Hans-J. Ullrich escreveu:
Am Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 schrieb Michael Langley:
You can get nvidia source from nvidia.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_amd64_display_archive.html
The source is inside the install package.
Just run the file with -x, --extract-only
Yes, I know this
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:59:22AM -0300, Erick Tostes wrote:
Hans-J. Ullrich escreveu:
Am Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 schrieb Michael Langley:
You can get nvidia source from nvidia.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_amd64_display_archive.html
The source is inside the install package.
Just
Lennart Sorensen 13:37 Fri 10 Jul
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 04:59:22AM -0300, Erick Tostes wrote:
Until the next xorg upgrade overwrites one of the files and breaks things.
Packages are a much better idea to use.
The nvidia installer is one of those awful things that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Sorensen escreveu:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at
04:59:22AM -0300, Erick Tostes wrote:
Hans-J. Ullrich escreveu:
Am Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 schrieb Michael Langley:
You can get nvidia source from nvidia.
Hi Randall,
thanks for the older package. I checked it out and can now verify: There is a
bug in nvidia-kernel or nvidia-glx.
As I could not find out, which of the two, I could not send a bugreport. So I
do it here.
I also can not test on a 32-bit system, so this report is amd64-related only
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:19:36PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
due to some crashes at the latest nvidia-driver of sid (version 185.x.x), I
would like to get back to the version before, which was 180.x.x.
Like 180.44 or something?
Sadly I could not find it on snapshots.debian.net, so I
Hi all,
due to some crashes at the latest nvidia-driver of sid (version 185.x.x), I
would like to get back to the version before, which was 180.x.x.
Sadly I could not find it on snapshots.debian.net, so I hope, some maintainer
might have it on his system and could send it to me or to
You can get nvidia source from nvidia.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_amd64_display_archive.html
The source is inside the install package.
Just run the file with -x, --extract-only
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:19:36 +0200
Hans-J. Ullrich hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote:
Hi all,
due to some
Am Sonntag 14 Juni 2009 schrieb Michael Langley:
You can get nvidia source from nvidia.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_amd64_display_archive.html
The source is inside the install package.
Just run the file with -x, --extract-only
Yes, I know this option. This would have been the other
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 19:19 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
due to some crashes at the latest nvidia-driver of sid (version 185.x.x), I
would like to get back to the version before, which was 180.x.x.
Sadly I could not find it on snapshots.debian.net, so I hope, some maintainer
Il giorno Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:05:02 -0500
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) ha scritto:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:35:30AM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
yesterday I tried to build the nvidia-kernel-modul from
experimental. Building and installation went fine, but when I tried
Am Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2009 schrieb dieeasy:
Il giorno Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:05:02 -0500
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) ha scritto:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:35:30AM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
yesterday I tried to build the nvidia-kernel-modul from
experimental
Dear maintainers,
yesterday I tried to build the nvidia-kernel-modul from experimental. Building
and installation went fine, but when I tried to install the package
nvidia-glx, it triued to install the new
kernel-package linux-image-openvz-amd64 and additionally some openvz tools
(for example
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:35:30AM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
yesterday I tried to build the nvidia-kernel-modul from experimental.
Building
and installation went fine, but when I tried to install the package
nvidia-glx, it triued to install the new
kernel-package linux-image-openvz
It looks like the exported kernel function global_flush_tlb disappeared
going from 2.6.24 to 2.6.25, and the change_page_attr function has been
throughout replaced with new functions. The nvidia module depends on them,
so it doesn't build anymore on amd64. Is an experimental new
nvidia-kernel
it doesn't build anymore on amd64. Is an experimental new
nvidia-kernel-source version fixing this available somewhare? Or, as an
alternative, does any kernel guru know how to replace the calls to these
functions in the nvidia kernel module to use the new kernel API?
I am working on it. 173.08 builds
On Wed, 14 May 2008 15:50:15 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I am working on it. 173.08 builds fine with 2.6.25 so if nothing else I
can compare 169.12 with 173.08 and see what nvidia changed to get around
the change.
