On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 01:39:34PM -0700, Corey Hickey wrote:
I have my system fully updated right now. When I run 'apt-get
upgrade', no packages are ready to install or held back because of
dependencies. When I run 'apt-get dist-upgrade', though, I get a
list of 73 packages that are to be
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 01:39:34PM -0700, Corey Hickey wrote:
I have my system fully updated right now. When I run 'apt-get
upgrade', no packages are ready to install or held back because of
dependencies. When I run 'apt-get dist-upgrade', though, I get a
list of
I have put together a computer using an AMD 64 processor with a Gigabyte
GA-M57SLI-S4 motherboard. I was wondering what I can do in the way of testing
to be able to add this to your list of compatible motherboards?
Sincerely,
Risto Mäennenä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lionel Elie Mamane:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 01:39:34PM -0700, Corey Hickey wrote:
I have my system fully updated right now. When I run 'apt-get
upgrade', no packages are ready to install or held back because of
dependencies. When I run 'apt-get dist-upgrade', though, I get a
list of 73
Hello,
in deed the documentation is very clear concerning the command line options.
What I was not able to figure out is what aptitude performs in gui mode when I
hit U to schedule all upgradeable packages for an upgrade. I guess upgrade
(which is equivalent to safe-upgrade) is used. Does s.o.
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:54:35AM -0400, Robert Isaac wrote:
Do you know the difference between Unix and Linux? Short answer is that
Linux wrote Linux when he needed a Unix but Unix was caught in the Unix
wars and there wasn't one available that wasn't tied up in legal
wrangling and
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:46:35AM -0400, Robert Isaac wrote:
Note that the reason that OpenBSD can claim only two security holes in
the default install in the past 10 years is that there are no services
active in a default install (you have to add commands to the startup
script to
Douglas A. Tutty escreveu:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:54:35AM -0400, Robert Isaac wrote:
Do you know the difference between Unix and Linux? Short answer is that
Linux wrote Linux when he needed a Unix but Unix was caught in the Unix
wars and there wasn't one available that wasn't tied up in
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:30:02AM -0700, Risto Maennena wrote:
I have put together a computer using an AMD 64 processor with a Gigabyte
GA-M57SLI-S4 motherboard. I was wondering what I can do in the way of testing
to be able to add this to your list of compatible motherboards?
Ehm, make
Yes, Linux wrote Linux when BSD wasn't available. I've read a quote
somewhere that if BSD had been available he wouldn't have bothered with
Linux.
I have to point that out that you just did it again. :-)
Don't worry, we'll just be used as lubricants when the kernel fulfills
its mission
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:25:19PM +0200, Wolfgang Mader wrote:
in deed the documentation is very clear concerning the command line options.
What I was not able to figure out is what aptitude performs in gui mode when
I
hit U to schedule all upgradeable packages for an upgrade. I guess
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:07:00AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty escreveu:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 01:54:35AM -0400, Robert Isaac wrote:
Do you know the difference between Unix and Linux? Short answer is that
Linux wrote Linux when he needed a Unix but Unix was
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 11:40 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
snip
Argh! %s/Linux/Linus (almost did it again again). Why couldn't he call
it LSD (Linus Software Distribution) instead of Linux?
Doug.
Well, IF he did that, then the dyslectic and the type-lectic would get
it confused with
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:40:35AM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Argh! %s/Linux/Linus (almost did it again again). Why couldn't he call
it LSD (Linus Software Distribution) instead of Linux?
Because I already have LSD - Levanto Software Development ;-)
-H
--
Heikki Levanto In Murphy We
Corey Hickey wrote:
I don't have anything non-default in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d.
They made a change (a very bad change in my mind) that has it install recommended files and
suggested files by default.
To go back to the sane old way:
Create a file called local in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d
edit
15 matches
Mail list logo
