Re: alsa and amd64 arch

2005-09-01 Thread Jonathan Kaye
En/La Brian R. Whitecotton ha escrit, a 01/09/05 06:40: Try booting with a Knoppix CD. Let it correctly indentify the sound hardware, let it correctly load the modules and then inspect the configuration. Of course, this will only identify the modules that work with the linux kernel

Re: Motherboard Report: Gigabyte GA-7A8DW

2005-09-01 Thread 彭 虹鈞
Hello, I use that iso image you told me, but I still got the problem lilo installation failed Running/sbin/lilo failed with error code 1 when I install lilo boot loader, and I try to use grub, and still not work. The system show fatal error.. Thanks for you help, and I'll keep on to try Debian

Re: alsa and amd64 arch

2005-09-01 Thread Sythos
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:08:41AM +0200, Jonathan Kaye wrote: I first got this system and then installed 32bit Debian). The problem is specific to my separate (sitting on a different HD) 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 installation. The required driver is snd_via82xx but it won't install Excuse me, but I

OT chroot problem

2005-09-01 Thread Graham Smith
Hi, Sorry this is a bit off topic but there isn't a debian-chroot list :o) but I reckon most people here run a chroot so here goes. I have just installed (an experimental version of) pgadmin3 into my chroot. The program itself works fine but for some reason it can't connect to the postgres

Re: Motherboard Report: Gigabyte GA-7A8DW

2005-09-01 Thread 彭 虹鈞
Hi, First time I download mini.iso from http://amd64.debian.net/debian-pure64/dists/stable/main/installer-amd64/current/images/monolithic/ and start installation. Everything is ok utill setup the boot loader. My favour is lilo, so I install it into MBR /dev/sda, but system show me lilo

Re: alsa and amd64 arch

2005-09-01 Thread Jonathan Kaye
Sythos wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:08:41AM +0200, Jonathan Kaye wrote: I first got this system and then installed 32bit Debian). The problem is specific to my separate (sitting on a different HD) 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 installation. The required driver is snd_via82xx but it won't install

Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)

2005-09-01 Thread Michelasso
On 8/29/05, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Corey Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In any case, I'm looking for a 64-bit java plugin that can run this: http://games.yahoo.com/games/downloads/tx.html I have Blackdown's Java package installed and it works fine with Konqueror.

Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)

2005-09-01 Thread Frank
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2005 13:28 schrieb Michelasso: Btw, how can you tell konqueror to use Blackdown's plugin? I have tried to add the directory /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox to the searched paths in the Konqueror Settings - Configure Konqueror - Plugins but it still sees only the kaffeine

Re: 64-bit java plugin (or lack thereof)

2005-09-01 Thread Michelasso
On 9/1/05, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check the settings under Konqueror Settings - Configure Konqueror - Java/Javascript, especially enable Java. Konqueror is not using the Mozilla plugin, but the standalone java executable somehow. I think for me it helped to put the full path

Re: network card on AMD64 installation

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:21:36AM -0400, Xiaozheng Ma wrote: I am installing AMD64 to my new computer, which has Abit ax8 motherboard. The installer could not find network device (or configed my network) with auto-detect DHCP option. After I manually set the network ip etc, It still

Re: network card on AMD64 installation

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:35:18AM -0300, Stephen Cormier wrote: I have a Abit KV8 Pro with I think the same netcard builtin and it would not recognize it either. Try using the CTRL + ALT +F2 keys at the same time to switch to the second virtual terminal then use modprobe via-velocity to

Re: I can get no... sound

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:16:31AM +0200, Yannick - Debian/Linux wrote: $lspci :00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 0059 (rev a2) Well at least in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 the snd-intel8x0 lists the nvidia 0059 chip as recognized. Maybe 2.6.8 it is not.

Re: Motherboard Report: Gigabyte GA-7A8DW

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:26:46PM +0800, ??? ?? wrote: Hello, I use that iso image you told me, but I still got the problem lilo installation failed Running/sbin/lilo failed with error code 1 when I install lilo boot loader, and I try to use grub, and still not work. The system show

Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64

2005-09-01 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dimecres 31 Agost 2005 23:56, Stefano Simonucci va escriure: On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:09 +0200, Frank wrote: They will both allow setting up a 32bit chroot, which is the recomended way to run openoffice since it isn't 64bit compatible yet. Using a chroot is not the only way of running

Re: network card on AMD64 installation

2005-09-01 Thread Stephen Cormier
On September 1, 2005 11:21 am, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:35:18AM -0300, Stephen Cormier wrote: I have a Abit KV8 Pro with I think the same netcard builtin and it would not recognize it either. Try using the CTRL + ALT +F2 keys at the same time to switch to the

