cutts (on albeniz.d.o, iirc).
>
> Fo
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 01:18:05PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:16:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey Steve, Helge,
> > I've put together an updated etch aboot package that includes the
> > fix for booting >=
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:32:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080527 10:56]:
> > etch's aboot doesn't permit booting recent 2.6 kernels. While
> > backporting a fix for this issue, I ran into a couple of other build
hose who don't
read the release notes, they can still revert to their existing 2.6.18
image.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stable versions are
working fine, since that's where I pulled this fix from :)
> By the way Dann, I see your patches for the 2.4 nubus ppc kernel so I
> know your work.
heh - unlikely it was anything original from my side, i typically just
port other people's work ;)
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
le and Tim Cutts (on albeniz.d.o, iirc).
This is obviously a requirement for alpha support in etchnhalf since
2.6.24 adds the ELF header incompatability. (Though releasing w/o
alpha support is an option as well).
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
_LOAD when
+ loading the kernel, so that the new PT_NOTE sections in 2.6.23rc1 and
+ above don't cause load failures. Thanks to Richard Henderson for the
+ patch.
+
+ -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 14 May 2008 02:38:35 -0600
+
aboot (0.9b-3) unstable; urgenc
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:47 -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Could I request someone to test for the presence of a G77 bug on 64-bit
> platforms? Please install g77 and gcc on a *Sid* machine and ensure
> that gcc is a symlink to
15 matches
Mail list logo