Lennart,
bug #476504, and in particular this comment:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:33:07PM +, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 15:50:15 +0200, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I am working on it. 173.08 builds fine with 2.6.25 so if nothing else I
can compare 169.12 with 173.08 and see what nvidia changed to get around
the change.
the extra changes are relevant to some things. So
it might have been fine for 2.6.25-1 but isn't good enough for 2.6.25-2.
That's funny. It still works just fine for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l nvidia-kernel-2.6.25*
[cut]
ii nvidia-kernel-2.6.25-1-amd64 169.12-1
Someone have a prepacked debian way version with that patch and this
work with 2.6.25-2-amd64 too...
it's stable enough 173.08?
anyone have this debian way packed?
On 5/14/08, Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:33:07PM +, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:58:01PM +, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
That's funny. It still works just fine for me:
Yeah it does. I screwed up when I tried it. My mistake.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l nvidia-kernel-2.6.25*
[cut]
ii nvidia-kernel-2.6.25-1-amd64
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:13:24PM -0500, Jaime Ochoa Malagón wrote:
Someone have a prepacked debian way version with that patch and this
work with 2.6.25-2-amd64 too...
it's stable enough 173.08?
anyone have this debian way packed?
I do, running on my mtytv box for testing. I was trying
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 18:39 +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
hi,
Do 'apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel-common', then
run module assistant (m-a) as already suggest on this list.
I've done it several times, and it worked.
i tried to run m-a but the compilation ended
You will also want to install nvidia-glx after running module assistant.
but nvidia-glx is not available in etch. i had to use unstable version
when installing amd64 etch desktop.
any hints? what am i doing wrong?
This is caused by a stupid packaging error that remains to be fixed
Type cat
hi,
After installing an appropriate gcc package to match your running
kernel, the nvidia-kernel-source package can successfully create an
nvidia-kernel-$FOO package to match your system. nvidia-glx cannot
install without an appropriate nvidia-kernel package (which is what
module-assistant
should
be somehow (auto)magically created? all the things work now, so i really
don't have any idea how to test how does it work...
After installing an appropriate gcc package to match your running
kernel, the nvidia-kernel-source package can successfully create an
nvidia-kernel-$FOO package
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 17:38 +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
hi,
After installing an appropriate gcc package to match your running
kernel, the nvidia-kernel-source package can successfully create an
nvidia-kernel-$FOO package to match your system. nvidia-glx cannot
install without
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:19:40PM -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
So gdm is looking for /usr/X11R6/bin/X but my xserver now is:
/usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg
when I try and run this binary by hand I see these errors:
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Error: API mismatch: the NVIDIA kernel
unstable install nvidia-kernel-common
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-kernel-source
apt-get -t unstable install module-assistant
m-a a-i nvidia
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-glx
And somehow the 2.6.18 kernel headers got installed not sure when or how:
ii linux-kernel-headers
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 21:15 -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
andy:/etc/apt# apt-get install nvidia-graphics-drivers
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
E: Couldn't find package nvidia-graphics-drivers
There's no such (binary) package.
nvidia-kernel-common: Init
-kernel-common: Init scripts needed by Nvidia.
I've compiled the 2.6.17 kernel using the .config file that
came with 2.6.17-2-amd64 which seemed to go OK.
But all that gives me is an identical kernel and identical modules
as the precompiled ones that were already installed.
I compiled the nvidia
On (24/10/06 09:13), Henry Hollenberg wrote:
Jo Shields wrote:
There's no such (binary) package.
nvidia-kernel-common: Init scripts needed by Nvidia.
I've compiled the 2.6.17 kernel using the .config file that
came with 2.6.17-2-amd64 which seemed to go OK.
But all that gives me
nvidia-kernel-source: Source code required to compile a kernel module.
nvidia-kernel-$VERSION: Non-existant package with the kernel module in
it. When compiling your own module, it Provides: the appropriate
nvidia-kernel-$VERSION package.
nvidia-glx: Binary 2D/3D driver for X11
-free
deb-src http://cudlug.cudenver.edu/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
then:
apt-get -f install
which installed:
ii linux-image-2.6.18-1-amd642.6.18-2Linux
2.6.18 image on AMD64
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-kernel-common
apt-get -t unstable install
/ unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://cudlug.cudenver.edu/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
then:
apt-get -f install
which installed:
ii linux-image-2.6.18-1-amd642.6.18-2
Linux 2.6.18 image on AMD64
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-kernel-common
apt
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Error: API mismatch: the NVIDIA kernel module has the version 1.0-8774, but
this X module has the version 1.0-8776. Please make sure that the kernel
module and all NVIDIA driver components have the same version.
