On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:22:44PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Well the log to me looks like a g++ bug, or possibly something in libqt,
but probably the compiler. Too bad you can't tell which g++ version was
installed at the time of the compile on each architecture's buildd.
Looking at the
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
could the buildd admins please enable building for amiga-fdisk and upload
the resulting packages (powerpc has been built, but it seems it was never
uploaded).
It's not upto buildd admins, it's upto packages-arch-specific[1]
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:52:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
so that maintainers could apply them to architecture-specific bugs when
necessary. The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the
porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the
usertag (e.g.,
the buildd's, file bugs on failed builds
- provide packagers bugfixes in case they are unable to fix armel bugs
in their package themself
For armel, armhf and possibly in future for arm64:
- test packages on the architectures
- fix arch-related bugs
I am a DD,
Riku Voipio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (DD), Steve McIntyre (DD)
I am surprised not to see Riku Voipio and Hector Oron on this list as
I know they help manage the buildds and Riku signs uploads. I don't
know if they are trying to escape, or just being too slack to send
mail :-)
Sorry, I missed the fact
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:16:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Over all, most people (who answered it) was positive towards the switch.
> Based on this, I suspect that if we make PIE default in Stretch, then
> we will do it for all architectures. That said, you will be notified if
> that
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 08:11:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Niels Thykier:
>
> > armel/armhf:
> >
> >
> > * Undesirable to keep the hardware running beyond 2020. armhf VM
> >support uncertain. (DSA)
> >- Source: [DSA Sprint report]
>
> Fedora is facing an issue
7 matches
Mail list logo
