, if the machine supports more
than 4 GB RAM, then the BIOS should as well. After all, why would
someone manufacture a machine that can handle more than 4 GB RAM and
then put in a BIOS that cannot?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 05:39:54PM -0400, Jim Crilly wrote:
On 07/07/07 04:45:57PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
The stock Debian kernels are configured like this:
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
So, if you have a machine with 4-64 GB RAM
in the card BIOS. This
is something that you DO NOT want. Use something that has REAL hardware
RAID (Intel MegaRAID, HP SmartArray, 3Ware, etc), or just use the Linux
built-in software RAID.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
of some sort or another.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
again.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
not sure why you marked this OT, since it is certainly on-topic,
assuming you are running it on Debian :-)
Just use shorewall.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
volume of ~5.6TB.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
size too big since it will waste much space. If
you will have mostly large files, then make the block sizes really big,
since you won't waste too much space but will make filesystem access
faster.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
it takes? I've had
some XFS partitions that were several hundred GBs (but not close to 1TB)
and those seemed to pass the fsck stage very quickly.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 03:58:27PM -0400, Mike Dresser wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Is it an exponential growth in the amount of time it takes? I've had
some XFS partitions that were several hundred GBs (but not close to 1TB)
and those seemed to pass the fsck stage
11 matches
Mail list logo