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:43:13PM -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
Yeah it was already pointed out to me that I must have compiled under
2.6.17-amd64 instead of booting into 2.6.18-amd64 first and then running
the m-a stuff. Lots of steps, boy my butt is getting tired.
Anyway, now I'm up
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:43:13PM -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
Yeah it was already pointed out to me that I must have compiled under
2.6.17-amd64 instead of booting into 2.6.18-amd64 first and then running
the m-a stuff. Lots of steps, boy my butt is getting tired.
Linux 2.6.18 image on AMD64
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-kernel-common
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-kernel-source
apt-get -t unstable install module-assistant
m-a a-i nvidia
apt-get -t unstable install nvidia-glx
And somehow the 2.6.18 kernel headers got installed
-get install module-assistant nvidia-kernel-source
~m-a prepare (sudo or root)
~m-a a-i nvidia (sudo or root)
~dpkg -i /usr/src/nvidia-kernel-moduleX.deb (sudo or root)
~apt-get install nvidia-glx (sudo or root)
Restart X.
I think this is exactly what I do on Etch
/nvidia unstable
nvidia-graphics-drivers
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable nvidia-kernel-common
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable nvidia-settings
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable nvidia-xconfig
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia
this source line for unstable drivers
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable
nvidia-graphics-drivers
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable
nvidia-kernel-common deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia
unstable nvidia-settings deb http://people.debian.org
/sources.list
#use this source line for unstable drivers
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable
nvidia-graphics-drivers
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable
nvidia-kernel-common deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia
unstable nvidia-settings deb http://people.debian.org
On Monday 23 October 2006 23:15, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
apt-get install nvidia-graphics-drivers
apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source if you are trying to build the module
yourself or apt-cache search nvidia without the to see what is available
for pre-compiled modules for your kernel
Hey gang,
I'm trying to get my nvidia stuff working on my AMD64 system again.
I have seen lots of different posts and instructions almost all
of which are incomplete. I've gotten stuck on one of the more
comlete ones looking for two packages:
nvidai-glx and nvidia-kernel-source
when I try
-graphics-drivers
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable nvidia-kernel-common
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable nvidia-settings
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable nvidia-xconfig
deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable modules
me the following:
$ apt-config dump |grep Architecture
APT::Architecture amd64;
$ apt-cache search nvidia-kernel
nvidia-kernel-common - NVIDIA binary kernel module common files
nvidia-glx - NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
nvidia-glx-ia32 - NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
nvidia-glx
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:33:11AM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
my:
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib
should be added of non-free?
As it is, it does not find nvidia, of course. Once modified as said, shoud
the
sources.list be left as modified or it is safer to
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:41:14AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:33:11AM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
my:
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib
should be added of non-free?
As it is, it does not find nvidia, of course. Once modified as
hi all,
I am using the amd64 port:
$ uname -a
Linux gala 2.6.17-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Aug 11 20:47:32 CEST 2006
x86_64 GNU/Linux
could somebody explain me the following:
$ apt-config dump |grep Architecture
APT::Architecture amd64;
$ apt-cache search nvidia-kernel
nvidia-kernel-common
::Architecture amd64;
$ apt-cache search nvidia-kernel
nvidia-kernel-common - NVIDIA binary kernel module common files
nvidia-glx - NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
nvidia-glx-ia32 - NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
nvidia-glx-legacy - NVIDIA binary Xorg driver (legacy version)
nvidia-glx-legacy
Dean Hamstead a écrit :
any chance of the latest nvidia driver becoming a package
the current version is seriously unstable on my GT6600 (pci-e)
infact, any 3d things cause crashes. unreal tournament 2004
results in quite a spectactular attempt to load and then
auto-reboot.
Dean
You can
whats the easiest way to get and build them?