Re: Installing amd64 on Adaptec 2015S (SmartRAID V) with dpt_i2o

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:21:30PM -0700, Neil Gunton wrote: I just built a server which has dual Opteron 265, 4GB RAM, Adaptec 2015S zero-channel RAID controller and 4 x Ultra320 10k SCSI drives. I am having a problem installing Debian amd64, because of the 2015S card. This requires the

Re: network card on AMD64 installation

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:00:25PM -0300, Stephen Cormier wrote: Thanks for the information I had experienced the same problem with the installer and thought that the Giga lan was the same with the newer via chipset they have on the board. BTW please do not CC me I am subscribed and read

Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64

2005-09-01 Thread Stefano Simonucci
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 16:37 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: A Dimecres 31 Agost 2005 23:56, Stefano Simonucci va escriure: On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 18:09 +0200, Frank wrote: They will both allow setting up a 32bit chroot, which is the recomended way to run openoffice since it isn't

Code of Conduct was Re: network card on AMD64 installation

2005-09-01 Thread Stephen Cormier
On September 1, 2005 12:59 pm, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:00:25PM -0300, Stephen Cormier wrote: Thanks for the information I had experienced the same problem with the installer and thought that the Giga lan was the same with the newer via chipset they have on the

Re: Code of Conduct was Re: network card on AMD64 installation

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:04:08PM -0300, Stephen Cormier wrote: Aside from your opinion of mail reader design decisions it is against the Debian mailing list code of conduct to CC people unless specifically asked to do so. I will try to remember to hit the correct key. If only all mailing

Re: Installing amd64 on Adaptec 2015S (SmartRAID V) with dpt_i2o

2005-09-01 Thread Neil Gunton
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 03:21:30PM -0700, Neil Gunton wrote: I just built a server which has dual Opteron 265, 4GB RAM, Adaptec 2015S zero-channel RAID controller and 4 x Ultra320 10k SCSI drives. I am having a problem installing Debian amd64, because of the 2015S

Re: Installing amd64 on Adaptec 2015S (SmartRAID V) with dpt_i2o

2005-09-01 Thread Neil Gunton
Paul Brook wrote: CentOS 4.1 does work, with i2o_blocks, but I would much rather be running Debian. Please help... You could install debian from your CentOS installations using debootstrap. http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/apcs04.html Paul Thanks very much for the pointer. This

Re: Installing amd64 on Adaptec 2015S (SmartRAID V) with dpt_i2o

2005-09-01 Thread Markus Boas
Am Donnerstag 01 September 2005 20:22 schrieb Neil Gunton: Paul Brook wrote: CentOS 4.1 does work, with i2o_blocks, but I would much rather be running Debian. Please help... You could install debian from your CentOS installations using debootstrap.

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Theodore Kisner
I'm running the stock 2.6.13 kernel (from kernel.org) on my amd64 laptop without any problems. I chose option 3 (PREEMPT) in the config. Of course, YMMV... -Ted On Thursday 01 September 2005 11:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you download it from www.kernel.org? Is there a debian source

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread martellif
Did you download it from www.kernel.org? Is there a debian source package? Could you tell me the url in that circumstance? tnx! Rafael Rodríguez ha scritto: Hi. In the new kernel, when make oldconfig'ing, i've seen a new option: Preemption Model 1. No Forced Preemption (Server)

Re: Installing amd64 on Adaptec 2015S (SmartRAID V) with dpt_i2o

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:15:54AM -0700, Neil Gunton wrote: I have replaced the dpt_i2o files with the new ones provided by Adaptec, but I cannot figure out how to enable the module for selection under x86_64. I tried adding a line to arch/x86_64/configs/defconfig, but this still doesn't

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 01.09.2005 21:07:18, Theodore Kisner a écrit : I'm running the stock 2.6.13 kernel (from kernel.org) on my amd64 laptop without any problems. I chose option 3 (PREEMPT) in the config. Of course, YMMV... But if you want to build an intird with mkinitrd (or --initrd option of make-kpkg),

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Thomas Steffen
On 9/1/05, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if you want to build an intird with mkinitrd (or --initrd option of make-kpkg), the initrd needs devfs which has been dropped from kernel-2.6.13. I didn't know that initrd depends on it, but certainly the debian installer needs

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Paul Brook
What are we supposed to do instead? Fix mkinitrd so it doesn't need devfs. Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 01.09.2005 22:06:49, Neil Gunton a écrit : Thomas Steffen wrote: On 9/1/05, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if you want to build an intird with mkinitrd (or --initrd option of make-kpkg), the initrd needs devfs which has been dropped from kernel-2.6.13. I didn't

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread John C. Martin
On Thursday 01 September 2005 4:06 pm, Neil Gunton wrote: Thomas Steffen wrote: On 9/1/05, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if you want to build an intird with mkinitrd (or --initrd option of make-kpkg), the initrd needs devfs which has been dropped from kernel-2.6.13.

