Re: aboot vs. linux-image-2.6.24

2008-05-04 Thread Tim Cutts
On 2 May 2008, at 7:20 pm, Steve Langasek wrote: Urrgh, argh. Well, the only bit you need from the new aboot package is the boot block - perhaps you could extract that from the lenny .deb, and install it to the disk using swriteboot, without bothering with a backport of the packages?

Re: aboot vs. linux-image-2.6.24

2008-05-04 Thread Ulrich Teichert
Hi, [del] scsi 0:0:3:0: Direct-Access COMPAQ BF01865222 B014 PQ: 0 ANSI: 3 target0:0:3: tagged command queuing enabled, command queue depth 16. target0:0:3: Beginning Domain Validation target0:0:3: asynchronous target0:0:3: wide asynchronous target0:0:3: FAST-40 WIDE SCSI

aboot vs. linux-image-2.6.24

2008-05-02 Thread Tim Cutts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi chaps, I guess this is mainly aimed at Steve: As many of you will have noticed, the ES45 machines {albeniz,goetz}.debian.org running standard etch SMP kernels have been rather unstable of late. We'd like to try using the etch-and-a-half

Re: aboot vs. linux-image-2.6.24

2008-05-02 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Tim, On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:00:43AM +0100, Tim Cutts wrote: I guess this is mainly aimed at Steve: As many of you will have noticed, the ES45 machines {albeniz,goetz}.debian.org running standard etch SMP kernels have been rather unstable of late. We'd like to try using the