Dean
Yannick - Debian/Linux wrote:
Dean Hamstead a écrit :
any chance of the latest nvidia driver becoming a package
the current version is seriously unstable on my GT6600 (pci-e)
infact, any 3d things cause crashes. unreal tournament 2004
completed successfully: the nvidia-kernel
package was created and also it was installed without any problem. I run
modprobe nvidia to make a test and it seems to work. Later I modified
the /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file:
- I did comment the GLCore and dri lines
- I change the driver to nvidia
.
The above instructions were completed successfully: the nvidia-kernel
package was created and also it was installed without any problem. I
run modprobe nvidia to make a test and it seems to work. Later I
modified the /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file:
- I did comment the GLCore and dri lines
- I change
(EE): Failed to load module nvidia (module does not exist, 0)
(EE): No drivers availabe
Install the nvidia-glx package.
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
which package provides the tool m-a?
Thanks, Volkher
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:25:04PM -0300, Angel Claudio Alvarez wrote:
You must apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source
then you must construct a deb package using make-kpkg --append-to
version (your kernel_version
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:35:36PM +0200, Volkher Scholz wrote:
which package provides the tool m-a?
module-assistant
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Volkher Scholz wrote:
Hi,
which package provides the tool m-a?
(I forgot to send this to the list, as usual)
Here's how you find out:
1. apt-get install apt-file
2. apt-file update
3. apt-file search m-a
Ok, so debian provides a zillion files that contain m-a. Since we want
a program it'll
Angel Claudio Alvarez ha scritto:
You must apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source
then you must construct a deb package using make-kpkg --append-to
version (your kernel_version) modules_install
and you'll get a nvidia-kernel.deb in /usr/src
dpkg -i nvidia-kernel...deb
modify your xorg.conf
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:25:04PM -0300, Angel Claudio Alvarez wrote:
You must apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source
then you must construct a deb package using make-kpkg --append-to
version (your kernel_version) modules_install
and you'll get a nvidia-kernel.deb in /usr/src
dpkg -i
El jue, 15-09-2005 a las 00:18 +0100, Ignacio José escribió:
Hi,
I'm trying to install the nvidia driver. I've a broken dependency
problem. When i'm try to install the nvidia-glx package the apt-get
program says to me that the nvidia-kernel-1.0.7174 package is not
installable
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:31:16AM -0400, David Wood wrote:
I saw some traffic on a web board about this yesterday when I was looking
to see if anyone had packaged the latest nvidia driver yet (BTW, no).
Seems like they released their latest driver with a dependency on some new
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
There probably will be a new debian package for the new nvidia driver
soon, assuming it hasn't changed anything drastic.
Good question. Depending on a glibc from experimental might be considered
drastic. :/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
During installation of the latest drivers no errors reported. Also lg file
(as I see) is clean
glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
glxinfo: relocation error: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1: symbol gnu_dev_makedev,
version GLIBC_2.3.3 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
No changes in X
hi,
thanx for the quick reply. kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 is installed, and yet,
nothing happens.
Avishai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all,
i've been trying to install the nvidia-kernel driver on my machine
(uname -r gives 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8), but for no avail. I've followed the
directions found in
/usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian and suggestions found
in
this recent thread:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group
/nvidia-kernel/nv] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8'
NVIDIA: left KBUILD.
nvidia.ko failed to build!
make[1]: *** [module] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 06:32:06AM -0800, Zachary Rizer wrote:
It would be best if we could have the maintainer patch
these himself and move them back upstream. I have not
yet contacted him myself because I'm uncertain as to
whether these patches are universal (meaning perhaps
they won't
implementation
of nvidia-kernel-source (and, as far as I know, you
cannot simply install the NVIDIA-*pkg.run file) you'll
have to apply the first patch to
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/os-agp.c
and the second patch to
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c,
after you have untarred the
nvidia-kernel
Hello there,
I have problem compiling nvidia kernel module with kernel
2.6.8-10-amd64-k8. architecture of my distro is i386 (dpkg
--print-architecture - i386) but I have athlon64 processor.
packages:
ii kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8 101
ii kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k82.6.8-11
ii
71 matches
Mail list logo
