--On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 12:30:13 AM -0700 Bill MacAllister
w...@stanford.edu wrote:
--On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:44:31 AM +1200 Michael Cree
mc...@orcon.net.nz wrote:
On Mon, April 18, 2011 1:48 pm, Witold Baryluk wrote:
On 04-14 06:43, Bill MacAllister wrote:
It appears we
On 04/17/2011 09:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:34 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the next
two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the default
compiler for almost any other
On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of
GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and
powerpc.
Could you include armhf in the list as well?
Thanks
Konstantinos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 04/26/2011 05:31 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klosed...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of
GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and
powerpc.
Could you include armhf in the list as well?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis
mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote:
On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of
GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and
powerpc.
Could you
You can get the decrypted rpm (and all the other Compaq tools and
libraries) here:
http://alphalinux.org/software/ccc/
Oh. Thanks you! I was also searching this yeasterday few hours :)
HP should open-source as much as possible from this compiler IMHO.
Similar like they done with AdvFS for
On 04-26 00:29, Bill MacAllister wrote:
It would be great to get a summary of machine and sites. From this email
stream I think the list is:
System DescriptionContributor
-
2 XP1000, 1GB RAM Witold
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 04/17/2011 09:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:34 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the
next
two weeks before more transitions start.
Matthias Klose dixit:
At this point, pretty well after the GCC 4.6.0 release, I would like to avoid
switching more architectures to 4.5, but rather get rid of GCC 4.5 to reduce
maintenance efforts on the debian-gcc side, even before the multiarch changes
Porters side, too. I’m okay with
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'll make GCC 4.6 the
default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at
least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc.
If you do the switch, please
Kurt Roeckx, le Tue 26 Apr 2011 21:28:57 +0200, a écrit :
Is there a reason not to switch the remaining (release) arches
(ia64, kfreebsd-*, sparc, s390)? Maybe hurd-i386 too?
There's no real reason to defer hurd-i386, as it's basically like i386,
and the key packages (glibc/hurd/gnumach)
On 04/26/2011 09:28 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'll make GCC 4.6 the
default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at
least on amd64, armel, i386 and
On 04-14 21:09, Michael Cree wrote:
On 04/04/11 05:25, Matt Turner wrote:
This is partly due to the fact that I hate trying to submit things to
glibc. Also that I don't have any time right now. But mostly because I
hate glibc development.
So, is there someone in this new Alpha porting team
13 matches
Mail list logo
