Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-11-17 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 17 Nov 2008, Paul Slootman wrote: Hmm, I have no problem booting a 2.6 kernel on my XLT which uses MILO. OK, after re-reading the thread, I have to admit that I have LEGACY_START set :-) Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-11-17 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 17 Nov 2008, Matthew W. S. Bell wrote: Further investigation eventually reveals that the only change in the kernels is the CONFIG_ALPHA_LEGACY_START_ADDRESS. This option has the following help: - The 2.4 kernel changed the kernel start address from 0x31 to 0x81 to make room

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-11-17 Thread Matthew W. S. Bell
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 00:39 -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: That's, what, 5MB of space? It seems to me we have it backwards -- legacy should be the default, and folks on newer hardware can apt-get install the non-legacy kernel if they want to free up 5mb of physical memory. Or am I missing

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-11-17 Thread Jay Estabrook
Legacy mode is necessary ONLY for MILO machines - all machines running SRM will work fine without legacy mode. And yes, there's more of a gap between low memory stuff and the kernel when in non-legacy mode, but that doesn't mean it goes unused - the kernel can use it for paging, or static space,

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-11-16 Thread Matthew W. S. Bell
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 00:32 +0100, Matthew W. S. Bell wrote: Well, I still don't entirely know what the -legacy package is for nor what constitutes an Alpha Legacy Machine. Looking at the linux-2.6 Debian changelog it appears it may be something to do with MILO. Further investigation

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-11-16 Thread Brian Szymanski
That's, what, 5MB of space? It seems to me we have it backwards -- legacy should be the default, and folks on newer hardware can apt-get install the non-legacy kernel if they want to free up 5mb of physical memory. Or am I missing something? Matthew W. S. Bell wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 00:32

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-11-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:39:50AM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: That's, what, 5MB of space? It seems to me we have it backwards -- legacy should be the default, and folks on newer hardware can apt-get install the non-legacy kernel if they want to free up 5mb of physical memory. Or am I

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-11-16 Thread Brian Szymanski
Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:39:50AM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: That's, what, 5MB of space? It seems to me we have it backwards -- legacy should be the default, and folks on newer hardware can apt-get install the non-legacy kernel if they want to free up 5mb of

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-09-01 Thread maximilian attems
[ adding d-alpha on cc ] On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Matthew W. S. Bell wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-4 Severity: normal Please would you update the description of the legacy and generic (and possibly smp) packages such that the user would be able to work out what type of

Re: Bug#497230: [alpha] legacy and generic package descriptions

2008-09-01 Thread Matthew W. S. Bell
maximilian attems wrote: what do you suggest? Well, I still don't entirely know what the -legacy package is for nor what constitutes an Alpha Legacy Machine. Looking at the linux-2.6 Debian changelog it appears it may be something to do with MILO. Matthew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to