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:13:10PM -0400, John C. Martin wrote: I am a bit confused myself. I have been building and running initrd kernels for over a year now and have not been using devfs at all. I have been running 2.6.13 from kernel.org since this past weekend. d-i uses devfs. The

ia32-libs is a joke !

2005-09-01 Thread Ernest jw ter Kuile
This package is huge ! Is there a good reason it combines so many 32bits libraries from so many (x86) Debian packages ? Is there going to be a different ia32-libs package to download each time one of it's many elements is upgraded in debian 32 ? (which could be a daily happenning) It uses 27

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
Le 01.09.2005 22:17:21, Lennart Sorensen a écrit : On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:13:10PM -0400, John C. Martin wrote: I am a bit confused myself. I have been building and running initrd kernels for over a year now and have not been using devfs at all. I have been running 2.6.13 from kernel.org

Gnome 2.10 don't start due to esd

2005-09-01 Thread Sylvain Archenault
Hello, I don't think it's a specific amd64 problem, but I've got a problem which bothers me a lot. When I start a gnome session, it often blocks because there is two esd process running, if I kill the first, gnome-session starts ! I have a quick look to the bugs and google a little, but didn't

Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64

2005-09-01 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
Thank's Stefano, I will try to reproduce it soon. It's surprise me if it's really so easy and no package for amd64. Leo A Dijous 01 Setembre 2005 18:15, Stefano Simonucci va escriure: On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 16:37 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: A Dimecres 31 Agost 2005 23:56, Stefano

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Neil Gunton
Thomas Steffen wrote: On 9/1/05, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if you want to build an intird with mkinitrd (or --initrd option of make-kpkg), the initrd needs devfs which has been dropped from kernel-2.6.13. I didn't know that initrd depends on it, but certainly the

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Rafael Rodríguez
Sorry, but i use vanilla kernels (plus ck patchsets). U are not going to see a debianized kernel that fast after the official release, r u? Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 1 de Septiembre de 2005 19:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Did you download it from www.kernel.org? Is there a debian source

Re: ia32-libs is a joke !

2005-09-01 Thread Ernest jw ter Kuile
On Thursday 01 September 2005 22:58, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:56:43PM +0200, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote: anybody : is there an alternative ? Use a 32bit chroot. Then you control what gets installed. Indeed, seems far more sensible. But that too is klunky.

Re: ia32-libs is a joke !

2005-09-01 Thread Alexander Rapp
Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote: This package is huge ! Is there a good reason it combines so many 32bits libraries from so many (x86) Debian packages ? Is there going to be a different ia32-libs package to download each time one of it's many elements is upgraded in debian 32 ? (which could be a

Re: Code of Conduct was Re: network card on AMD64 installation

2005-09-01 Thread Matthias Julius
Stephen Cormier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aside from your opinion of mail reader design decisions it is against the Debian mailing list code of conduct to CC people unless specifically asked to do so. You should set the Mail-Followup-To header appropriately. Otherwise I guess many

Re: amd-64 vs Pure-64

2005-09-01 Thread Stefano Simonucci
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 23:26 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: Thank's Stefano, I will try to reproduce it soon. It's surprise me if it's really so easy and no package for amd64. Leo The openoffice 1.9 is unstable (beta). Effectively openoffice crashes sometimes. I don't know if

Re: Motherboard Report: Gigabyte GA-7A8DW

2005-09-01 Thread Thomas Peng 彭虹鈞
My system use BOARD Gigabyte GA-7A8DW Opteron 242 CPU X2 RAM 512 x2 AGP NVIDIA SCSI CARD ADAPTEC 29320LP (pci-x) SCSI HDD Segate 36g My HDD is 68pin connector, scsi card is Adaptec 29320LP. I tested many linux distributions last night, I successful installed SUSE Linux 9.2 on my system, it

Re: new 2.6.13 kernel

2005-09-01 Thread Marco Amadori
On Thursday 01 September 2005 22:36, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: [...] [DevFS] I *need* it for my lvm on raid In this bug #323391 [1] there is a patch to make yaird works, I use it, works for my lvm on raid systems, remember to add --verbose on the script `dpkg --listfiles yaird | grep -i