On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:08:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
But you can mix the two. Use a 64bit kernel (yes, sarge does have
those in i386) while keeping your 32bit userland.
That way you have all the stability of sarge i386 and the hardware
support for 4GB ram of amd64 without
Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:08:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
But you can mix the two. Use a 64bit kernel (yes, sarge does have
those in i386) while keeping your 32bit userland.
That way you have all the stability of sarge i386 and the
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:07:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
More like 3.99Gb. The 2GB limit is the user/kernel split in linux. It
can also be a 3+1 split. In 64bit kernels however the kernel memory is
outside of the 32bit address space and except for the pages for the
syscall call
Hi All,
Thank You for your answers.
I have got a lot of useful information.
B. R.,
Krisztian Kompar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:33:21PM +0200, Kompar Krisztian wrote:
Yes, I have read it that I can use maximum 64Gb memory using PAE. But lot of
people wrote that 10-15% CPU time need for this. Is it true? Uptime
is very critical :) that is why I
Dean Hamstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i dont think anyone would say that the amd64 port is horendously unstable.
as a server, most of your standard software is 64bit friendly
and 64bit is by no means new ground for the linux kernel.
for example, you shouldnt see any 64bit specific issues
Kompar Krisztian wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to get more information about AMD64 port of debain sarge.
The stability and reliability is very important for me. For this time
only official i386 release of sarge are runing on my servers. Now I want
to use more than 4Gb RAM that is why I am
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 03:36:25PM +0200, Kompar Krisztian wrote:
I would like to get more information about AMD64 port of debain sarge.
The stability and reliability is very important for me. For this time
only official i386 release of sarge are runing on my servers. Now I want
to use more
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
If all you have a need for is to access more than 4 GB of RAM, then just
recompile your kernel with CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y.
Yes, I have read it that I can use maximum 64Gb memory using PAE. But lot of
people wrote that 10-15% CPU
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:33:21PM +0200, Kompar Krisztian wrote:
Yes, I have read it that I can use maximum 64Gb memory using PAE. But lot of
people wrote that 10-15% CPU time need for this. Is it true? Uptime
is very critical :) that is why I didn't try it, yet.
PAE is slower than direct
i dont think anyone would say that the amd64 port is horendously unstable.
as a server, most of your standard software is 64bit friendly
and 64bit is by no means new ground for the linux kernel.
for example, you shouldnt see any 64bit specific issues from...
apache.
mysql.
postgresql.
perl.
About ram, with:
amd64 debian testing
linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
at the moment 2GB ram
when, in few days, it will be upgraded to 8GB ram, is that kernel OK? If not,
is any suitable one available from debian repositories, or should I
recompile the kernel and which CONFIG?
Thank you
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:10:32PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
About ram, with:
amd64 debian testing
linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
at the moment 2GB ram
when, in few days, it will be upgraded to 8GB ram, is that kernel OK? If not,
is any suitable one available from debian
Francesco Pietra wrote:
About ram, with:
amd64 debian testing
linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
at the moment 2GB ram
when, in few days, it will be upgraded to 8GB ram, is that kernel OK? If not,
is any suitable one available from debian repositories, or should I
recompile the kernel
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:57:09AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
i dont think anyone would say that the amd64 port is horendously unstable.
as a server, most of your standard software is 64bit friendly
and 64bit is by no means new ground for the linux kernel.
for example, you shouldnt see
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 15:36:25 +0200, Kompar Krisztian wrote
Dear All,
I would like to get more information about AMD64 port of debain
sarge. The stability and reliability is very important for me. For
this time only official i386 release of sarge are runing on my
servers. Now I want to use
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
First, please don't top post. Second, it is generally not necessary to
CC everyone involved in the coversation. We all read the list.
Assuming everyone reads the list is not a valid assumption. People post
questions at times
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:24:49AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:57:09AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
i dont think anyone would say that the amd64 port is horendously unstable.
as a server, most of your standard software is 64bit friendly
and 64bit is by no
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
First, please don't top post. Second, it is generally not necessary to
CC everyone involved in the coversation. We all read the list.
Assuming everyone reads the list is not a valid assumption.
19 matches
Mail list logo
